From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb  5 16:18:39 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id QAA44549 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 16:18:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA19104 for linux-list; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 16:13:26 -0800
Received: from fir.engr.sgi.com (fir.engr.sgi.com [150.166.49.183]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA19099 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 16:13:25 -0800
Received: (from wje@localhost) by fir.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA29017; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 16:13:25 -0800
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 16:13:25 -0800
Message-Id: <199802060013.QAA29017@fir.engr.sgi.com>
From: "William J. Earl" <wje@fir.engr.sgi.com>
To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Another linux tidbit
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 439
Lines: 7

    I was just browsing this week's Info World, which includes
their "1997 Product of the Year" awards.  They gave the Operating
System award to Red Hat Linux, and the Best Technical Support
award to the Linux user community.  They wrote, "Find out what
you have been missing while you've been rebooting Windows NT", and,
in regard to support from commercial vendors, "Many times [the vendors]
deny that there are bugs in their software."

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb  5 16:34:36 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id QAA46357 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 16:34:36 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA25529 for linux-list; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 16:31:56 -0800
Received: from hollywood.engr.sgi.com (hollywood.engr.sgi.com [150.166.61.38]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA25520 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 16:31:54 -0800
Received: (from fisher@localhost) by hollywood.engr.sgi.com (940816.SGI.8.6.9/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA09851; Thu, 5 Feb 1998 16:31:54 -0800
From: fisher@hollywood.engr.sgi.com (William Fisher)
Message-Id: <199802060031.QAA09851@hollywood.engr.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: Another linux tidbit
To: wje@fir.engr.sgi.com (William J. Earl)
Date: Thu, 5 Feb 1998 16:31:49 -0800 (PST)
Cc: linux@hollywood.engr.sgi.com,
        fisher@hollywood.engr.sgi.com (William Fisher)
In-Reply-To: <199802060013.QAA29017@fir.engr.sgi.com> from "William J. Earl" at Feb 5, 98 04:13:25 pm
Reply-To: fisher@sgi.com
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL3]
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1147
Lines: 26

> 
>     I was just browsing this week's Info World, which includes
> their "1997 Product of the Year" awards.  They gave the Operating
> System award to Red Hat Linux, and the Best Technical Support
> award to the Linux user community.  They wrote, "Find out what
> you have been missing while you've been rebooting Windows NT", and,
> in regard to support from commercial vendors, "Many times [the vendors]
> deny that there are bugs in their software."
> 
	Bill Gates has explictly stated in several published interviews
	that Microsoft does NOT do software releases ONLY to fix bugs.

	"The only reason to release new software is for features which
	the customers are willing to pay." He even argued that the
	typical "fixed in the next release" quoted by technical support
	was a non-starter.

	I wonder what BillG does when he hits an bug in "his software"?
	What does he do after immediately calling technical support,
	waiting one on hold for 20+ minutes, he is then told
	"It's fixed in the next release", what does he do next?
	File bug report and waits for some new additional buggy feature(s)
	in the next release to arrive?

-- Bill


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Fri Feb  6 15:37:06 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id PAA129820 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 15:37:06 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA06108 for linux-list; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 15:32:45 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA06097 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 15:32:43 -0800
Received: from godzilla.taec.com (godzilla.taec.com [204.162.152.130]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via SMTP id PAA07858
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 15:32:43 -0800
	env-from (sasahm@taec.toshiba.com)
Received: from mailint.taec.com by godzilla.taec.com
          via smtpd (for SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) with SMTP; 6 Feb 1998 23:32:43 UT
Received: from oita (oita.taec.com [198.232.207.41])
	by sol-x86-1.taec.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA27891
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 15:32:38 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199802062332.PAA27891@sol-x86-1.taec.com>
To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Trouble in making swap area
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.68 on Emacs 19.28.1 / Mule 2.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 1998 15:32:38 -0800
From: Masashi Sasahara/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOns4NkA1O0obKEI=?=  <sasahm@taec.toshiba.com>
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 643
Lines: 19

Hello. I'm Masashi Sasahara @ Toshiba America, joined this
mailling-list today.

  I'm trying to install linux onto indy using vmlinux-970916-efs
and Linux-installer-0.1d which is on ftp.linux.sgi.com.
  Actually I failed to start "installer" so I extracted
root-be-0.03 by hand. So I managed to install everything in
root-be-0.01.cpio. but I'm having a problem on creating swap
area.

  As far as I searched in the archive of this mailing list,
mkswap should be in root-be-xxx distribution, right? But I
couldn't find that even in the older root-be- files in old/.

  Where can I get mkswap or how can I make swap?

Thanks,

Masashi Sasahara

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Fri Feb  6 16:42:02 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id QAA141576 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 16:42:02 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA28194 for linux-list; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 16:39:07 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA28153 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 16:39:02 -0800
Received: from lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (lager.engsoc.carleton.ca [134.117.69.26]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id QAA25373
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 16:38:57 -0800
	env-from (adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca)
Received: from localhost (adevries@localhost)
	by lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id TAA02654;
	Fri, 6 Feb 1998 19:40:00 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: lager.engsoc.carleton.ca: adevries owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 1998 19:40:00 -0500 (EST)
From: Alex deVries <adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca>
To: Masashi Sasahara/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOns4NkA1O0obKEI=?= <sasahm@taec.toshiba.com>
cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Trouble in making swap area
In-Reply-To: <199802062332.PAA27891@sol-x86-1.taec.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980206193645.7374B-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 826
Lines: 21

On Fri, 6 Feb 1998, Masashi Sasahara/[ISO-2022-JP] $B:{86@5;J(B wrote:
> 
>   I'm trying to install linux onto indy using vmlinux-970916-efs
> and Linux-installer-0.1d which is on ftp.linux.sgi.com.
>   Actually I failed to start "installer" so I extracted
> root-be-0.03 by hand. So I managed to install everything in
> root-be-0.01.cpio. but I'm having a problem on creating swap
> area.

Uh, are you using root-be 0.01, or 0.03?  I believe 0.03 has mkswap in it,
but 0.01 does not.

What happened when you tried to run the installer?

You probably don't need mkswap at this point anyway, since there really
aren't that many applications in root-be that will chew up that much
space.  The goal should be to put root-be on your filesystem, and from
there install all the RPMS (which contain mkswap in util-linux).

- Alex


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Fri Feb  6 17:44:40 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id RAA146881 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 17:44:40 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id RAA14833 for linux-list; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 17:42:07 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id RAA14818 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 17:42:01 -0800
Received: from godzilla.taec.com (godzilla.taec.com [204.162.152.130]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via SMTP id RAA13677
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 17:42:00 -0800
	env-from (sasahm@taec.toshiba.com)
Received: from mailint.taec.com by godzilla.taec.com
          via smtpd (for SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) with SMTP; 7 Feb 1998 01:42:00 UT
Received: from oita (oita.taec.com [198.232.207.41])
	by sol-x86-1.taec.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA03417
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 6 Feb 1998 17:41:59 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199802070141.RAA03417@sol-x86-1.taec.com>
To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Trouble in making swap area
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 6 Feb 1998 19:40:00 -0500 (EST)"
References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980206193645.7374B-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.68 on Emacs 19.28.1 / Mule 2.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 1998 17:41:59 -0800
From: Masashi Sasahara/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOns4NkA1O0obKEI=?=  <sasahm@taec.toshiba.com>
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1382
Lines: 38

Hi, Alex,

> >   I'm trying to install linux onto indy using vmlinux-970916-efs
> > and Linux-installer-0.1d which is on ftp.linux.sgi.com.
> >   Actually I failed to start "installer" so I extracted
> > root-be-0.03 by hand. So I managed to install everything in
> > root-be-0.01.cpio. but I'm having a problem on creating swap
> > area.
> 
> Uh, are you using root-be 0.01, or 0.03?  I believe 0.03 has mkswap in it,
> but 0.01 does not.

  Oh, I'm sorry. 0.01 way typo. I used 0.03.


> What happened when you tried to run the installer?

  It simply says "Command not found" though I could execute
other binaries like ls or whatever came with root-be-0.03.tar.gz.


> You probably don't need mkswap at this point anyway, since there really
> aren't that many applications in root-be that will chew up that much

 Oh, I should write more about where I am now.
 I booted linux kernel via tftp, made ext2 filesystem on indy's
drive, and I extracted root-be-0.03 by hand (because of
installer's problem), and installed RPM stuffs.

> space.  The goal should be to put root-be on your filesystem, and from
> there install all the RPMS (which contain mkswap in util-linux).
                              ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 Great! that's what I want to know!!
Maybe I haven't extracted that (or forgot to get).

 Thank you very much. I'll try that.

-Masashi Sasahara

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Sat Feb  7 01:16:57 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id BAA176322 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 7 Feb 1998 01:16:56 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id BAA10848 for linux-list; Sat, 7 Feb 1998 01:13:17 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id BAA10842 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 7 Feb 1998 01:13:15 -0800
Received: from godzilla.taec.com (godzilla.taec.com [204.162.152.130]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via SMTP id BAA03165
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 7 Feb 1998 01:13:15 -0800
	env-from (sasahm@taec.toshiba.com)
Received: from mailint.taec.com by godzilla.taec.com
          via smtpd (for SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) with SMTP; 7 Feb 1998 09:13:14 UT
Received: from oita (oita.taec.com [198.232.207.41])
	by sol-x86-1.taec.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id BAA10209
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 7 Feb 1998 01:13:04 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199802070913.BAA10209@sol-x86-1.taec.com>
To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Trouble in making swap area
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Fri, 06 Feb 1998 17:41:59 -0800"
References: <199802070141.RAA03417@sol-x86-1.taec.com>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.68 on Emacs 19.28.1 / Mule 2.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Sat, 07 Feb 1998 01:13:04 -0800
From: Masashi Sasahara/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOns4NkA1O0obKEI=?=  <sasahm@taec.toshiba.com>
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1222
Lines: 30

> > What happened when you tried to run the installer?
> 
>   It simply says "Command not found" though I could execute
> other binaries like ls or whatever came with root-be-0.03.tar.gz.

  I think I see what's happened.

  I extracted root-b-0.03.cpio come with Linux-installer-0.1d.tar.gz 
again and did "file ld*" in lib.
----------------------------
% file ld*
ld-2.0.4.so:    ELF 32-bit MSB dynamic lib MIPS RS3000 Big-Endian Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped
ld-linux.so.1:  ELF 32-bit LSB dynamic lib 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped
ld-linux.so.1.9.5:      ELF 32-bit LSB dynamic lib 80386 Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped
ld.so:          ELF 32-bit LSB executable 80386 Version 1, statically linked, not stripped
ld.so.1:        ELF 32-bit MSB dynamic lib MIPS RS3000 Big-Endian Version 1, dynamically linked, not stripped
ld.so.1.9.5:    ELF 32-bit LSB executable 80386 Version 1, statically linked, not stripped
-----------------

  Probably ld.so for x86 was called when I tried to start
installer.

# Why x86 is here???

  Anyway, I got mkswap from util-linux and everything is ok now.
(though I couldn't find it in root-be 0.03.)

  Thank you, Alex.

-Masashi Sasahara

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Wed Feb 11 01:32:24 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id BAA20879 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 01:32:24 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id BAA25220 for linux-list; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 01:30:44 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id BAA25214 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 01:30:43 -0800
Received: from informatik.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.4.1]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id BAA10576
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 01:30:40 -0800
	env-from (ralf@uni-koblenz.de)
From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
Received: from uni-koblenz.de (pmport-28.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.249.28])
	by informatik.uni-koblenz.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id KAA21638
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 10:30:37 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from ralf@localhost)
	by uni-koblenz.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id KAA09471;
	Wed, 11 Feb 1998 10:26:31 +0100
Message-ID: <19980211102631.43451@uni-koblenz.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 10:26:31 +0100
To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Commercial Linux/MIPS
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.85e
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1166
Lines: 27

On Tue, Feb 10, 1998 at 10:49:36PM -0800, Timothy Stonis wrote:

>   Just wanted to let you all know that Cobalt has officially announced
> it's Qube product which is based on Linux/MIPS. There's some information
> on the product at out website: http://www.cobaltmicro.com/. 
> 
>   We've been running our mail and website off our product for quite a
> while now without a hitch.
> 
>   We'll be shipping a developer version of the product at a rather
> agressive price point, which offers essentially a turnkey headless Linux
> box in a cute little package. The install is basically a Redhat one.
> 
>   And you'll be happy to know that much of the kernel work was done by the
> infamous Ralf...   

Infamous?!?  What???  Me?!?

>   Please feel free to forward me any questions you might have. Of course,
> what would a bunch of hackers do with a box like that? :-) 

There is going to be more commercial Linux/MIPS rsn.  Linux will control
NMR systems, including medical systems and systems for long time measurements
where failure is no option.  In those systems Linux will be the successor
of a modified Risc/OS 4.51 version.  Stay tuned for details ...

  Ralf

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Wed Feb 11 11:07:51 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id LAA23492 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 11:07:51 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id LAA07720 for linux-list; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 11:03:29 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA07653 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 11:03:19 -0800
Received: from informatik.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.4.1]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id LAA18982
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 11:03:16 -0800
	env-from (ralf@uni-koblenz.de)
From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
Received: from uni-koblenz.de (dali.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.5.1])
	by informatik.uni-koblenz.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA03229
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 20:03:14 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from ralf@localhost)
	by uni-koblenz.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA10483;
	Wed, 11 Feb 1998 19:59:53 +0100
Message-ID: <19980211195953.60622@uni-koblenz.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 19:59:53 +0100
To: "Michael L. Galbraith" <mikeg@weiden.de>
Cc: linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu,
        linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Commercial Linux/MIPS...
References: <19980211102010.31989@uni-koblenz.de> <Pine.LNX.3.95.980211193815.464A-100000@mikeg.weiden.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.85e
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980211193815.464A-100000@mikeg.weiden.de>; from Michael L. Galbraith on Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 07:42:55PM +0100
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1022
Lines: 24

On Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 07:42:55PM +0100, Michael L. Galbraith wrote:

> > There is going to be more commercial Linux/MIPS rsn.  Linux will control
> > NMR systems, including medical systems and systems for long time measurements
> > where failure is no option.  In those systems Linux will be the successor
> > of a modified Risc/OS 4.51 version.  Stay tuned for details ...
> > 
> >   Ralf
> 
> OOHA!,
> 
> URL's anyone? I have an RM400 (R4400/100) in need of a soul transplant.

That's yet another type of machine.  I've ported Linux to the SNI RM200C;
it should also run on the RM300.  The R400 is a SMP machine and I don't
have any data about it at all.  In fact, since so far nobody was so
generous to loan me a SMP box there isn't even MIPS SMP yet ...

But here is what _you_ can do: Call SNI and have a bit fun nervragging them
for Linux.  There are so many very different MIPS machines out there that
reverse engineering isn't a real option unless you solve the problem of
human immortability before :-(

  Ralf

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Wed Feb 11 13:00:29 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id NAA96308 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 13:00:29 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id MAA17747 for linux-list; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 12:57:50 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id MAA17716 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 12:57:44 -0800
Received: from informatik.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.4.1]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id MAA00124
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 12:57:43 -0800
	env-from (ralf@uni-koblenz.de)
From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
Received: from uni-koblenz.de (dali.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.5.1])
	by informatik.uni-koblenz.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id VAA08298
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 21:57:42 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from ralf@localhost)
	by uni-koblenz.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA10785;
	Wed, 11 Feb 1998 21:53:59 +0100
Message-ID: <19980211215359.48251@uni-koblenz.de>
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 21:53:59 +0100
To: Nat Friedman <ndf@ALEPH1.MIT.EDU>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com,
        linux-mips@fnet.fr
Subject: Re: PPro: Global flag in page table
References: <199802112027.PAA07668@ALEPH1.MIT.EDU>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.85e
In-Reply-To: <199802112027.PAA07668@ALEPH1.MIT.EDU>; from Nat Friedman on Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 03:27:50PM -0500
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 2665
Lines: 49

On Wed, Feb 11, 1998 at 03:27:50PM -0500, Nat Friedman wrote:

> I was just reading through some Intel docs and noticed that the Pentium Pro
> introduced a Global flag for for page table and page directory entries.  When
> this flag is set on an entry, and the PGE (Page Global Enable) flag is set
> in register CR4, the entry is not invalidated in the TLB on a task switch.
> My understanding of this is crude, so be gentle if I've misunderstood, but
> I don't think that this is implemented for Linux and was wondering if the
> benefits warranted implementing it.
> 
> Miguel tells me that a similar tactic is implemented in the MIPS port - it 
> might be nice for PPro to have it too.

No, we don't use that feature on MIPS.  It could be used for the
pagetables for kernel virtual memory - but we currently don't use it,
mainly because it would make flushing the TLB more complex because would
have to examine every entry before we might flush it.  Basically it would
be a tradeoff between the costs of an increased number page faults for
pagetable entries for kernel virtual memory and the increased costs for
a more complex TLB flush routine.  I haven't done detailed profiling on
that but my stomach says that trying to avoid the added complexity by
using the global bit is actually making things faster.  I suppose this
would be different on the PPro.

There is another strategy which the MIPS port is using to avoid the cost
of having to flush and possibly reload the TLB entries on MIPS.  On MIPS
each TLB entry has an additional 6 bit (R2000, R3000 series) / 8 bit
(R4000 and up) field that contains something called process id / address
space identifier.  That field basicaly allows to tag TLB entries such
that there is in most cases no need to flush the entire TLB on context
switches.

With respect to the global bit in TLB entries this means that we may
have multiple entries for the same kernel virtual address in the TLB,
just with a different PID / ASID tag.

(PID / ASID is the same thing; it's just a different naming for the 32 bit
and 64 bit implementations of the MIPS architecture)

A feature we do use on MIPS is the KSEG0.  KSEG0 ("Kernel SEGment 0") is
an area in the virtual address space at 0x80000000 of 512mb size which is
1:1 mapped to physical addresses from 0 upwards.  KSEG0 is probably best
compared with the transparent translation registers of the 68030 with the
big difference that it cannot be disabled and the only thing that can be
configured for KSEG0 is the caching mode the CPU uses to access the main
memory.  KSEG0 is actually a nice win because the topic of TLB faults for
kernel memory is non-issue on MIPS.

  Ralf

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Wed Feb 11 21:03:06 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id VAA143797 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 21:03:06 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id VAA27319 for linux-list; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 21:00:12 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id VAA27306 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 21:00:10 -0800
Received: from informatik.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.4.1]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id VAA02746
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 21:00:09 -0800
	env-from (ralf@uni-koblenz.de)
From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
Received: from uni-koblenz.de (pmport-06.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.249.6])
	by informatik.uni-koblenz.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id GAA02621
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 06:00:06 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from ralf@localhost)
	by uni-koblenz.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id FAA11617;
	Thu, 12 Feb 1998 05:56:48 +0100
Message-ID: <19980212055648.54198@uni-koblenz.de>
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 05:56:48 +0100
To: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: TLB entries > 4kb
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.85e
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 679
Lines: 13

Some architectures can use multiple page sizes in the TLB at the same time.
This would for example allow to map memory allocations > PAGE_SIZE using just
a single TLB entry if the circumstances are just right, thereby
reducing / eleminating TLB trashing.  This should improve the performance
for huge apps quite a bit.  Some architectures could partially get rid of
the sick effects of their virtual indexed primary caches as well.  All that
is needed for this to work is to have sufficiently large physical pages with
sufficient alignment at hand.

Has anybody ever looked into implementing that?  What architectures besides
MIPS could take advantage of such a feature?

  Ralf

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Wed Feb 11 22:00:03 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id WAA154789 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 22:00:03 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id VAA04682 for linux-list; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 21:54:34 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id VAA04668 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 21:54:28 -0800
Received: from dm.cobaltmicro.com (dm.cobaltmicro.com [209.133.34.35]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id VAA16355
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 11 Feb 1998 21:54:27 -0800
	env-from (davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com)
Received: (from davem@localhost)
	by dm.cobaltmicro.com (8.8.7/8.8.7) id VAA23879;
	Wed, 11 Feb 1998 21:50:12 -0800
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 1998 21:50:12 -0800
Message-Id: <199802120550.VAA23879@dm.cobaltmicro.com>
From: "David S. Miller" <davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com>
To: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
CC: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <19980212055648.54198@uni-koblenz.de> (ralf@uni-koblenz.de)
Subject: Re: TLB entries > 4kb
References:  <19980212055648.54198@uni-koblenz.de>
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 445
Lines: 13

   From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
   Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 05:56:48 +0100

   Has anybody ever looked into implementing that?  What architectures
   besides MIPS could take advantage of such a feature?

We already use it on Sparc64 for mmap()'ing the frame buffers, we
could easily extend it to work for mmap()'s of real memory.  Check out
arch/sparc64/mm/generic.c in the vger CVS tree for details.

Later,
David S. Miller
davem@dm.cobaltmicro.com

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 12 00:58:40 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id AAA164544 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 00:58:40 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id AAA02022 for linux-list; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 00:51:00 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id AAA02008 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 00:50:50 -0800
Received: from snowcrash.cymru.net (snowcrash.cymru.net [163.164.160.3]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id AAA03808
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 00:50:48 -0800
	env-from (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk (the-village.bc.nu [163.164.160.21]) by snowcrash.cymru.net (8.8.7/8.7.1) with SMTP id IAA23062; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 08:50:31 GMT
Received: by lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk (Smail3.1.29.1 #2)
	id m0y2uMG-0005FsC; Thu, 12 Feb 98 08:51 GMT
Message-Id: <m0y2uMG-0005FsC@lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk>
From: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox)
Subject: Re: TLB entries > 4kb
To: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 08:51:00 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
In-Reply-To: <19980212055648.54198@uni-koblenz.de> from "ralf@uni-koblenz.de" at Feb 12, 98 05:56:48 am
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 354
Lines: 7

> Has anybody ever looked into implementing that?  What architectures besides
> MIPS could take advantage of such a feature?

On the intel its a huge win to map PCI frame buffers using 4Mbyte pages, but
the kernel mmap really can't hack the idea right now. A pity cos if you
hack it in and make sure you never unmap it you get 2-3% better X performance


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 12 04:14:16 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id EAA180669 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 04:14:16 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id EAA18261 for linux-list; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 04:10:56 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id EAA18256 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 04:10:54 -0800
Received: from mario.gams.at (mario.gams.at [194.42.96.10]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id EAA21199
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 04:10:51 -0800
	env-from (mla@gams.co.at)
Received: from bononunu.gams.co.at (mail.gams.co.at [193.46.232.10])
	by mario.gams.at (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA04408;
	Thu, 12 Feb 1998 13:10:06 +0100
Received: from loki.gams.co.at (loki.gams.co.at [193.46.232.130]) by bononunu.gams.co.at (8.7.1/8.7.3) with ESMTP id NAA24024; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 13:10:04 +0100
Received: from loki.gams.co.at (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by loki.gams.co.at (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id NAA25532;
	Thu, 12 Feb 1998 13:10:03 +0100
Message-Id: <199802121210.NAA25532@loki.gams.co.at>
To: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
cc: linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: TLB entries > 4kb 
In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 12 Feb 1998 05:56:48 +0100."
             <19980212055648.54198@uni-koblenz.de> 
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 13:10:02 +0100
From: Michael Lausch <mla@gams.co.at>
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1094
Lines: 24

>>>>> "r" == ralf  <ralf@uni-koblenz.de>
>>>>> wrote the following on Thu, 12 Feb 1998 05:56:48 +0100

r> Some architectures can use multiple page sizes in the TLB at the same time.
r> This would for example allow to map memory allocations > PAGE_SIZE using just
r> a single TLB entry if the circumstances are just right, thereby
r> reducing / eleminating TLB trashing.  This should improve the performance
r> for huge apps quite a bit.  Some architectures could partially get rid of
r> the sick effects of their virtual indexed primary caches as well.  All that
r> is needed for this to work is to have sufficiently large physical pages with
r> sufficient alignment at hand.

r> Has anybody ever looked into implementing that?  What architectures besides
r> MIPS could take advantage of such a feature?

The MPC860. We now have 8 MByte Page Table entries for the Kernel Address
Space and the Dual Ported RAM used to communicate with the CPM.

r>   Ralf

r> -
r> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
r> the body of a message to majordomo@vger.rutgers.edu


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 12 10:05:53 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id KAA198252 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 10:05:53 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id KAA22806 for linux-list; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 10:01:57 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id KAA22676 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 10:01:35 -0800
Received: from chiara.csoma.elte.hu (chiara.csoma.elte.hu [157.181.71.18]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id KAA02200
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 10:01:24 -0800
	env-from (mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu)
Received: from localhost (mingo@localhost)
	by chiara.csoma.elte.hu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id TAA28155;
	Thu, 12 Feb 1998 19:00:41 +0100
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 19:00:41 +0100 (CET)
From: MOLNAR Ingo <mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu>
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
cc: ralf@uni-koblenz.de, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu,
        linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: TLB entries > 4kb
In-Reply-To: <m0y2uMG-0005FsC@lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980212185923.27931A-100000@chiara.csoma.elte.hu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 582
Lines: 16


On Thu, 12 Feb 1998, Alan Cox wrote:

> > Has anybody ever looked into implementing that?  What architectures besides
> > MIPS could take advantage of such a feature?
> 
> On the intel its a huge win to map PCI frame buffers using 4Mbyte pages, but
> the kernel mmap really can't hack the idea right now. A pity cos if you
> hack it in and make sure you never unmap it you get 2-3% better X performance

i tried to hack this half a year ago, but had to find out that 4MB pages
are only valid for kernel mappings, which means we'd have to make X a ring
0 process too ...

-- mingo


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 12 13:59:02 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id NAA213723 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 13:59:02 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA20756 for linux-list; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 13:55:42 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA20546 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 13:55:11 -0800
Received: from mauve.csi.cam.ac.uk (mauve.csi.cam.ac.uk [131.111.8.38]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via SMTP id NAA28242
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 13:55:08 -0800
	env-from (Dave@imladris.demon.co.uk)
Received: from dwmw2.robinson.cam.ac.uk (imladris.demon.co.uk) [131.111.217.153] (exim)
	by mauve.csi.cam.ac.uk with smtp (Exim 1.82 #1)
	id 0y36aE-0004Js-00; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 21:54:14 +0000
Received: from localhost (dwmw2.robinson.cam.ac.uk) [127.0.0.1] (dwmw2)
	by imladris.demon.co.uk with esmtp (Exim 1.82 #9)
	id 0y36YO-00042j-00; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 21:52:20 +0000
X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0zeta 7/24/97
To: MOLNAR Ingo <mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu>
Cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, ralf@uni-koblenz.de,
        linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: TLB entries > 4kb 
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 21:52:19 +0000
From: David Woodhouse <Dave@imladris.demon.co.uk>
Message-Id: <E0y36YO-00042j-00@imladris.demon.co.uk>
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1086
Lines: 33


mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu said:
> On Thu, 12 Feb 1998, Alan Cox wrote:
> > On the intel its a huge win to map PCI frame buffers using 4Mbyte pages, but
> > the kernel mmap really can't hack the idea right now. A pity cos if you
> > hack it in and make sure you never unmap it you get 2-3% better X 
> > performance
> 
> i tried to hack this half a year ago, but had to find out that 4MB pages
> are only valid for kernel mappings, which means we'd have to make X a ring
> 0 process too ...

---------------

alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk said:
>  The way its done is ok normally. I guess you need to make X over
> Linux/RT call the rtlinux kernel to handle it. Note X _has_ to do
> those global cli/sti's to meet hardware needs

---------------


GGI (well, KGI) should be able to fix both of these, shouldn't it?




----                              ----                              ----
David Woodhouse, Robinson College, CB3 9AN, England.   (+44) 0976 658355
    Dave@imladris.demon.co.uk        http://dwmw2.robinson.cam.ac.uk
	    finger pgp@dwmw2.robinson.cam.ac.uk for PGP key.



From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 12 13:59:04 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id NAA214278 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 13:59:04 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA21215 for linux-list; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 13:57:06 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA21201 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 13:57:05 -0800
Received: from snowcrash.cymru.net (snowcrash.cymru.net [163.164.160.3]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id NAA29211
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 13:57:03 -0800
	env-from (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Received: from lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk (the-village.bc.nu [163.164.160.21]) by snowcrash.cymru.net (8.8.7/8.7.1) with SMTP id VAA06027; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 21:56:20 GMT
Received: by lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk (Smail3.1.29.1 #2)
	id m0y36d2-0005FsC; Thu, 12 Feb 98 21:57 GMT
Message-Id: <m0y36d2-0005FsC@lightning.swansea.linux.org.uk>
From: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox)
Subject: Re: TLB entries > 4kb
To: Dave@imladris.demon.co.uk (David Woodhouse)
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 21:57:07 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu, alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk, ralf@uni-koblenz.de,
        linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
In-Reply-To: <E0y36YO-00042j-00@imladris.demon.co.uk> from "David Woodhouse" at Feb 12, 98 09:52:19 pm
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 388
Lines: 9

> >  The way its done is ok normally. I guess you need to make X over
> > Linux/RT call the rtlinux kernel to handle it. Note X _has_ to do
> > those global cli/sti's to meet hardware needs
> 
> GGI (well, KGI) should be able to fix both of these, shouldn't it?

Not for Linux/RT - the kernel cant do real cli/sti pairs. The stuff
would have to become an RTLinux graphics setup call set


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 12 14:02:11 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id OAA214053 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 14:02:10 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA22747 for linux-list; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 14:01:01 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA22732 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 14:00:58 -0800
Received: from chiara.csoma.elte.hu (chiara.csoma.elte.hu [157.181.71.18]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id OAA00956
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 14:00:55 -0800
	env-from (mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu)
Received: from localhost (mingo@localhost)
	by chiara.csoma.elte.hu (8.8.5/8.8.5) with SMTP id XAA05135;
	Thu, 12 Feb 1998 23:00:09 +0100
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 23:00:09 +0100 (CET)
From: MOLNAR Ingo <mingo@chiara.csoma.elte.hu>
To: David Woodhouse <Dave@imladris.demon.co.uk>
cc: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>, ralf@uni-koblenz.de,
        linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: TLB entries > 4kb 
In-Reply-To: <E0y36YO-00042j-00@imladris.demon.co.uk>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980212225556.4223D-100000@chiara.csoma.elte.hu>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 545
Lines: 16


On Thu, 12 Feb 1998, David Woodhouse wrote:

> GGI (well, KGI) should be able to fix both of these, shouldn't it?

the hw virtualization (cli/sti) thing yes, but the 4MB thing not, as
GGILib lives in user-space, GGI does not spend too much time in the
kernel, rendering is done in user-space.

but i suspect things doing direct rendering like Quake could benefit from
4MB pages big time. For this we have to implement ring-0 processes though
... XFree86 is nicely accelerated (and the accelerator chip has no
business with the CPU).

-- mingo


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 12 23:54:04 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id XAA271046 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 23:54:04 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id XAA02466 for linux-list; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 23:49:38 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id XAA02449 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 23:49:32 -0800
Received: from thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (thorgal.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.40.91]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id XAA15608
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 12 Feb 1998 23:49:30 -0800
	env-from (bakker@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl)
Received: from [130.161.115.44] (jdbakker.et.tudelft.nl [130.161.115.44])
	by thorgal.et.tudelft.nl (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id IAA09517;
	Fri, 13 Feb 1998 08:48:22 +0100
Message-Id: <v0313030ab108e9ffdbdb@[130.161.40.82]>
In-Reply-To: <199802121210.NAA25532@loki.gams.co.at>
References: Your message of "Thu, 12 Feb 1998 05:56:48 +0100."            
 <19980212055648.54198@uni-koblenz.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Date: Thu, 12 Feb 1998 23:05:11 +0100
To: Michael Lausch <mla@gams.co.at>
From: "J.D. Bakker" <bakker@thorgal.et.tudelft.nl>
Subject: Re: TLB entries > 4kb
Cc: ralf@uni-koblenz.de, linux-kernel@vger.rutgers.edu,
        linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 636
Lines: 17

>r> Has anybody ever looked into implementing that?  What architectures besides
>r> MIPS could take advantage of such a feature?
>
>The MPC860. We now have 8 MByte Page Table entries for the Kernel Address
>Space and the Dual Ported RAM used to communicate with the CPM.

...and the IBM PPC403GC/GCX. Variable page sizes between 1k and 16M (in
eight steps, variable per TLB IIRC). This MMU, "designed for embedded apps"
according to IBM, also handles the process ID per TLB that Ralf mentioned
on the MIPS.

JDB (hunting for round tuits for that PPC board design)

Jan-Derk Bakker
Official Usenet Net.scum; see http://www.netscum.net



From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Mon Feb 16 13:50:28 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id NAA196563 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 13:50:27 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA09974 for linux-list; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 13:47:11 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA09919 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 13:47:10 -0800
Received: from mtigwc05.worldnet.att.net (mtigwc05.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.35]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id NAA21280
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Mon, 16 Feb 1998 13:47:04 -0800
	env-from (bizbuild@worldnet.att.net)
From: bizbuild@worldnet.att.net
Received: from mailhost.worldnet.att.net ([12.68.110.34])
          by mtigwc05.worldnet.att.net (post.office MTA v2.0 0613 )
          with SMTP id ABD29913 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>;
          Mon, 16 Feb 1998 21:47:02 +0000
To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Date: Sun, 15 Feb 98 16:54:44 EST
Subject: A Message Regarding Your Website
Message-ID: <19980216214530.ABD29913@mailhost.worldnet.att.net>
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 3191
Lines: 31

Hi, I found you from visiting your website. I noticed that you were selling a product or a service. I have been helping businesses ELIMINATE THE NEED TO FILE A TAX RETURN by setting up the business as a Pure Trust. And I have copies of letters from the IRS that document this position.

A Pure Trust is based on Constitutional Law, and as such, is not under the jurisdiction of any government agency, including the IRS (We have a 20 page report to send you on this). Basically, once you set up your business under a Pure Trust, you gain the following advantages:

* No need to file a business tax return or face an audit
* Asset Protection from seizures, judgements, lawsuits, bankruptcy and other disasters
* No need to pay self employment taxes on business income
* The ability to receive an annual gift of $10,000 each for you and your spouse tax free 
* The ability to open up a checking account under the name of the Trust

A Pure Trust can replace a Corporation or a Partnership. It also prevents you from getting sued personally for things your business does. It also saves you a lot of time and money by not having to figure out every deduction you are going to try to take to reduce your taxes. If you have just $10,000 in business profit, you will save $1500 in self employment taxes alone by not having to file a return!

As I said, we have copies of actual letters from the IRS documenting this position. This is not some right-wing radical anti-tax campaign. It is simply an education of your right to contract under Article 10 of the US Constitution. We are also not advocating not filing a personal tax return either, simply using a loophole of the IRS to structure your business in a way that they will agree has no tax reporting requirements.

If you set up your business as a Pure Trust, there are certain rules you must follow to maintain the purity of the trust. We teach you all those in our package. We have put together a package for you that contains the following:

* A copy of the IRS letters
* How to apply for a Tax ID # without the need for a filing requirement
* A 20 page report on how the Pure Trust benefits you and your family
* The actual Pure Trust package on disk (produce as many as you need)

The total price of this package is $195. If you are going to pay more than this in Federal Taxes, you would be wise to purchase it. As a bonus, if you are marketing on the Internet, we will include the following freebies:

* The ability to accept checks over the Internet directly without the need to print up checks. We are waiving the normal $50 set up fee. There is NO monthly fee for this, only a 75 cent transaction charge.

* A secure order form for your product(s) that you sell on the Internet. We are waiving our normal $50 set up fee. There is NO monthly fee, only a $1 per transaction charge.

If you are interested in this, please call our 24 hour voice mail line at 215-552-8927. I would say send me an email, but someone will probably get my account cancelled, even though I am not sending out mass email. Please note that you are not on any list. I simply found your web page and am sending you this message.

Thanks again for your attention.


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Tue Feb 17 07:24:36 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id HAA351676 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 07:24:36 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id HAA10619 for linux-list; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 07:24:02 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id HAA10610 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 07:24:00 -0800
Received: from mtigwc04.worldnet.att.net (mtigwc04.worldnet.att.net [204.127.131.33]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id HAA15137
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 07:23:59 -0800
	env-from (bizbuild@worldnet.att.net)
Received: from default ([12.68.111.172]) by mtigwc04.worldnet.att.net
          (post.office MTA v2.0 0613 ) with SMTP id AHQ2524
          for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Tue, 17 Feb 1998 15:23:52 +0000
From: Tony Glavin <bizbuild@worldnet.att.net>
To: <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Reply-To: mailhost.worldnet.att.net@worldnet.att.net
Subject:  A Comment Regarding Your WebSite
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 17 Feb 1998 15:23:52 +0000
Message-ID: <19980217151527.AHQ2524@default>
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 3275
Lines: 74

Hi, I found you from visiting your website. I noticed that you=
 were selling a product or a service. I have been helping=
 businesses ELIMINATE THE NEED TO FILE A TAX RETURN by setting up=
 the business as a Pure Trust. And I have copies of letters from=
 the IRS that document this position.

A Pure Trust is based on Constitutuinal Law, and as such, is not=
 under the jurisdiction of any government agency, including the=
 IRS (We have a 20 page report to send you on this). Basically,=
 once you set up your business under a Pure Trust, you gain the=
 following advantages:

* No need to file a business tax return or face an audit
* Asset Protection from seizures, judgements, lawsuits,=
 bankruptcy and other disasters
* No need to pay self employment taxes on business income
* The ability to receive an annual gift of $10,000 each for you=
 and your spouse tax free
* The ability to open up a checking account under the name of the=
 Trust

A Pure Trust can replace a Corporation or a Partnership. It also=
 prevents you from getting sued personally for things your=
 business does. It also saves you a lot of time and money by not=
 having to figure out every deduction you are going to try to=
 take to reduce your taxes. If you have just $10,000 in business=
 profit, you will save $1500 in self employment taxes alone by=
 not having to file a return!

As I said, we have copies of actual letters from the IRS=
 documenting this position. This is not some right-wing radical=
 anti-tax campaign. It is simply an education of your right to=
 contract under Article 10 of the US Constitution. We are also=
 not advocating not filing a personal tax return either, simply=
 using a loophole of the IRS to structure your business in a way=
 that they will agree has no tax reporting requirements.

If you set up your business as a Pure Trust, there are certain=
 rules you must follow to maintain the purity of the trust. We=
 teach you all those in our package. We have put together a=
 package for you that contains the following:

* A copy of the IRS letters
* How to apply for a Tax ID # without the need for a filing=
 requirement
* A 20 page report on how the Pure Trust benefits you and your=
 family
* The actual Pure Trust package on disk (produce as many as you=
 need)

The total price of this package is $195. If you are going to pay=
 more than this in Federal Taxes, you would be wise to purchase=
 it. As a bonus, if you are marketing on the Internet, we will=
 include the following freebies:

* The ability to accept checks over the Internet directly without=
 the need to print up checks. We are waiving the normal $50 set=
 up fee. There is NO monthly fee for this, only a 75 cent=
 transaction charge.

* A secure order form for your product(s) that you sell on the=
 Internet. We are waiving our normal $50 set up fee. There is NO=
 monthly fee, only a $1 per transaction charge.

If you are interested in this, please call our 24 hour voice mail=
 line at 215-552-8927. I would say send me an email, but someone=
 will probably get my account cancelled, even though I am not=
 sending out mass email. Please note that you are NOT on any=
 list. I simply found your web page and am sending you this=
 message.

Thanks again for your attention.



From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 19 15:26:02 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id PAA48255 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 15:26:02 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA03533 for linux-list; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 15:25:05 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA03519 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 15:25:03 -0800
Received: from informatik.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.4.1]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id PAA03754
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 15:25:01 -0800
	env-from (ralf@uni-koblenz.de)
From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
Received: from uni-koblenz.de (pmport-26.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.249.26])
	by informatik.uni-koblenz.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id AAA25538
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 20 Feb 1998 00:24:58 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from ralf@localhost)
	by uni-koblenz.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id AAA10525;
	Thu, 19 Feb 1998 00:47:50 +0100
Message-ID: <19980219004750.26917@uni-koblenz.de>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 00:47:50 +0100
To: Tatsuya Nakamura <tatsuya@na.kubota.co.jp>
Cc: linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu,
        linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: Is Magnum 4000 supported?
References: <19980218095700L.tatsuya@na.kubota.co.jp>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.85e
In-Reply-To: <19980218095700L.tatsuya@na.kubota.co.jp>; from Tatsuya Nakamura on Wed, Feb 18, 1998 at 09:57:00AM +0900
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1004
Lines: 30

On Wed, Feb 18, 1998 at 09:57:00AM +0900, Tatsuya Nakamura wrote:

> I try to use of Linux/MIPS on MIPS Magnum 4000 system.
> 
> I tried some versions kernel, and some configuration.
> 
> But, 2.1.XX kernel didn't show some message to console.
> The 2.0.21 kernel could show message to console, but it didn't work
> fine.
> 
> 2.0.21 kernel stopped after ethernet information displaing,
> and appear this message:
> 
> Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00000004, epc == ffffffff8005ac5c
> $0: ........
> 
> MIPS Magnum 4000 system does not tested?

The development is actually being done by somebody who's using an OEM
version of the Magnum 4000, the Olivetti M700-10.  But that machine is
99.9% identical.

Question: do you know if you have a Magnum 4000SC?  The SC CPU version is
quite a bit faster but the support for it is broken in the kernels you've
tested.

What resolution is you machine running at?  Milo and the kernel only support
the lowres mode (1024 x 768).

  Ralf

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Wed Feb 18 19:12:41 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id TAA364395 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 1998 19:12:41 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id TAA16320 for linux-list; Wed, 18 Feb 1998 19:11:53 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id TAA16315 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 1998 19:11:52 -0800
Received: from terminator2.xtra.co.nz (terminator2.xtra.co.nz [202.27.184.2]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id TAA08895
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 1998 19:11:50 -0800
	env-from (ratfink@xtra.co.nz)
Received: from xtra.co.nz (xtra185187.xtra.co.nz [202.27.185.187])
	by terminator2.xtra.co.nz (8.8.8/8.8.6) with ESMTP id QAA16837
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 19 Feb 1998 16:11:11 +1300 (NZDT)
Message-ID: <34EBA0DD.8A794A6D@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 16:02:53 +1300
From: Brendan Black <ratfink@xtra.co.nz>
Organization: Acess Denied...
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.0.33 i586)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: L4 microkernel on MIPS R4x00 freely available in source form
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=x-UNICODE-2-0-UTF-7
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 977
Lines: 23

I thought a few people might be interested in this, it is reported to
run on R4600 Indy
and some of you may know that Linux has been ported to the Intel version
of L4

see http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/+AH4-disy/L4/ for the MIPS version info

and http://os.inf.tu-dresden.de/L4/ for the original L4 page

sorry to those of you who either think this is off, or object to
microkernels in general, but as the source code to this is available, I
thought it may be useful

regards
-- 
Brendan Black - Network Engineer, Telecom Internet Services
email:	ratfink@xtra.co.nz (personal)	phone: +-649 3555238
	                                mob:   +-6425 2752667
The word "spine" is, of course, an anagram of "penis".  This is true in
almost fifty percent of the languages of the Galaxy, and many people
have attempted to explain why.  Usually these explanations get bogged
down in silly puns about "standing erect".
                -- Douglas Adams, "The Hitchhiker's Guide to the Galaxy"

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Wed Feb 18 19:47:46 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id TAA378479 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 1998 19:47:46 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id TAA23272 for linux-list; Wed, 18 Feb 1998 19:47:05 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id TAA23262 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 1998 19:47:03 -0800
Received: from note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU (note.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU [129.94.242.29]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via SMTP id TAA15676
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 18 Feb 1998 19:47:01 -0800
	env-from (conradp@cse.unsw.edu.au)
Received: From haydn With LocalMail ; Thu, 19 Feb 98 14:46:30 +1100 
From: "K." <conradp@cse.unsw.edu.au>
To: Brendan Black <ratfink@xtra.co.nz>
Date: Thu, 19 Feb 1998 14:46:30 +1100 (EST)
X-Sender: conradp@haydn.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU
cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: L4 microkernel on MIPS R4x00 freely available in source form
In-Reply-To: <34EBA0DD.8A794A6D@xtra.co.nz>
Message-ID: <Pine.GSO.3.95.980219143200.18049F-100000@haydn.orchestra.cse.unsw.EDU.AU>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 865
Lines: 24

On Thu, 19 Feb 1998, Brendan Black wrote:

> I thought a few people might be interested in this, it is reported to
> run on R4600 Indy and some of you may know that Linux has been ported to
> the Intel version of L4
> 
> see http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/+AH4-disy/L4/ for the MIPS version info

http://www.cse.unsw.edu.au/~disy/L4/

We (myself and Andrew O'Brien) are working on the Linux port to L4/MIPS. 
We are currently working on a custom 4600 board (not on an Indy, but the
L4 servers are compatible). L4/MIPS is subtly different to L4/Intel
(different system calls) so don't expect the L4/Intel port to work out of
the box.

If anyone is interested in the Linux port, let us know. The L4/MIPS source
(developed by Kevin Elphinstone) is available under GPL at the above
address. 


Conrad Parker  conradp@cse.unsw.edu.au
Andrew O'Brien andrewo@cse.unsw.edu.au


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Sun Feb 22 23:22:36 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id XAA280256 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Sun, 22 Feb 1998 23:22:36 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id XAB21123 for linux-list; Sun, 22 Feb 1998 23:22:02 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id XAA21116 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Sun, 22 Feb 1998 23:22:01 -0800
Received: from netscape.com (h-205-217-237-47.netscape.com [205.217.237.47]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id XAA11249
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Sun, 22 Feb 1998 23:22:00 -0800
	env-from (shaver@netscape.com)
Received: from dredd.mcom.com (dredd.mcom.com [205.217.237.54])
	by netscape.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id XAA05081
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Sun, 22 Feb 1998 23:21:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netscape.com ([205.217.243.3]) by dredd.mcom.com
          (Netscape Messaging Server 3.5)  with ESMTP id AAAAF4
          for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Sun, 22 Feb 1998 23:21:59 -0800
Message-ID: <34F11DB9.C00393AF@netscape.com>
Date: Sun, 22 Feb 1998 22:56:57 -0800
From: Mike Shaver <shaver@netscape.com>
Organization: Package Reflectors
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.02 [en] (X11; U; IRIX 6.2 IP22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: netscape-communicator-5.0-1.mips.rpm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 395
Lines: 10

(No, not yet...)

The client build team has asked me to set up a Linux/Indy system for
them to do some preliminary porting work on, so I'd like to make sure
that we don't spend time working around previously-fixed bugs.  Do
people have patches (especiall libc patches!) lying around that they can
offer up?  Better still would be actual binaries, etc., but this beggar
won't be a chooser!

Mike

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Mon Feb 23 06:18:52 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id GAA292625 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 1998 06:18:52 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id GAA03783 for linux-list; Mon, 23 Feb 1998 06:15:51 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id GAA03778 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 1998 06:15:50 -0800
Received: from lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (lager.engsoc.carleton.ca [134.117.69.26]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id GAA24570
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 1998 06:15:48 -0800
	env-from (adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca)
Received: from localhost (adevries@localhost)
	by lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id JAA11442;
	Mon, 23 Feb 1998 09:15:47 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: lager.engsoc.carleton.ca: adevries owned process doing -bs
Date: Mon, 23 Feb 1998 09:15:47 -0500 (EST)
From: Alex deVries <adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca>
To: Mike Shaver <shaver@netscape.com>
cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: netscape-communicator-5.0-1.mips.rpm
In-Reply-To: <34F11DB9.C00393AF@netscape.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980223091239.9744A-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 737
Lines: 18

On Sun, 22 Feb 1998, Mike Shaver wrote:
> The client build team has asked me to set up a Linux/Indy system for
> them to do some preliminary porting work on, so I'd like to make sure
> that we don't spend time working around previously-fixed bugs.  Do
> people have patches (especiall libc patches!) lying around that they can
> offer up?  Better still would be actual binaries, etc., but this beggar
> won't be a chooser!

I believe the binaries you should use are:
- glibc 2.0.6 RPMs from
   ftp://ftp.linux.sgi.com/pub/redhat/redhat-4.9.1/RPMS/mips-linux/*
- all the other RPMs from 
   ftp://ftp.linux.sgi.com/pub/redhat/redhat-5.0/RPMS/mips-linux/*

And you're welcome to use alex3 if you're having problems booting up. :)

- Alex


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Mon Feb 23 11:15:15 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id LAA309107 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 1998 11:15:15 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id LAA24521 for linux-list; Mon, 23 Feb 1998 11:13:27 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA24504 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 1998 11:13:25 -0800
Received: from socsci.auc.dk (bentley.socsci.auc.dk [130.225.60.48]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id LAA12059
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Mon, 23 Feb 1998 11:13:23 -0800
	env-from (mkp@socsci.auc.dk)
Received: from jaguar.socsci.auc.dk (mkp@jaguar.socsci.auc.dk [130.225.60.49])
	by socsci.auc.dk (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id UAA03421;
	Mon, 23 Feb 1998 20:13:21 +0100
Received: (from mkp@localhost)
	by jaguar.socsci.auc.dk (8.8.8/8.8.8) id UAA16307;
	Mon, 23 Feb 1998 20:11:26 +0100
To: ariel@sgi.com
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Linux/SGI Mirror
Organization: Computing Dept. 1&2, Aalborg University
X-Face: ({%T;F${m<}wr[*K`gT|vs1m&kDfl(^PsxTnmb)FL4<KU0dsk*ebU1y~qsqb*yJv1KjHfK: 7:w~Iz''8)risf1f59v:Yfb_lRr1g7>!_$=dj|NG~.SNrq-qxsT]}i>DP.("XEmucViR>9iEl?,!C1 2p,ST@1)zEW+Kb'iJ,c6~O`BWjCoY42jmV
From: Martin Kasper Petersen <mkp@socsci.auc.dk>
Date: 23 Feb 1998 20:11:26 +0100
Message-ID: <yq1btvyp25d.fsf@jaguar.socsci.auc.dk>
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.4.65/XEmacs 19.15
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 402
Lines: 15


Quite a few months has passed since I first promised you a mirror of
the Linux/SGI-stuff on SunSITE Denmark.

I am pleased to announce that our StorageArray is back from repairs
(finally!) and we now mirror linus at

	ftp://sunsite.auc.dk/pub/os/linux/mips/sgi/

Enjoy,
Martin

-- 
Martin Kasper Petersen			BOFH, IC1&2, Aalborg University, DK
mailto:mkp@SunSITE.auc.dk		http://www.socsci.auc.dk/~mkp/

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Tue Feb 24 13:06:15 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id NAA442277 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 1998 13:06:15 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA26960 for linux-list; Tue, 24 Feb 1998 13:04:37 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA26950 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 1998 13:04:35 -0800
Received: from informatik.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.4.1]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id NAA21165
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 1998 13:04:33 -0800
	env-from (ralf@uni-koblenz.de)
From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
Received: from uni-koblenz.de (pmport-07.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.249.7])
	by informatik.uni-koblenz.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id WAA06627
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Tue, 24 Feb 1998 22:04:27 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from ralf@localhost)
	by uni-koblenz.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id HAA00497;
	Tue, 24 Feb 1998 07:30:57 +0100
Message-ID: <19980224073056.35213@uni-koblenz.de>
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 1998 07:30:56 +0100
To: Mike Shaver <shaver@netscape.com>
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: netscape-communicator-5.0-1.mips.rpm
References: <34F11DB9.C00393AF@netscape.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.85e
In-Reply-To: <34F11DB9.C00393AF@netscape.com>; from Mike Shaver on Sun, Feb 22, 1998 at 10:56:57PM -0800
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 531
Lines: 14

On Sun, Feb 22, 1998 at 10:56:57PM -0800, Mike Shaver wrote:

> (No, not yet...)
> 
> The client build team has asked me to set up a Linux/Indy system for
> them to do some preliminary porting work on, so I'd like to make sure
> that we don't spend time working around previously-fixed bugs.  Do
> people have patches (especiall libc patches!) lying around that they can
> offer up?  Better still would be actual binaries, etc., but this beggar
> won't be a chooser!

Can we arrange for a second, little endian version ?-)

  Ralf

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Wed Feb 25 12:57:21 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id MAA497299 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 12:57:21 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id MAA04830 for linux-list; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 12:55:55 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id MAA04819 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 12:55:54 -0800
Received: from seaside2.varberg.se (mail.varberg.se [193.13.151.101]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id MAA25537
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 12:55:53 -0800
	env-from (grimsy@seaside.se)
Received: from calypso.saturn (grimsy@dialup178-4-45.swipnet.se [130.244.178.237]) by seaside2.varberg.se (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA12103 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 21:01:30 GMT
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 21:57:43 +0100 (CET)
From: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
X-Sender: grimsy@calypso.saturn
To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: installation problem.
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980225215717.970B-100000@calypso.saturn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1454
Lines: 39

Hello, sorry that I'm asking.. don't know if this is a support mailing
list.
I have been trying to install linux on my indy today. First I tried to use
the ext2 partition, /dev/sdb1, with no success. THe kernel says:

sdb : sector size 0 reperted, assuming 512.
SCSI device sdb: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 1  [0 MB] [0.0 GB]

I did mke2fs as the documentation told me and that one succeded. How do I
setup the partittion table?
Well. I tested NFS instead and that worked atleast better. I could mount
root filesystem over nfs. But here is some strange errors I get:

VFS: Mounted root(nfs filesystem).
Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00010005, epc ==
8804d248, ra == 8804d514
Warning: bad magic number for tty struct (04:00) in release_dev

When I press enter, I get this:

Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 00000000, epc ==
880c8730, ra == 880c8700
Aiee, killing interrupt handler

And after that is the computer (ofcourse) absolutely dead.

I'm using kernel 2.1.55 (from linux.sgi.com). Are there any newer versions
of the kernel (precompiled)? Do you recommend me to download the
crosscompile package and compile 2.1.88? Or, can't someone send me a
better kernel, or tell me where to get it (support for IRIX file system
doesn't matter)?

Best regards,
Ulf Carlsson.

-----------------------------------------
-     grimsy - http://grimsy.ml.org     -
-----------------------------------------


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Wed Feb 25 13:32:22 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id NAA489558 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:32:21 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA16860 for linux-list; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:31:31 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA16849 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:31:29 -0800
Received: from lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (lager.engsoc.carleton.ca [134.117.69.26]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id NAA07241
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:31:23 -0800
	env-from (adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca)
Received: from localhost (adevries@localhost)
	by lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id QAA02754;
	Wed, 25 Feb 1998 16:31:18 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: lager.engsoc.carleton.ca: adevries owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 16:31:18 -0500 (EST)
From: Alex deVries <adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca>
To: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980225215717.970B-100000@calypso.saturn>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980225162025.28713B-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 711
Lines: 22


On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, Ulf Carlsson wrote:
> 
> Hello, sorry that I'm asking.. don't know if this is a support mailing
> list.
> I have been trying to install linux on my indy today. First I tried to use
> the ext2 partition, /dev/sdb1, with no success. THe kernel says:
> 
> sdb : sector size 0 reperted, assuming 512.
> SCSI device sdb: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 1  [0 MB] [0.0 GB]

Hm.  The 0 MB is what's worrisome, since the kernel doesn't know what kind
of disk you have.  Can you partition and format that disk properly under
Irix?

I'd certainly suggest you use a different kernel.  Uh, I think there's a
.82 kernel kicking around on ftp.linux.sgi.com.  If not, I'll make sure
there is.

- Alex



From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Wed Feb 25 13:50:33 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id NAA498641 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:50:32 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA24220 for linux-list; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:50:01 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA24211 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:49:59 -0800
Received: from seaside2.varberg.se (mail.varberg.se [193.13.151.101]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id NAA13684
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:49:58 -0800
	env-from (grimsy@seaside.se)
Received: from calypso.saturn (grimsy@dialup120-4-47.swipnet.se [130.244.120.239]) by seaside2.varberg.se (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id VAA12720; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 21:55:23 GMT
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 22:51:24 +0100 (CET)
From: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
X-Sender: grimsy@calypso.saturn
To: Alex deVries <adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca>
cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980225162025.28713B-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980225224349.1894A-100000@calypso.saturn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1321
Lines: 34

On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, Alex deVries wrote:

> > sdb : sector size 0 reperted, assuming 512.
> > SCSI device sdb: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 1  [0 MB] [0.0 GB]
> 
> Hm.  The 0 MB is what's worrisome, since the kernel doesn't know what kind
> of disk you have.  Can you partition and format that disk properly under
> Irix?

Hmm.. I have dropped the harddrive in the floor once :)

Well, I get the same error message from the kernel with sda. (those lines
are identical.. the sda error message is just above the sdb's).

Can't you please tell me how to partition and format a disk in irix? I
have no real experience of irix, got this indy last week. But I
have ofcourse been using linux for a long time :) 

I could use mke2fs from irix, no errer messages at all. That proves at
least that the harddrive atleast is alive and kicking. 

> I'd certainly suggest you use a different kernel.  Uh, I think there's a
> .82 kernel kicking around on ftp.linux.sgi.com.  If not, I'll make sure
> there is.

I think I'll try the linux-magnum thing. Do you know what this is? I can't
find any information about it, but it seems to be the latest version.

Maybe this new version solves all my problems.

-----------------------------------------
-     grimsy - http://grimsy.ml.org     -
-----------------------------------------


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Wed Feb 25 13:54:43 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id NAA498499 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:54:43 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA25946 for linux-list; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:54:19 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA25925 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:54:17 -0800
Received: from godzilla.taec.com (godzilla.taec.com [204.162.152.130]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via SMTP id NAA15017
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:54:16 -0800
	env-from (sasahm@taec.toshiba.com)
Received: from mailint.taec.com by godzilla.taec.com
          via smtpd (for SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) with SMTP; 25 Feb 1998 21:54:16 UT
Received: from oita (oita.taec.com [198.232.207.41])
	by sol-x86-1.taec.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA28430
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:54:16 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199802252154.NAA28430@sol-x86-1.taec.com>
To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 Feb 1998 16:31:18 -0500 (EST)"
References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980225162025.28713B-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.68 on Emacs 19.28.1 / Mule 2.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 13:54:16 -0800
From: Masashi Sasahara/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOns4NkA1O0obKEI=?=  <sasahm@taec.toshiba.com>
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 496
Lines: 13

> I'd certainly suggest you use a different kernel.  Uh, I think there's a
> .82 kernel kicking around on ftp.linux.sgi.com.  If not, I'll make sure
> there is.

  I'm using pre-compiled .72 kernel in
ftp://ftp.linux.sgi.com/pub/test, which is working fine on my
Irix box. However I couldn't find .82.

  BTW, How can I get the kernel source for Linux/SGI? Do I need
to get from CVS tree?  I tried to compile the source .72 but, at
least, include/asm-mips is not synchronized.

-Masashi Sasahara

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Wed Feb 25 14:14:58 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id OAA498124 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:14:58 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA03103 for linux-list; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:13:32 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA03097 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:13:30 -0800
Received: from lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (lager.engsoc.carleton.ca [134.117.69.26]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id OAA21854
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:13:29 -0800
	env-from (adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca)
Received: from localhost (adevries@localhost)
	by lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id RAA04588;
	Wed, 25 Feb 1998 17:13:29 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: lager.engsoc.carleton.ca: adevries owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 17:13:29 -0500 (EST)
From: Alex deVries <adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca>
To: Masashi Sasahara/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOns4NkA1O0obKEI=?= <sasahm@taec.toshiba.com>
cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <199802252154.NAA28430@sol-x86-1.taec.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980225171236.28713C-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 719
Lines: 20


On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, Masashi Sasahara/[ISO-2022-JP] $B:{86@5;J(B wrote:
> > I'd certainly suggest you use a different kernel.  Uh, I think there's a
> > .82 kernel kicking around on ftp.linux.sgi.com.  If not, I'll make sure
> > there is.
>   I'm using pre-compiled .72 kernel in
> ftp://ftp.linux.sgi.com/pub/test, which is working fine on my
> Irix box. However I couldn't find .82.

Aiyee.  I meant 72, not 82.  I was working on upversioning it to 82 at one
point but never finished.

>   BTW, How can I get the kernel source for Linux/SGI? Do I need
> to get from CVS tree?  I tried to compile the source .72 but, at
> least, include/asm-mips is not synchronized.

Yup, you need to get it from the CVS.

- Alex


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Wed Feb 25 14:25:26 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id OAA500005 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:25:26 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA06632 for linux-list; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:24:02 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA06625 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:24:00 -0800
Received: from netscape.com (h-205-217-237-47.netscape.com [205.217.237.47]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id OAA24831
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:24:00 -0800
	env-from (shaver@netscape.com)
Received: from dredd.mcom.com (dredd.mcom.com [205.217.237.54])
	by netscape.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA26556
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:23:58 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netscape.com ([208.12.32.37]) by dredd.mcom.com
          (Netscape Messaging Server 3.5)  with ESMTP id AAA3A43;
          Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:23:58 -0800
Message-ID: <34F499FE.A4D60224@netscape.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:23:58 -0800
From: Mike Shaver <shaver@netscape.com>
Organization: Package Reflectors
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.31 i686)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: sasahm@taec.toshiba.com, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
References: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980225162025.28713B-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca> <199802252154.NAA28430@sol-x86-1.taec.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 350
Lines: 12

Masashi Sasahara/$B:{86@5;J(B wrote:
>   BTW, How can I get the kernel source for Linux/SGI? Do I need
> to get from CVS tree?  I tried to compile the source .72 but, at
> least, include/asm-mips is not synchronized.

I've done an export of the current tree to
ftp://ftp.linux.sgi.com/pub/test/kernel-980225.tar.gz .

Mike

-- 
954380.35 933158.02

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Wed Feb 25 14:52:26 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id OAA499711 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:52:26 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA18214 for linux-list; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:51:03 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA18198 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:51:00 -0800
Received: from seaside2.varberg.se (mail.varberg.se [193.13.151.101]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id OAA03335
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:50:59 -0800
	env-from (grimsy@seaside.se)
Received: from calypso.saturn (grimsy@dialup120-4-47.swipnet.se [130.244.120.239]) by seaside2.varberg.se (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA13172; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 22:56:36 GMT
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 23:52:47 +0100 (CET)
From: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
X-Sender: grimsy@calypso.saturn
To: Mike Shaver <shaver@netscape.com>
cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <34F499FE.A4D60224@netscape.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980225235118.1970A-100000@calypso.saturn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 395
Lines: 12

On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, Mike Shaver wrote:

> I've done an export of the current tree to
> ftp://ftp.linux.sgi.com/pub/test/kernel-980225.tar.gz .

Great, but can't someone put a precompiled _new_ kernel somewhere on
ftp.linux.sgi.com since everyone can't crosscompile?

-----------------------------------------
-     grimsy - http://grimsy.ml.org     -
-----------------------------------------


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Wed Feb 25 14:58:23 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id OAA500159 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:58:23 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA20594 for linux-list; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:57:43 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA20587 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:57:41 -0800
Received: from netscape.com (h-205-217-237-47.netscape.com [205.217.237.47]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id OAA05415
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:57:41 -0800
	env-from (shaver@netscape.com)
Received: from dredd.mcom.com (dredd.mcom.com [205.217.237.54])
	by netscape.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id OAA00233
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:57:39 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netscape.com ([208.12.32.37]) by dredd.mcom.com
          (Netscape Messaging Server 3.5)  with ESMTP id AAA5E9F;
          Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:57:38 -0800
Message-ID: <34F4A1E2.4E6E6A28@netscape.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 14:57:38 -0800
From: Mike Shaver <shaver@netscape.com>
Organization: Package Reflectors
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.31 i686)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
CC: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980225235118.1970A-100000@calypso.saturn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 385
Lines: 12

Ulf Carlsson wrote:
> Great, but can't someone put a precompiled _new_ kernel somewhere on
> ftp.linux.sgi.com since everyone can't crosscompile?

My xcompiler setup got removed to make space for the sanitized
communicator source free, but I'll clear that out and reinstall it later
today.  In the meantime, could someone else build that tarball?  Alex?

Mike

-- 
957293.37 935819.57

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Wed Feb 25 15:19:09 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id PAA499458 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 15:19:09 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA28991 for linux-list; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 15:18:05 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA28978 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 15:18:03 -0800
Received: from godzilla.taec.com (godzilla.taec.com [204.162.152.130]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via SMTP id PAA12360
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 15:18:02 -0800
	env-from (sasahm@taec.toshiba.com)
Received: from mailint.taec.com by godzilla.taec.com
          via smtpd (for SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) with SMTP; 25 Feb 1998 23:18:02 UT
Received: from oita (oita.taec.com [198.232.207.41])
	by sol-x86-1.taec.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id PAA01436
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 15:18:02 -0800 (PST)
Message-Id: <199802252318.PAA01436@sol-x86-1.taec.com>
To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: Your message of "Wed, 25 Feb 1998 23:52:47 +0100 (CET)"
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980225235118.1970A-100000@calypso.saturn>
X-Mailer: Mew version 1.68 on Emacs 19.28.1 / Mule 2.3
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 15:18:02 -0800
From: Masashi Sasahara/=?ISO-2022-JP?B?GyRCOns4NkA1O0obKEI=?=  <sasahm@taec.toshiba.com>
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 409
Lines: 15

> > I've done an export of the current tree to
> > ftp://ftp.linux.sgi.com/pub/test/kernel-980225.tar.gz .

  Great, Great! Thank you very muxh, Mike. I really appreciate
your quick response.


> Great, but can't someone put a precompiled _new_ kernel somewhere on
> ftp.linux.sgi.com since everyone can't crosscompile?

  Isn't it the one I got? (I mean, vmlinux-indy-2.1.72.tar.gz)

Tks,

-Masashi Sasahara

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Wed Feb 25 15:19:53 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id PAA495907 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 15:19:53 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA29610 for linux-list; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 15:19:26 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA29560 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 15:19:21 -0800
Received: from lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (lager.engsoc.carleton.ca [134.117.69.26]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id PAA12722
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 15:19:17 -0800
	env-from (adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca)
Received: from localhost (adevries@localhost)
	by lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id SAA08467;
	Wed, 25 Feb 1998 18:19:17 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: lager.engsoc.carleton.ca: adevries owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 18:19:17 -0500 (EST)
From: Alex deVries <adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca>
To: Mike Shaver <shaver@netscape.com>
cc: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <34F4A1E2.4E6E6A28@netscape.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980225181711.28713D-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 773
Lines: 23


On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, Mike Shaver wrote:
> Ulf Carlsson wrote:
> > Great, but can't someone put a precompiled _new_ kernel somewhere on
> > ftp.linux.sgi.com since everyone can't crosscompile?
> My xcompiler setup got removed to make space for the sanitized
> communicator source free, but I'll clear that out and reinstall it later
> today.  In the meantime, could someone else build that tarball?  Alex?

I'm not going to get into the xcompiler unless I have to, and I don't.

But, there are .72 binaries in:
ftp://ftp.linux.sgi.com/pub/test/

There's two different onces; vmlinux-indy-2.1.72.tar.gz for machines with
an scache; vmlinux-indy-noL2-2.1.72.tar.gz for those without L2.

Uh, I *think* they work.  If they don't let me know and I'll compile one.  

- alex




From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Wed Feb 25 19:42:16 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id TAA539845 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 19:42:16 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id TAA25535 for linux-list; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 19:41:33 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id TAA25524 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 19:41:31 -0800
Received: from lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (lager.engsoc.carleton.ca [134.117.69.26]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id TAA24377
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Wed, 25 Feb 1998 19:41:30 -0800
	env-from (adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca)
Received: from localhost (adevries@localhost)
	by lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id WAA19268;
	Wed, 25 Feb 1998 22:41:34 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: lager.engsoc.carleton.ca: adevries owned process doing -bs
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 22:41:34 -0500 (EST)
From: Alex deVries <adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca>
To: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980225224349.1894A-100000@calypso.saturn>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980225223801.13530B-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1083
Lines: 30


On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, Ulf Carlsson wrote:
> On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, Alex deVries wrote:
> > > sdb : sector size 0 reperted, assuming 512.
> > > SCSI device sdb: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 1  [0 MB] [0.0 GB]
> > Hm.  The 0 MB is what's worrisome, since the kernel doesn't know what kind
> > of disk you have.  Can you partition and format that disk properly under
> > Irix?
> 
> Hmm.. I have dropped the harddrive in the floor once :)

Who hasn't? :)

> Well, I get the same error message from the kernel with sda. (those lines
> are identical.. the sda error message is just above the sdb's).

Yup.  It sounds like it's a SCSI driver problem.  Are you getting the
error message now with .72?

> Can't you please tell me how to partition and format a disk in irix? I
> have no real experience of irix, got this indy last week. But I
> have ofcourse been using linux for a long time :) 

You need to use fx, or that cutesy graphical tool that's on the menus.

NB: the latest release on ftp.linux.sgi.com is 2.1.72, not 2.1.82 as I'd
mentioned earlier.  Too many numbers...

- Alex


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 26 00:30:56 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id AAA604882 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 00:30:55 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id AAA06935 for linux-list; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 00:30:22 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id AAA06919 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 00:30:18 -0800
Received: from netscape.com (h-205-217-237-47.netscape.com [205.217.237.47]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id AAA18430
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 00:30:17 -0800
	env-from (shaver@netscape.com)
Received: from dredd.mcom.com (dredd.mcom.com [205.217.237.54])
	by netscape.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) with ESMTP id AAA26593
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 00:30:15 -0800 (PST)
Received: from netscape.com ([205.217.243.3]) by dredd.mcom.com
          (Netscape Messaging Server 3.5)  with ESMTP id AAA284C;
          Thu, 26 Feb 1998 00:30:13 -0800
Message-ID: <34F50934.7C766D2C@netscape.com>
Date: Wed, 25 Feb 1998 22:18:28 -0800
From: Mike Shaver <shaver@netscape.com>
Organization: Package Reflectors
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.02 [en] (X11; U; IRIX 6.2 IP22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
CC: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980226085920.2193D-100000@calypso.saturn>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 751
Lines: 19

Ulf Carlsson wrote:
> It's also very strange that the kernel doesn't detect my scsi harddrives
> correctly (I have reported these error messages earlier). I tested fx, and
> fx detected them correctly. I get the same error with my orginal sgi
> harddrive which obviously works, since irix doesn't have any problems with
> it.

Oh...is that drive SCSI id 7?  I had problems with one of my drives
(which was happy under IRIX) until I changed the id to something other
than 7.
 
> I'll take a look in the kernel source and try to figure out what's causing
> that kernel paging error.

You want to run mips-linux-objdump to get a function+offset (or, if that
kernel was compiled -g, line number info) for the fault, and then we can
try to debug it.

Mike

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 26 00:07:59 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id AAA607287 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 00:07:59 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id AAA01895 for linux-list; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 00:07:20 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id AAA01884 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 00:07:18 -0800
Received: from seaside2.varberg.se (mail.varberg.se [193.13.151.101]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id AAA15054
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 00:07:17 -0800
	env-from (grimsy@seaside.se)
Received: from calypso.saturn (grimsy@dialup118-3-28.swipnet.se [130.244.118.156]) by seaside2.varberg.se (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id IAA15731 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 08:13:07 GMT
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 09:09:06 +0100 (CET)
From: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
X-Sender: grimsy@calypso.saturn
To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980226085920.2193D-100000@calypso.saturn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1136
Lines: 30

> But, there are .72 binaries in:
> ftp://ftp.linux.sgi.com/pub/test/

Sorry it's my fault (my big fool). Assumed all the .tar.gz files were
sources, forgot checking the sizes.

Well, the .72 binary didn't boot at all. I got "black screen". But .67
gets atleast so far that it mounts my root filesystem (over nfs). But
directly after that I recieve these errors (same as under .55, but this
kernel prints the message more than one time):

Unable to handle kernel paging request at virtual address 000013f0, epc ==
8803ff14, ra == 88040680
Aiee, killing interrupt handler

That message is printed out about ten times with different
values for epc and ra and virtual address.
Do you have any idea what's causing this mess?

It's also very strange that the kernel doesn't detect my scsi harddrives
correctly (I have reported these error messages earlier). I tested fx, and
fx detected them correctly. I get the same error with my orginal sgi
harddrive which obviously works, since irix doesn't have any problems with
it.

I'll take a look in the kernel source and try to figure out what's causing
that kernel paging error.

/Ulf Carlsson


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 26 00:59:55 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id AAA605469 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 00:59:55 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id AAA09463 for linux-list; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 00:59:19 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id AAA09452 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 00:59:18 -0800
Received: from seaside2.varberg.se (mail.varberg.se [193.13.151.101]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id AAA23069
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 00:59:17 -0800
	env-from (grimsy@seaside.se)
Received: from calypso.saturn (grimsy@dialup148-2-21.swipnet.se [130.244.148.85]) by seaside2.varberg.se (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id JAA16575; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 09:04:59 GMT
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 10:00:54 +0100 (CET)
From: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
X-Sender: grimsy@calypso.saturn
To: Mike Shaver <shaver@netscape.com>
cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <34F50934.7C766D2C@netscape.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980226095100.2735A-100000@calypso.saturn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1093
Lines: 30

On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, Mike Shaver wrote:

> Ulf Carlsson wrote:
> > It's also very strange that the kernel doesn't detect my scsi harddrives
> > correctly (I have reported these error messages earlier). I tested fx, and
> > fx detected them correctly. I get the same error with my orginal sgi
> > harddrive which obviously works, since irix doesn't have any problems with
> > it.
> 
> Oh...is that drive SCSI id 7?  I had problems with one of my drives
> (which was happy under IRIX) until I changed the id to something other
> than 7.

No, one drive is at id 4 and one at id 6.

Have I forgot to do something? I used the Disk Manager from the menu to
partition my scsi drive. Then I used mke2fs /dev/dsk/dks0d6s7. Is that the
corrected procedure?

> > I'll take a look in the kernel source and try to figure out what's causing
> > that kernel paging error.
> 
> You want to run mips-linux-objdump to get a function+offset (or, if that
> kernel was compiled -g, line number info) for the fault, and then we can
> try to debug it.

Is mips-linux-objdump in the binutils package?

/Ulf Carlsson


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 26 06:10:50 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id GAA346577 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 06:10:50 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id GAA06636 for linux-list; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 06:10:04 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id GAA06631 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 06:10:02 -0800
Received: from seaside2.varberg.se (mail.varberg.se [193.13.151.101]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id GAA10213
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 06:10:01 -0800
	env-from (grimsy@seaside.se)
Received: from calypso.saturn (grimsy@dialup179-2-3.swipnet.se [130.244.179.67]) by seaside2.varberg.se (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA18370 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 10:45:29 GMT
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 11:41:26 +0100 (CET)
From: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
X-Sender: grimsy@calypso.saturn
To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980226095100.2735A-100000@calypso.saturn>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980226112524.2914B-100000@calypso.saturn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 799
Lines: 29

Hello again.

I'm getting pretty tired. No progress at all. Is my configuration special
in any way?

System: IP22
Processor: 100 Mhz R4000, with FPU
Primary I-cache size: 8 kbytes
Primary d-cache size: 8 kbytes
Secondary cache size: 1024 Kbytes
Memory size: 32 Mbytes
Graphics: Indy 8-bit
SCSI Disk: scsi(0)disk(4)
SCSI Disk: scsi(0)disk(6)

Are not all indys almost identical? It's very strange IMO that .72 hangs
before it prints anything on the screen. I think I've tested almost
everything by now.

Those harddrive problems don't matter right now. It's possible to run over
nfs so.. it's the kernel paging error which is the problem.

I am not blaming you SGI/Linux developers for creating a bad system in any
way. It would have been really nice if it worked :)

What will I do?

/Ulf Carlsson


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 26 05:55:50 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id FAA634971 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 05:55:50 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id FAA03189 for linux-list; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 05:55:05 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id FAA03178 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 05:55:03 -0800
Received: from seaside2.varberg.se (mail.varberg.se [193.13.151.101]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id FAA04688
	for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 05:55:01 -0800
	env-from (grimsy@seaside.se)
Received: from calypso.saturn (grimsy@dialup147-1-1.swipnet.se [130.244.147.1]) by seaside2.varberg.se (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id LAA18879 for <linux@engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 11:11:24 GMT
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 12:07:20 +0100 (CET)
From: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
X-Sender: grimsy@calypso.saturn
To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980226120308.3903B-100000@calypso.saturn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1089
Lines: 33

Hello again.

I'm getting pretty tired. No progress at all. Is my configuration special
in any way?

System: IP22
Processor: 100 Mhz R4000, with FPU
Primary I-cache size: 8 kbytes
Primary d-cache size: 8 kbytes
Secondary cache size: 1024 Kbytes
Memory size: 32 Mbytes
Graphics: Indy 8-bit
SCSI Disk: scsi(0)disk(4)
SCSI Disk: scsi(0)disk(6)

Are not all indys almost identical? It's very strange IMO that .72 hangs
before it prints anything on the screen. I think I've tested almost
everything by now.

Those harddrive problems don't matter right now. It's possible to run over
nfs so.. it's the kernel paging error which is the problem. I think this
error might be caused by my pc, because I don't get that error when the
network is down or the pc is shut down, but I can't boot when the pc is
down because I'm using nfs root system. Maybe the pc sends out signals on
the network which sgi linux can't handle (just a thought).

I am not blaming you SGI/Linux developers for creating a bad system in any
way. It would have been really nice if it worked :)

What will I do?

/Ulf Carlsson


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 26 07:38:43 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id HAA631139 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 07:38:43 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id HAA23591 for linux-list; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 07:38:09 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id HAA23586 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 07:38:08 -0800
Received: from seaside2.varberg.se (mail.varberg.se [193.13.151.101]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id HAA02465
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 07:38:06 -0800
	env-from (grimsy@seaside.se)
Received: from calypso.saturn (grimsy@dialup162-4-59.swipnet.se [130.244.162.251]) by seaside2.varberg.se (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id PAA23670; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 15:44:04 GMT
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 16:39:54 +0100 (CET)
From: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
X-Sender: grimsy@calypso.saturn
To: Mike Shaver <shaver@netscape.com>
cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <34F50934.7C766D2C@netscape.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980226163817.4504B-100000@calypso.saturn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 184
Lines: 9

On Wed, 25 Feb 1998, Mike Shaver wrote:

> Oh...is that drive SCSI id 7?

They were 4 (irix) and 6 (linux) before, but I've changed them to 2 and
5 now. No difference.

/Ulf Carlsson


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 26 09:35:16 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id JAA561607 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 09:35:16 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id JAA24418 for linux-list; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 09:34:10 -0800
Received: from fir.engr.sgi.com (fir.engr.sgi.com [150.166.49.183]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id JAA24371; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 09:34:05 -0800
Received: (from wje@localhost) by fir.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id JAA25332; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 09:34:05 -0800
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 09:34:05 -0800
Message-Id: <199802261734.JAA25332@fir.engr.sgi.com>
From: "William J. Earl" <wje@fir.engr.sgi.com>
To: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980226120308.3903B-100000@calypso.saturn>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980226120308.3903B-100000@calypso.saturn>
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1699
Lines: 47

Ulf Carlsson writes:
 > Hello again.
 > 
 > I'm getting pretty tired. No progress at all. Is my configuration special
 > in any way?
 > 
 > System: IP22
 > Processor: 100 Mhz R4000, with FPU
 > Primary I-cache size: 8 kbytes
 > Primary d-cache size: 8 kbytes
 > Secondary cache size: 1024 Kbytes
 > Memory size: 32 Mbytes
 > Graphics: Indy 8-bit
 > SCSI Disk: scsi(0)disk(4)
 > SCSI Disk: scsi(0)disk(6)
 > 
 > Are not all indys almost identical? It's very strange IMO that .72 hangs
 > before it prints anything on the screen. I think I've tested almost
 > everything by now.
...

     No, there are many different CPU types for the Indy, in order
of appearance:

	R4000PC, 100 MHZ
	R4000SC, 100 MHZ
	R4600PC, 100 and 133 MHZ
	R4400SC, 150 and 200 MHZ
	R4600SC, 133 MHZ
	R5000PC, 150 and 180 MHZ
	R5000SC, 180 MHZ

In the above, "PC" means that there is no secondary cache and "SC"
means that there is.  The R4000 and R4400 are functionally very similar, except
for cache size.  The R4600 and R5000 are also similar, but with
a very different cache organization from the R4000 and R4400.  Various
revision of the processors (and more than one revision was shipped
for each processor) have different errata, so the kernel must work around
various processor errata according to the processor type and revision.
As I understand it, the currently checked-in source must be recompiled
to provide R4600/R5000 PC and SC versions for Indy, and those versions
may not be fully tested on all R4000 and R4400 revisions.  In the not
distant future, a single kernel will likely support all the processors,
as does the IRIX kernel, but that is more work than just selecting
the processor type at compile time.



From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 26 13:48:02 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id NAA638643 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 13:48:02 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA25551 for linux-list; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 13:46:07 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA25531 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 13:46:05 -0800
Received: from rachael.franken.de (rachael.franken.de [193.175.24.38]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id NAA08382
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 13:46:04 -0800
	env-from (rachael.franken.de!hub-fue!alpha.franken.de!tsbogend)
Received: from hub-fue by rachael.franken.de
	via rmail with uucp
	id <m0y8B7x-0027cnC@rachael.franken.de>
	for cthulhu.engr.sgi.com!linux; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 22:46:01 +0100 (MET)
	(Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #4 built DST-Sep-8)
Received: by hub-fue.franken.de (Smail3.1.29.1 #35)
	id m0y8B7l-002OuHC; Thu, 26 Feb 98 22:45 MET
Received: (from tsbogend@localhost)
	by alpha.franken.de (8.8.7/8.8.5) id WAA01653;
	Thu, 26 Feb 1998 22:42:54 +0100
Message-ID: <19980226224253.20580@alpha.franken.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 22:42:53 +0100
From: Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@alpha.franken.de>
To: "William J. Earl" <wje@fir.engr.sgi.com>
Cc: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980226120308.3903B-100000@calypso.saturn> <199802261734.JAA25332@fir.engr.sgi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.85
In-Reply-To: <199802261734.JAA25332@fir.engr.sgi.com>; from William J. Earl on Thu, Feb 26, 1998 at 09:34:05AM -0800
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 829
Lines: 18

> As I understand it, the currently checked-in source must be recompiled
> to provide R4600/R5000 PC and SC versions for Indy, and those versions
> may not be fully tested on all R4000 and R4400 revisions.  In the not
> distant future, a single kernel will likely support all the processors,
> as does the IRIX kernel, but that is more work than just selecting
> the processor type at compile time.

the R4000PC part of the .72 current works at least on my Magnum clone. But
I've got an error report, that my kernel doesn't work on a Magnum with a
R4000SC. So I guess it's really related to the processor handling in the
kernel.

Thomas.

-- 
See, you not only have to be a good coder to create a system like Linux,
you have to be a sneaky bastard too ;-)
                   [Linus Torvalds in <4rikft$7g5@linux.cs.Helsinki.FI>]

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 26 13:57:21 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id NAA649816 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 13:57:21 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA00189 for linux-list; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 13:56:42 -0800
Received: from soyuz.wellington.sgi.com (soyuz.wellington.sgi.com [134.14.64.194]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA00169 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 13:56:38 -0800
Received: from wellington.sgi.com by soyuz.wellington.sgi.com via ESMTP (950413.SGI.8.6.12/940406.SGI)
	 id KAA28856; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 10:53:34 +1300
Message-ID: <34F5E45E.3C8881C0@wellington.sgi.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 10:53:34 +1300
From: Alistair Lambie <alambie@wellington.sgi.com>
X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.04C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5-ALPHA-1274392335 IP22)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "William J. Earl" <wje@fir.engr.sgi.com>
CC: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980226120308.3903B-100000@calypso.saturn> <199802261734.JAA25332@fir.engr.sgi.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 2244
Lines: 59

William J. Earl wrote:
> 
> Ulf Carlsson writes:
>  > Hello again.
>  >
>  > I'm getting pretty tired. No progress at all. Is my configuration special
>  > in any way?
>  >
>  > System: IP22
>  > Processor: 100 Mhz R4000, with FPU
>  > Primary I-cache size: 8 kbytes
>  > Primary d-cache size: 8 kbytes
>  > Secondary cache size: 1024 Kbytes
>  > Memory size: 32 Mbytes
>  > Graphics: Indy 8-bit
>  > SCSI Disk: scsi(0)disk(4)
>  > SCSI Disk: scsi(0)disk(6)
>  >
>  > Are not all indys almost identical? It's very strange IMO that .72 hangs
>  > before it prints anything on the screen. I think I've tested almost
>  > everything by now.
> ...
> 

Wouldn't be a pre newport graphics machine would it?  Has this been tried?  Just
a thought.

Cheers, Alistair

>      No, there are many different CPU types for the Indy, in order
> of appearance:
> 
>         R4000PC, 100 MHZ
>         R4000SC, 100 MHZ
>         R4600PC, 100 and 133 MHZ
>         R4400SC, 150 and 200 MHZ
>         R4600SC, 133 MHZ
>         R5000PC, 150 and 180 MHZ
>         R5000SC, 180 MHZ
> 
> In the above, "PC" means that there is no secondary cache and "SC"
> means that there is.  The R4000 and R4400 are functionally very similar, except
> for cache size.  The R4600 and R5000 are also similar, but with
> a very different cache organization from the R4000 and R4400.  Various
> revision of the processors (and more than one revision was shipped
> for each processor) have different errata, so the kernel must work around
> various processor errata according to the processor type and revision.
> As I understand it, the currently checked-in source must be recompiled
> to provide R4600/R5000 PC and SC versions for Indy, and those versions
> may not be fully tested on all R4000 and R4400 revisions.  In the not
> distant future, a single kernel will likely support all the processors,
> as does the IRIX kernel, but that is more work than just selecting
> the processor type at compile time.

-- 
Alistair Lambie                         alambie@wellington.sgi.com
Silicon Graphics New Zealand                SGI Voicemail: 2431455
Level 5, Cigna House,                           Ph: +64-4-494 6325
40 Mercer St, Wellington, NZ                   Fax: +64-4-494 6321

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 26 14:25:48 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id OAA555912 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 14:25:47 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA09863 for linux-list; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 14:24:40 -0800
Received: from fir.engr.sgi.com (fir.engr.sgi.com [150.166.49.183]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA09852; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 14:24:38 -0800
Received: (from wje@localhost) by fir.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA26260; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 14:24:38 -0800
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 14:24:38 -0800
Message-Id: <199802262224.OAA26260@fir.engr.sgi.com>
From: "William J. Earl" <wje@fir.engr.sgi.com>
To: Alistair Lambie <alambie@wellington.sgi.com>
Cc: "William J. Earl" <wje@fir.engr.sgi.com>, Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>,
        linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <34F5E45E.3C8881C0@wellington.sgi.com>
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980226120308.3903B-100000@calypso.saturn>
	<199802261734.JAA25332@fir.engr.sgi.com>
	<34F5E45E.3C8881C0@wellington.sgi.com>
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 955
Lines: 32

Alistair Lambie writes:
 > William J. Earl wrote:
 > > 
 > > Ulf Carlsson writes:
 > >  > Hello again.
 > >  >
 > >  > I'm getting pretty tired. No progress at all. Is my configuration special
 > >  > in any way?
 > >  >
 > >  > System: IP22
 > >  > Processor: 100 Mhz R4000, with FPU
 > >  > Primary I-cache size: 8 kbytes
 > >  > Primary d-cache size: 8 kbytes
 > >  > Secondary cache size: 1024 Kbytes
 > >  > Memory size: 32 Mbytes
 > >  > Graphics: Indy 8-bit
 > >  > SCSI Disk: scsi(0)disk(4)
 > >  > SCSI Disk: scsi(0)disk(6)
 > >  >
 > >  > Are not all indys almost identical? It's very strange IMO that .72 hangs
 > >  > before it prints anything on the screen. I think I've tested almost
 > >  > everything by now.
 > > ...
 > > 
 > 
 > Wouldn't be a pre newport graphics machine would it?  Has this been tried?  Just
 > a thought.
...

     No, "Graphics: Indy 8-bit" is Newport.  Is this really the "SC" kernel for Indy,
not the "PC" kernel?


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 26 14:58:28 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id OAA642297 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 14:58:28 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA21227 for linux-list; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 14:56:31 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA21214 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 14:56:29 -0800
Received: from informatik.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.4.1]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id OAA02774
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 14:56:27 -0800
	env-from (ralf@uni-koblenz.de)
From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
Received: from uni-koblenz.de (pmport-29.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.249.29])
	by informatik.uni-koblenz.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA26496
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 23:56:24 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from ralf@localhost)
	by uni-koblenz.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA04230;
	Thu, 26 Feb 1998 23:53:00 +0100
Message-ID: <19980226235300.23817@uni-koblenz.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 23:53:00 +0100
To: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980226095100.2735A-100000@calypso.saturn> <Pine.LNX.3.96.980226112524.2914B-100000@calypso.saturn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.85e
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980226112524.2914B-100000@calypso.saturn>; from Ulf Carlsson on Thu, Feb 26, 1998 at 11:41:26AM +0100
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 534
Lines: 20

On Thu, Feb 26, 1998 at 11:41:26AM +0100, Ulf Carlsson wrote:

> Hello again.
> 
> I'm getting pretty tired. No progress at all. Is my configuration special
> in any way?
> 
> System: IP22
> Processor: 100 Mhz R4000, with FPU
> Primary I-cache size: 8 kbytes
> Primary d-cache size: 8 kbytes
> Secondary cache size: 1024 Kbytes

So this must be a R4000SC CPU.  The CPU support code for it is buggy, that's
why it it's working.

Fixes probably coming next week; as think are looking I'll have a hell lot
of time again by then.

  Ralf

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Thu Feb 26 14:59:44 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id OAA657401 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 14:59:44 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA22294 for linux-list; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 14:59:21 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA22286; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 14:59:19 -0800
Received: from informatik.uni-koblenz.de ([141.26.4.1]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id OAA03623; Thu, 26 Feb 1998 14:59:17 -0800
	env-from (ralf@uni-koblenz.de)
From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
Received: from uni-koblenz.de (pmport-29.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.249.29])
	by informatik.uni-koblenz.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA26645;
	Thu, 26 Feb 1998 23:59:15 +0100 (MET)
Received: (from ralf@localhost)
	by uni-koblenz.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id XAA04237;
	Thu, 26 Feb 1998 23:56:17 +0100
Message-ID: <19980226235617.55802@uni-koblenz.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Feb 1998 23:56:17 +0100
To: "William J. Earl" <wje@fir.engr.sgi.com>
Cc: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980226120308.3903B-100000@calypso.saturn> <199802261734.JAA25332@fir.engr.sgi.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.85e
In-Reply-To: <199802261734.JAA25332@fir.engr.sgi.com>; from William J. Earl on Thu, Feb 26, 1998 at 09:34:05AM -0800
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1192
Lines: 24

On Thu, Feb 26, 1998 at 09:34:05AM -0800, William J. Earl wrote:

> for cache size.  The R4600 and R5000 are also similar, but with
> a very different cache organization from the R4000 and R4400.  Various
> revision of the processors (and more than one revision was shipped
> for each processor) have different errata, so the kernel must work around
> various processor errata according to the processor type and revision.

In case of the R4000 we still have some work to do with respect to the
errata stuff.

> As I understand it, the currently checked-in source must be recompiled
> to provide R4600/R5000 PC and SC versions for Indy, and those versions
> may not be fully tested on all R4000 and R4400 revisions.  In the not
> distant future, a single kernel will likely support all the processors,
> as does the IRIX kernel, but that is more work than just selecting
> the processor type at compile time.

The code in the CVS archive is plain buggy for certain configurations.
Given the number of possible configurations possible everything else but
a single kernel binary would be braindead.  Especially because the price
we have to pay for a single Indy binary isn't that high.

  Ralf

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Fri Feb 27 05:46:38 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id FAA695159 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 05:46:38 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id FAA29911 for linux-list; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 05:46:08 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id FAA29894 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 05:46:06 -0800
Received: from seaside2.varberg.se (mail.varberg.se [193.13.151.101]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id FAA25711
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 05:46:05 -0800
	env-from (grimsy@seaside.se)
Received: from calypso.saturn (grimsy@dialup174-3-17.swipnet.se [130.244.174.145]) by seaside2.varberg.se (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA04018; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 13:52:25 GMT
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 14:47:48 +0100 (CET)
From: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
X-Sender: grimsy@calypso.saturn
To: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <19980226235300.23817@uni-koblenz.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980227143143.6574D-100000@calypso.saturn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1000
Lines: 29

On Thu, 26 Feb 1998 ralf@uni-koblenz.de wrote:

> > System: IP22
> > Processor: 100 Mhz R4000, with FPU
> > Primary I-cache size: 8 kbytes
> > Primary d-cache size: 8 kbytes
> > Secondary cache size: 1024 Kbytes
> 
> So this must be a R4000SC CPU.  The CPU support code for it is buggy, that's
> why it it's working.

It's _not_ working. And I would like to know why it isn't working.  (ok, I
understand what you mean, sorry :)  Well, this is not a big problem for me
anyway. The .68 kernel works. The main problem is the one with the
harddrives (detecting them, but with the size of 0Mb, and the kernel can't
read the partition tables), and the one with the kernel paging request it
can't handle. Any ideas? 

> Fixes probably coming next week; as think are looking I'll have a hell lot
> of time again by then.

Great, next week.. (feels like one year).

/Ulf Carlsson.

-----------------------------------------
-     grimsy - http://grimsy.ml.org     -
-----------------------------------------


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Fri Feb 27 05:51:06 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id FAA550312 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 05:51:06 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id FAA00515 for linux-list; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 05:50:43 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id FAA00511; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 05:50:42 -0800
Received: from seaside2.varberg.se (mail.varberg.se [193.13.151.101]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id FAA26586; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 05:50:40 -0800
	env-from (grimsy@seaside.se)
Received: from calypso.saturn (grimsy@dialup174-3-17.swipnet.se [130.244.174.145]) by seaside2.varberg.se (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id NAA04092; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 13:57:01 GMT
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 14:52:25 +0100 (CET)
From: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
X-Sender: grimsy@calypso.saturn
To: Alistair Lambie <alambie@wellington.sgi.com>
cc: "William J. Earl" <wje@fir.engr.sgi.com>, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <34F5E45E.3C8881C0@wellington.sgi.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980227144932.6574F-100000@calypso.saturn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 980
Lines: 30

On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, Alistair Lambie wrote:

> William J. Earl wrote:
> >  > System: IP22
> >  > Processor: 100 Mhz R4000, with FPU
> >  > Primary I-cache size: 8 kbytes
> >  > Primary d-cache size: 8 kbytes
> >  > Secondary cache size: 1024 Kbytes
> >  > Memory size: 32 Mbytes
> >  > Graphics: Indy 8-bit
> >  > SCSI Disk: scsi(0)disk(4)
> >  > SCSI Disk: scsi(0)disk(6)
> >  >
> >  > Are not all indys almost identical? It's very strange IMO that .72 hangs
> >  > before it prints anything on the screen. I think I've tested almost
> >  > everything by now.
> 
> Wouldn't be a pre newport graphics machine would it?  Has this been tried?  Just
> a thought.

Pre newport, what's that? Do you mean that I'm the only one with this
configuration trying to run SGI/Linux, darn... thought this was one of the
most common configurations of the Indy.

/ulf

-----------------------------------------
-     grimsy - http://grimsy.ml.org     -
-----------------------------------------


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Fri Feb 27 15:22:26 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id PAA49057 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:22:26 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA22307 for linux-list; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:20:37 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA22302 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:20:35 -0800
Received: from uni-koblenz.de (praia.bofh.de [195.78.185.18]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id PAA26129
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:20:27 -0800
	env-from (ralf@uni-koblenz.de)
From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
Received: (from ralf@localhost)
	by uni-koblenz.de (8.8.7/8.8.7) id TAA01455;
	Fri, 27 Feb 1998 19:25:54 +0100
Message-ID: <19980227192553.12373@uni-koblenz.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 19:25:53 +0100
To: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
References: <19980226235300.23817@uni-koblenz.de> <Pine.LNX.3.96.980227143143.6574D-100000@calypso.saturn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.85e
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980227143143.6574D-100000@calypso.saturn>; from Ulf Carlsson on Fri, Feb 27, 1998 at 02:47:48PM +0100
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1318
Lines: 37

On Fri, Feb 27, 1998 at 02:47:48PM +0100, Ulf Carlsson wrote:

> > > System: IP22
> > > Processor: 100 Mhz R4000, with FPU
> > > Primary I-cache size: 8 kbytes
> > > Primary d-cache size: 8 kbytes
> > > Secondary cache size: 1024 Kbytes
> > 
> > So this must be a R4000SC CPU.  The CPU support code for it is buggy, that's
> > why it it's working.
> 
> It's _not_ working. And I would like to know why it isn't working.  (ok, I

The exact bug is that one of the cache maintenance routines in
include/asm-mips/r4kcache.h uses there wrong cachop for flushing the
cache.

> understand what you mean, sorry :)  Well, this is not a big problem for me
> anyway. The .68 kernel works. The main problem is the one with the
           
.68 isn't supposed to work.  The memory is laid out such that the buggy
cache routine has a bit less of effect.

> harddrives (detecting them, but with the size of 0Mb, and the kernel can't
> read the partition tables), and the one with the kernel paging request it
> can't handle. Any ideas? 

Should all be the cache effect.

> > Fixes probably coming next week; as think are looking I'll have a hell lot
> > of time again by then.
> 
> Great, next week.. (feels like one year).

Next week starts tonite.  Linux/MIPS industries going back online ...

  Ralf  (Getting coffee and milk ...)

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Fri Feb 27 12:25:39 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id MAA26776 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 12:25:39 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id MAA23845 for linux-list; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 12:24:37 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id MAA22567; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 12:21:27 -0800
Received: from lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (lager.engsoc.carleton.ca [134.117.69.26]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id MAA29821; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 12:21:23 -0800
	env-from (adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca)
Received: from localhost (adevries@localhost)
	by lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id PAA29758;
	Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:20:55 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: lager.engsoc.carleton.ca: adevries owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:20:55 -0500 (EST)
From: Alex deVries <adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca>
To: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
cc: Alistair Lambie <alambie@wellington.sgi.com>,
        "William J. Earl" <wje@fir.engr.sgi.com>, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980227144932.6574F-100000@calypso.saturn>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980227151518.20111B-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1057
Lines: 26


On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, Ulf Carlsson wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, Alistair Lambie wrote:
> > William J. Earl wrote:
> > >  > Are not all indys almost identical? It's very strange IMO that .72 hangs
> > >  > before it prints anything on the screen. I think I've tested almost
> > >  > everything by now.

Ah, I think I know the problem.  There are some problems with the .72 make
depend which screws up the console.  The version that's uploaded may not
have the console compiled in properly.  That should be clear from the
config file that' sin the tar.gz file.

I could quite easily get you a binary that does have it compiled in. If I
don't have it on linus by tomorrow, pester me.

Been there, done that.

I might think about doing the update to .89, but I don't want to try to do
what anybody else is doing, since 10 Alex hours = 1 Ralf hour.  But, my
other projects with GTK and RPM are kind of at a standstill because of
waiting for others to release components and sorting out endless loops of
design logic.  So, maybe I'll take a stab at it.

- Alex


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Fri Feb 27 15:42:20 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id PAA50699 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:42:20 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA00176 for linux-list; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:40:28 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA00155 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:40:26 -0800
Received: from seaside2.varberg.se (mail.varberg.se [193.13.151.101]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id PAA13416
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:40:25 -0800
	env-from (grimsy@seaside.se)
Received: from calypso.saturn (grimsy@dialup162-3-31.swipnet.se [130.244.162.159]) by seaside2.varberg.se (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id XAA11048; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 23:47:04 GMT
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 00:42:15 +0100 (CET)
From: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
X-Sender: grimsy@calypso.saturn
To: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <19980227192553.12373@uni-koblenz.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980228002935.8121A-100000@calypso.saturn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1533
Lines: 43

On Fri, 27 Feb 1998 ralf@uni-koblenz.de wrote:

> The exact bug is that one of the cache maintenance routines in
> include/asm-mips/r4kcache.h uses there wrong cachop for flushing the
> cache.

Oh.

> > understand what you mean, sorry :)  Well, this is not a big problem for me
> > anyway. The .68 kernel works. The main problem is the one with the
>            
> .68 isn't supposed to work.  The memory is laid out such that the buggy
> cache routine has a bit less of effect.

Hm, ok. But why is .68 on ftp.linux.sgi.com if it doesn't work, or isn't
even supposed to work?

> > harddrives (detecting them, but with the size of 0Mb, and the kernel can't
> > read the partition tables), and the one with the kernel paging request it
> > can't handle. Any ideas? 
> 
> Should all be the cache effect.

Doesn't it work for your?

I have some questions concerning the MIPS/Linux project. I think the FAQ
on the homepage is obsolete (sorry, you must have answered these questions
100 times by now :)

Is it possible to use MIPS/Linux yet, or is it too buggy? How much of the
X code is done? Are any of the SGI special devices, such as the cool
functions on the video card supported yet? Which kernel runs
linux.sgi.com (this one seems to be quite stable).

Maybe I'll join the project (if you allow me to). I don't know if I have
the time right now, quite busy programming for a demo project.

/Ulf Carlsson

-----------------------------------------
-     grimsy - http://grimsy.ml.org     -
-----------------------------------------


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Fri Feb 27 15:58:47 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id PAA53271 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:58:47 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA05310 for linux-list; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:58:10 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA05284 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:58:05 -0800
Received: from informatik.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.4.1]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id PAA21907
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 15:58:04 -0800
	env-from (ralf@mailhost.uni-koblenz.de)
Received: from thoma (ralf@thoma.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.4.61])
	by informatik.uni-koblenz.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id AAA10056;
	Sat, 28 Feb 1998 00:58:02 +0100 (MET)
Received: by thoma (SMI-8.6/KO-2.0)
	id AAA03598; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 00:58:00 +0100
Message-ID: <19980228005759.07317@uni-koblenz.de>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 00:57:59 +0100
From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
To: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
References: <19980227192553.12373@uni-koblenz.de> <Pine.LNX.3.96.980228002935.8121A-100000@calypso.saturn>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.84e
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980228002935.8121A-100000@calypso.saturn>; from Ulf Carlsson on Sat, Feb 28, 1998 at 12:42:15AM +0100
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1787
Lines: 52

On Sat, Feb 28, 1998 at 12:42:15AM +0100, Ulf Carlsson wrote:

> On Fri, 27 Feb 1998 ralf@uni-koblenz.de wrote:
> 
> > The exact bug is that one of the cache maintenance routines in
> > include/asm-mips/r4kcache.h uses there wrong cachop for flushing the
> > cache.
> 
> Oh.
> 
> > > understand what you mean, sorry :)  Well, this is not a big problem for me
> > > anyway. The .68 kernel works. The main problem is the one with the
> >            
> > .68 isn't supposed to work.  The memory is laid out such that the buggy
> > cache routine has a bit less of effect.
> 
> Hm, ok. But why is .68 on ftp.linux.sgi.com if it doesn't work, or isn't
> even supposed to work?

It's only supposed to fail for your configuration.

> > > harddrives (detecting them, but with the size of 0Mb, and the kernel can't
> > > read the partition tables), and the one with the kernel paging request it
> > > can't handle. Any ideas? 
> > 
> > Should all be the cache effect.
> 
> Doesn't it work for your?

Since I'm doing the thing it will always work for my hardware (hint, hint ...)

> I have some questions concerning the MIPS/Linux project. I think the FAQ
> on the homepage is obsolete (sorry, you must have answered these questions
> 100 times by now :)
> 
> Is it possible to use MIPS/Linux yet, or is it too buggy? How much of the

It's good for month of uptime.  Some apps are not that reliable.

> X code is done? Are any of the SGI special devices, such as the cool
> functions on the video card supported yet? Which kernel runs

Linux supports what god wanted to be supported, text mode :-)

> linux.sgi.com (this one seems to be quite stable).

It's called IRIX :-)

(And yes, the machine had over half a year uptime.  The IRIX developers on
the list will apreciate your praise :-)

  Ralf

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Fri Feb 27 16:19:06 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id QAA54305 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:19:06 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA10693 for linux-list; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:17:39 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA10686 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:17:37 -0800
Received: from lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (lager.engsoc.carleton.ca [134.117.69.26]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id QAA29278
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:17:35 -0800
	env-from (adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca)
Received: from localhost (adevries@localhost)
	by lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id TAA05001;
	Fri, 27 Feb 1998 19:17:28 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: lager.engsoc.carleton.ca: adevries owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 19:17:28 -0500 (EST)
From: Alex deVries <adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca>
To: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
cc: ralf@uni-koblenz.de, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980228002935.8121A-100000@calypso.saturn>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980227191414.20111D-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 843
Lines: 23


On Sat, 28 Feb 1998, Ulf Carlsson wrote:
> On Fri, 27 Feb 1998 ralf@uni-koblenz.de wrote:
> Hm, ok. But why is .68 on ftp.linux.sgi.com if it doesn't work, or isn't
> even supposed to work?

Really, because we're not making a very big point of ensuring that the ftp
site is up to date and accurate.  Same with the FAQ.  Yes, we should do a
better job at this, feel free to help out.

> Doesn't it work for your?

Definitely.  Alex3.med.iacnet.com works very well, and it really doesn't
every crash.  Certainly some of it could use some work (like partitioning,
modules, X, etc), but glibc, networking, etc are all there.

> Is it possible to use MIPS/Linux yet, or is it too buggy? How much of the
> X code is done? Are any of the SGI special devices, such as the cool

Miguel?  What's up with X exactly?  Are you short on hw specs?

- Alex


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Fri Feb 27 16:22:12 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id QAA53806 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:22:12 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA12058 for linux-list; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:21:39 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA12051 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:21:38 -0800
Received: from informatik.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.4.1]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id QAA00438
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:21:36 -0800
	env-from (ralf@mailhost.uni-koblenz.de)
Received: from thoma (ralf@thoma.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.4.61])
	by informatik.uni-koblenz.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id BAA16264;
	Sat, 28 Feb 1998 01:21:35 +0100 (MET)
Received: by thoma (SMI-8.6/KO-2.0)
	id BAA03618; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 01:21:33 +0100
Message-ID: <19980228012132.53451@uni-koblenz.de>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 01:21:32 +0100
From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
To: Alex deVries <adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca>
Cc: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
References: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980228002935.8121A-100000@calypso.saturn> <Pine.LNX.3.95.980227191414.20111D-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.84e
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980227191414.20111D-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca>; from Alex deVries on Fri, Feb 27, 1998 at 07:17:28PM -0500
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 188
Lines: 7

On Fri, Feb 27, 1998 at 07:17:28PM -0500, Alex deVries wrote:

> Miguel?  What's up with X exactly?  Are you short on hw specs?

It's more that days tend to have only 48 hours ...

  Ralf

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Fri Feb 27 16:24:33 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id QAA54511 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:24:33 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA12463 for linux-list; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:23:06 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA12453 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:23:05 -0800
Received: from lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (lager.engsoc.carleton.ca [134.117.69.26]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id QAA00777
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:23:04 -0800
	env-from (adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca)
Received: from localhost (adevries@localhost)
	by lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id TAA05137;
	Fri, 27 Feb 1998 19:23:05 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: lager.engsoc.carleton.ca: adevries owned process doing -bs
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 19:23:04 -0500 (EST)
From: Alex deVries <adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca>
To: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
cc: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: X...
In-Reply-To: <19980228012132.53451@uni-koblenz.de>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980227192215.20111E-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 323
Lines: 11


On Sat, 28 Feb 1998 ralf@uni-koblenz.de wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 27, 1998 at 07:17:28PM -0500, Alex deVries wrote:
> > Miguel?  What's up with X exactly?  Are you short on hw specs?
> It's more that days tend to have only 48 hours ...

Oh.  Uh, any parts that I can help out on?  I appear to have a weekend
free now.

- Alex


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Fri Feb 27 16:36:56 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id QAA53134 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:36:56 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA17213 for linux-list; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:35:54 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA17193 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:35:52 -0800
Received: from athena.nuclecu.unam.mx (athena.nuclecu.unam.mx [132.248.29.9]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id QAA04404
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:35:45 -0800
	env-from (miguel@athena.nuclecu.unam.mx)
Received: (from miguel@localhost)
	by athena.nuclecu.unam.mx (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA07976;
	Fri, 27 Feb 1998 18:35:29 -0600
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 18:35:29 -0600
Message-Id: <199802280035.SAA07976@athena.nuclecu.unam.mx>
From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel@nuclecu.unam.mx>
To: grimsy@varberg.se
CC: ralf@uni-koblenz.de, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
In-reply-to: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980228002935.8121A-100000@calypso.saturn> (message
	from Ulf Carlsson on Sat, 28 Feb 1998 00:42:15 +0100 (CET))
Subject: Re: installation problem.
X-Unix: is friendly, it is just selective about who its friends are.
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 523
Lines: 12


> Is it possible to use MIPS/Linux yet, or is it too buggy? How much of the
> X code is done? Are any of the SGI special devices, such as the cool
> functions on the video card supported yet? Which kernel runs
> linux.sgi.com (this one seems to be quite stable).

There is little code for the free X11 server written.  I can send my
bits to whoever wants them (they are based on what the kernel supports
for the IRIX X emulation, so we will end up supporting a scheme very
similar to what the IRIX X server has).

Miguel.

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Fri Feb 27 16:49:20 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id QAA56467 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:49:20 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA20404 for linux-list; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:48:31 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA20399 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:48:29 -0800
Received: from athena.nuclecu.unam.mx (athena.nuclecu.unam.mx [132.248.29.9]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id QAA07699
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 16:48:25 -0800
	env-from (miguel@athena.nuclecu.unam.mx)
Received: (from miguel@localhost)
	by athena.nuclecu.unam.mx (8.8.7/8.8.7) id SAA08090;
	Fri, 27 Feb 1998 18:47:59 -0600
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 18:47:59 -0600
Message-Id: <199802280047.SAA08090@athena.nuclecu.unam.mx>
From: Miguel de Icaza <miguel@nuclecu.unam.mx>
To: adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca
CC: grimsy@varberg.se, ralf@uni-koblenz.de, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
In-reply-to: 
	<Pine.LNX.3.95.980227191414.20111D-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca>
	(message from Alex deVries on Fri, 27 Feb 1998 19:17:28 -0500 (EST))
Subject: Re: installation problem.
X-Mexico: Este es un pais de orates, un pais amateur.
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 2096
Lines: 49


> > Is it possible to use MIPS/Linux yet, or is it too buggy? How much of the
> > X code is done? Are any of the SGI special devices, such as the cool
> 
> Miguel?  What's up with X exactly?  Are you short on hw specs?

No.  I am short on time.

I am rushing for a beta release of the gnome desktop thingie and until
then I am pretty busy.

For those who do not know: gnome is a user-friendly desktop that aims
at easing the usage of Unix computers.

Gnome provides a user friendly desktop, and aims at providing a
component framework for building large applications (components
modeled pretty much after microsoft's active-x, but we are using CORBA
for gluing stuff together instead of COM).  For more information
check: http://www.gnome.org and feel free to contribute to the
effort. 

Back to the X server: here is the status: the X server starts up on my
machine very happilly, but crashes the kernel sometime when clients
connect.  Not all clients crash the kernel, just some of them (if you
run an xterm or emacs you will crash the kernel). 

These are remote applications, so it is a fault in the Xserver support
in the kernel.  This happens in graphics mode, so if the kernel is
printing out a nice panic message, it never reaches the screen. 

What should be done to debug this is: inside panic() we need to
restore text mode manually (trivial to figure out from the sources,
there is some routine there) and figure out where the crash happened. 

Now, what might make debugging this a pain is that you require the
an Indy that is configured just like mine :-), as when I was doing the
X server code, I rushed to hardcode the inventory return code to
whatever my machine had, so you better have a newport that supports
24-bpp or you need to change the inventory bits (or better yet, fix
the inventory code) :-).

Getting the X server to run is trivial: just strace your X server in
IRIX and copy all of the files that are refereced by the X server.

Then create the special files in /dev with the major/minors that are
documented in the kernel and voila!

best gnoming wishes, 
Miguel.

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Fri Feb 27 17:29:25 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id RAA58534 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 17:29:25 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id RAA01540 for linux-list; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 17:28:50 -0800
Received: from oz.engr.sgi.com (oz.engr.sgi.com [150.166.42.13]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id RAA01528; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 17:28:48 -0800
Received: (from ariel@localhost) by oz.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id RAA31568; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 17:28:37 -0800 (PST)
From: ariel@oz.engr.sgi.com (Ariel Faigon)
Message-Id: <199802280128.RAA31568@oz.engr.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: installation problem.
To: grimsy@varberg.se (Ulf Carlsson)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 17:28:37 -0800 (PST)
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (SGI/Linux mailing list)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980228002935.8121A-100000@calypso.saturn> from "Ulf Carlsson" at Feb 28, 98 00:42:15 am
Reply-To: ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (Ariel Faigon)
Organization: Silicon Graphics Inc.
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME5a]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1663
Lines: 43

:
:On Fri, 27 Feb 1998 ralf@uni-koblenz.de wrote:
:
:> .68 isn't supposed to work.  The memory is laid out such that the buggy
:> cache routine has a bit less of effect.
:
:Hm, ok. But why is .68 on ftp.linux.sgi.com if it doesn't work, or isn't
:even supposed to work?
:
We really need someone who runs linux and understands the details
to clean up the web site and make sure the FAQ is current and
the precompiled kernels are stable and those that are bad
are deleted etc.

If you vounteer, please send me your ssh public key and I
give you an account on *.linux.sgi.com in no time  :-)


:
:I have some questions concerning the MIPS/Linux project. I think the FAQ
:on the homepage is obsolete (sorry, you must have answered these questions
:100 times by now :)
:
:Is it possible to use MIPS/Linux yet, or is it too buggy? How much of the
:X code is done? Are any of the SGI special devices, such as the cool
:functions on the video card supported yet? Which kernel runs
:linux.sgi.com (this one seems to be quite stable).
:
Linux on SGI Indy's is quite stable once it boots.  We have about
five or so users that use it daily as their development platform.
We seem to have some problems with some HW configs but not enough
installed base to figure all this out.  Maybe now that Ralf is
back we may see some progress.  Ralf is an amazing MIPS and Linux
hacker, we probably need someone else who is less of a hacker but
more of a documenter to take charge of the web site.

:Maybe I'll join the project (if you allow me to). I don't know if I have
:the time right now, quite busy programming for a demo project.
:
You'll be blessed if you join.

-- 
Peace, Ariel

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Fri Feb 27 18:19:56 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id SAA28648 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 18:19:55 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id SAA13967 for linux-list; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 18:19:25 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id SAA13958; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 18:19:24 -0800
Received: from seaside2.varberg.se (mail.varberg.se [193.13.151.101]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id SAA29781; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 18:19:22 -0800
	env-from (grimsy@seaside.se)
Received: from calypso.saturn (grimsy@dialup115-2-14.swipnet.se [130.244.115.78]) by seaside2.varberg.se (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id CAA11562; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 02:26:06 GMT
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 03:21:14 +0100 (CET)
From: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
X-Sender: grimsy@calypso.saturn
To: Ariel Faigon <ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
cc: SGI/Linux mailing list <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <199802280128.RAA31568@oz.engr.sgi.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980228030542.8693B-100000@calypso.saturn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1708
Lines: 37

On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, Ariel Faigon wrote:

> We really need someone who runs linux and understands the details
> to clean up the web site and make sure the FAQ is current and
> the precompiled kernels are stable and those that are bad
> are deleted etc.
> If you vounteer, please send me your ssh public key and I
> give you an account on *.linux.sgi.com in no time  :-)

Well, I could done that. I have only one programming project right now and
this isn't even programming, just writing a FAQ and updating a homepage. 
There are still some reasons why I can't help you with this right now: 

1. I know almost nothing about MIPS/Linux. Well, as soon as it boots for
   me will I study all its advantages and disadvantages.
2. My internet connection is not very fast. Only modem at home. Well, I
   have a faster connection at school, but you know. Serving a ftp
   with 10mb kernels is not a job for me. (well, I may take charge of the
   www site some day in the (near?) future).

> Linux on SGI Indy's is quite stable once it boots.  We have about
> five or so users that use it daily as their development platform.
Developing MIPS/Linux or developing something else?
How many MIPS/Linux are there right now? 10? 50? 100?

> We seem to have some problems with some HW configs but not enough
> installed base to figure all this out.  Maybe now that Ralf is
> back we may see some progress.  Ralf is an amazing MIPS and Linux
> hacker, we probably need someone else who is less of a hacker but
> more of a documenter to take charge of the web site.
How many coders are there for MIPS/Linux, just Ralf?

> You'll be blessed if you join.
As I said I have to install the funky shit first of all. :-)

- grimsy


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Fri Feb 27 22:24:01 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id WAA81843 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 22:24:00 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id WAA07656 for linux-list; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 22:23:22 -0800
Received: from oz.engr.sgi.com (oz.engr.sgi.com [150.166.42.13]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id WAA07648; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 22:23:20 -0800
Received: (from ariel@localhost) by oz.engr.sgi.com (971110.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id WAA33234; Fri, 27 Feb 1998 22:23:10 -0800 (PST)
From: ariel@oz.engr.sgi.com (Ariel Faigon)
Message-Id: <199802280623.WAA33234@oz.engr.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: installation problem.
To: grimsy@varberg.se (Ulf Carlsson)
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 1998 22:23:09 -0800 (PST)
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (SGI/Linux mailing list)
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980228030542.8693B-100000@calypso.saturn> from "Ulf Carlsson" at Feb 28, 98 03:21:14 am
Reply-To: ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (Ariel Faigon)
Organization: Silicon Graphics Inc.
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME5a]
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 1043
Lines: 24

:
:> Linux on SGI Indy's is quite stable once it boots.  We have about
:> five or so users that use it daily as their development platform.
:Developing MIPS/Linux or developing something else?
:How many MIPS/Linux are there right now? 10? 50? 100?
:
I would assume around 10... but I don't know for sure, really.
There have been many more downloads.  We are still virtual console
(no X) dependent and a few Indy devices (such as sound) are not
supported.

:> We seem to have some problems with some HW configs but not enough
:> installed base to figure all this out.  Maybe now that Ralf is
:> back we may see some progress.  Ralf is an amazing MIPS and Linux
:> hacker, we probably need someone else who is less of a hacker but
:> more of a documenter to take charge of the web site.
:How many coders are there for MIPS/Linux, just Ralf?
:
Ralf, Miguel, Mike Shaver, Alex deVries, Thomas Bogendoerfer,
Alan Cox.  There have been a few more in the past, but most have
a real job too so they are working on this on and off...

-- 
Peace, Ariel

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Sat Feb 28 02:32:54 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id CAA86830 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 02:32:54 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id CAA28107 for linux-list; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 02:32:21 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id CAA28102; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 02:32:19 -0800
Received: from seaside2.varberg.se (mail.varberg.se [193.13.151.101]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id CAA14213; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 02:32:18 -0800
	env-from (grimsy@seaside.se)
Received: from calypso.saturn (grimsy@dialup112-2-51.swipnet.se [130.244.112.115]) by seaside2.varberg.se (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id KAA13114; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 10:39:12 GMT
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 11:34:10 +0100 (CET)
From: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
X-Sender: grimsy@calypso.saturn
To: Ariel Faigon <ariel@oz.engr.sgi.com>
cc: SGI/Linux mailing list <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <199802280623.WAA33234@oz.engr.sgi.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980228113344.9037A-100000@calypso.saturn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 294
Lines: 10

On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, Ariel Faigon wrote:

> Ralf, Miguel, Mike Shaver, Alex deVries, Thomas Bogendoerfer,
> Alan Cox.  There have been a few more in the past, but most have
> a real job too so they are working on this on and off...

So, how do you get money if you don't have a job?

- grimsy


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Sat Feb 28 08:15:29 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id IAA100872 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 08:15:29 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id IAA22547 for linux-list; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 08:14:49 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id IAA22542; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 08:14:47 -0800
Received: from snowcrash.cymru.net (snowcrash.cymru.net [163.164.160.3]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id IAA00579; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 08:14:43 -0800
	env-from (alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk)
Received: from the-village.bc.nu (the-village.bc.nu [163.164.160.21]) by snowcrash.cymru.net (8.8.7/8.7.1) with SMTP id QAA28724; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 16:14:17 GMT
Received: by the-village.bc.nu (Smail3.1.29.1 #2)
	id m0y8p37-0005FsC; Sat, 28 Feb 98 16:23 GMT
Message-Id: <m0y8p37-0005FsC@the-village.bc.nu>
From: alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk (Alan Cox)
Subject: Re: installation problem.
To: ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 16:23:41 +0000 (GMT)
Cc: grimsy@varberg.se, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
In-Reply-To: <199802280623.WAA33234@oz.engr.sgi.com> from "Ariel Faigon" at Feb 27, 98 10:23:09 pm
Content-Type: text
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 322
Lines: 7

> Alan Cox.  There have been a few more in the past, but most have
> a real job too so they are working on this on and off...

SGIwise Im sort of stuck at the moment waiting for things to appear. If someone
can get me/email me the PS/2 mouse docs for the indy I'll attack that if
Miguel is still having it lock up on him


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Sat Feb 28 08:36:29 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id IAA101464 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 08:36:29 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id IAA24322 for linux-list; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 08:35:59 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id IAA24317 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 08:35:57 -0800
Received: from mdhill.interlog.com (mdhill.interlog.com [199.212.154.112]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id IAA03693
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 08:35:55 -0800
	env-from (mike@mdhill.interlog.com)
Received: (from mike@localhost) by mdhill.interlog.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id LAA01492; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 11:35:01 -0500
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 11:35:01 -0500
Message-Id: <199802281635.LAA01492@mdhill.interlog.com>
From: Michael Hill <mdhill@interlog.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980228113344.9037A-100000@calypso.saturn>
References: <199802280623.WAA33234@oz.engr.sgi.com>
	<Pine.LNX.3.96.980228113344.9037A-100000@calypso.saturn>
X-Mailer: VM 6.34 under 20.3 "Vatican City" XEmacs  Lucid
Reply-To: mdhill@interlog.com
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 483
Lines: 18

Ulf Carlsson writes:
 > On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, Ariel Faigon wrote:
 > 
 > > Ralf, Miguel, Mike Shaver, Alex deVries, Thomas Bogendoerfer,
 > > Alan Cox.  There have been a few more in the past, but most have
 > > a real job too so they are working on this on and off...
 > 
 > So, how do you get money if you don't have a job?

If someone would post a response to the list, I could free up some time with 
two weeks' notice.

Mike
-- 
Michael Hill
Toronto, Canada
mdhill@interlog.com


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Sat Feb 28 08:50:00 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id IAA102145 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 08:50:00 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id IAA25446 for linux-list; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 08:49:28 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id IAA25441; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 08:49:26 -0800
Received: from informatik.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.4.1]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id IAA05548; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 08:49:24 -0800
	env-from (ralf@mailhost.uni-koblenz.de)
Received: from thoma (ralf@thoma.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.4.61])
	by informatik.uni-koblenz.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA09741;
	Sat, 28 Feb 1998 17:49:23 +0100 (MET)
Received: by thoma (SMI-8.6/KO-2.0)
	id RAA04903; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 17:49:22 +0100
Message-ID: <19980228174921.30289@uni-koblenz.de>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 17:49:21 +0100
From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
To: Alan Cox <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk>
Cc: ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, grimsy@varberg.se, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
References: <199802280623.WAA33234@oz.engr.sgi.com> <m0y8p37-0005FsC@the-village.bc.nu>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.84e
In-Reply-To: <m0y8p37-0005FsC@the-village.bc.nu>; from Alan Cox on Sat, Feb 28, 1998 at 04:23:41PM +0000
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 748
Lines: 16

On Sat, Feb 28, 1998 at 04:23:41PM +0000, Alan Cox wrote:

> > Alan Cox.  There have been a few more in the past, but most have
> > a real job too so they are working on this on and off...
> 
> SGIwise Im sort of stuck at the moment waiting for things to appear. If someone
> can get me/email me the PS/2 mouse docs for the indy I'll attack that if
> Miguel is still having it lock up on him

Basically the Indy PS/2 hardware is the same as on PCs, it's just that both
mouse and keyboard are using the same interrupt and we therefore need some
special magic.  When cleaning up in the keyboard driver I somehow lost the
PS/2 magic stuff that calls aux_interrupt().  Old CVS kernel versions
should have that stuff still in the keyboard code.

  Ralf

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Sat Feb 28 08:54:17 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id IAA102346 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 08:54:17 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id IAA25884 for linux-list; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 08:53:56 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id IAA25880 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 08:53:55 -0800
Received: from informatik.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.4.1]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id IAA06104
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 08:53:53 -0800
	env-from (ralf@mailhost.uni-koblenz.de)
Received: from thoma (ralf@thoma.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.4.61])
	by informatik.uni-koblenz.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id RAA09814;
	Sat, 28 Feb 1998 17:53:52 +0100 (MET)
Received: by thoma (SMI-8.6/KO-2.0)
	id RAA04912; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 17:53:51 +0100
Message-ID: <19980228175350.55159@uni-koblenz.de>
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 17:53:50 +0100
From: ralf@uni-koblenz.de
To: mdhill@interlog.com
Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Subject: Re: installation problem.
References: <199802280623.WAA33234@oz.engr.sgi.com> <Pine.LNX.3.96.980228113344.9037A-100000@calypso.saturn> <199802281635.LAA01492@mdhill.interlog.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
X-Mailer: Mutt 0.84e
In-Reply-To: <199802281635.LAA01492@mdhill.interlog.com>; from Michael Hill on Sat, Feb 28, 1998 at 11:35:01AM -0500
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 957
Lines: 22

On Sat, Feb 28, 1998 at 11:35:01AM -0500, Michael Hill wrote:

> Ulf Carlsson writes:
>  > On Fri, 27 Feb 1998, Ariel Faigon wrote:
>  > 
>  > > Ralf, Miguel, Mike Shaver, Alex deVries, Thomas Bogendoerfer,
>  > > Alan Cox.  There have been a few more in the past, but most have
>  > > a real job too so they are working on this on and off...
>  > 
>  > So, how do you get money if you don't have a job?
> 
> If someone would post a response to the list, I could free up some time with 
> two weeks' notice.

The MIPS embedded market is large enough to give you a living on the base
of Linux/MIPS.  I wouldn't dare to say that about the Linux for SGI market
yet ...  The big problem is just finding the initial customers.  Living on
the base of Linux is however getting easier and easier.  About half of my
income the last year was based directly or indirectly on Linux and it's
getting more.  And yes, it's good enough to afford non-rusty cars ;-)

  Ralf

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Sat Feb 28 13:05:42 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id NAA110302 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 13:05:42 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA20736 for linux-list; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 13:05:10 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA20731 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 13:05:09 -0800
Received: from hp817.speedware.com (hp817.speedware.com [192.197.116.3]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id NAA12328
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 13:05:04 -0800
	env-from (chrisr@hp817.speedware.com)
Received: (from chrisr@localhost)
	by hp817.speedware.com (8.8.5/8.8.5) id QAA17293
	for linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 16:04:59 -0500 (EST)
From: "Chris. Rupnik" <chrisr@hp817.speedware.com>
Message-Id: <199802282104.QAA17293@hp817.speedware.com>
Subject: Net Booting a MAGNUM pc-50
To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 98 16:04:59 EST
Mailer: Elm [revision: 70.85.2.1]
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 234
Lines: 9

Hi
 I am attempting to netboot a mips machine. I have compiled
 and installed the BFSD server, and now it appears that i am 
 looking for a 'sash'. Can someone please point me in the right
 direction for this booter?

 Thanks

 Chris

From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Sat Feb 28 14:47:36 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id OAA113140 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 14:47:35 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA29921 for linux-list; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 14:47:07 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA29892 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 14:47:06 -0800
Received: from seaside2.varberg.se (mail.varberg.se [193.13.151.101]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id OAA27837
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 14:47:04 -0800
	env-from (grimsy@seaside.se)
Received: from calypso.saturn (grimsy@dialup90-3-40.swipnet.se [130.244.90.168]) by seaside2.varberg.se (8.8.5/8.6.9) with SMTP id WAA06869 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 22:47:16 GMT
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 23:48:57 +0100 (CET)
From: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
X-Sender: grimsy@calypso.saturn
To: SGI/Linux mailing list <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Subject: SGI/Linux vs. Linux/MIPS
In-Reply-To: <199802280128.RAA31568@oz.engr.sgi.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980228234632.10491A-100000@calypso.saturn>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 64
Lines: 4

Are SGI/Linux and Linux/MIPS two different projects?

- grimsy


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Sat Feb 28 15:10:19 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id PAA114414 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 15:10:18 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA01945 for linux-list; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 15:09:48 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA01937 for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 15:09:46 -0800
Received: from lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (lager.engsoc.carleton.ca [134.117.69.26]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id PAA01556
	for <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 15:09:45 -0800
	env-from (adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca)
Received: from localhost (adevries@localhost)
	by lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id SAA06913;
	Sat, 28 Feb 1998 18:09:47 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: lager.engsoc.carleton.ca: adevries owned process doing -bs
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 18:09:47 -0500 (EST)
From: Alex deVries <adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca>
To: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
cc: SGI/Linux mailing list <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: SGI/Linux vs. Linux/MIPS
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980228234632.10491A-100000@calypso.saturn>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980228180727.5143A-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 442
Lines: 16


On Sat, 28 Feb 1998, Ulf Carlsson wrote:
> 
> Are SGI/Linux and Linux/MIPS two different projects?

I think the answer is "sort of".

Certainly the software ports for various MIPS architectures are similiar,
including the kernel.  SGI/Linux is really just an instance of big endian
MIPS/Linux. 

The value added in SGI Linux is that there's a company standing somewhat
behind it, offering help with some of the SGI-specific issues.

- Alex


From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com  Sat Feb 28 18:14:36 1998
Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by neteng.engr.sgi.com (980205.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id SAA121778 for <linux-archive@neteng.engr.sgi.com>; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 18:14:36 -0800 (PST)
Return-Path: <owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id SAA18231 for linux-list; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 18:13:56 -0800
Received: from sgi.sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id SAA18226; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 18:13:54 -0800
Received: from lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (lager.engsoc.carleton.ca [134.117.69.26]) by sgi.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/970507) via ESMTP id SAA27890; Sat, 28 Feb 1998 18:13:51 -0800
	env-from (adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca)
Received: from localhost (adevries@localhost)
	by lager.engsoc.carleton.ca (8.8.7/8.8.7) with SMTP id VAA13557;
	Sat, 28 Feb 1998 21:13:54 -0500
X-Authentication-Warning: lager.engsoc.carleton.ca: adevries owned process doing -bs
Date: Sat, 28 Feb 1998 21:13:54 -0500 (EST)
From: Alex deVries <adevries@engsoc.carleton.ca>
To: Ulf Carlsson <grimsy@varberg.se>
cc: Ariel Faigon <ariel@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>,
        SGI/Linux mailing list <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com>
Subject: Re: installation problem.
In-Reply-To: <Pine.LNX.3.96.980228030542.8693B-100000@calypso.saturn>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.3.95.980228211156.5143D-100000@lager.engsoc.carleton.ca>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII
Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com
Precedence: bulk
Content-Length: 735
Lines: 17


On Sat, 28 Feb 1998, Ulf Carlsson wrote:
> 1. I know almost nothing about MIPS/Linux. Well, as soon as it boots for
>    me will I study all its advantages and disadvantages.
> 2. My internet connection is not very fast. Only modem at home. Well, I
>    have a faster connection at school, but you know. Serving a ftp
>    with 10mb kernels is not a job for me. (well, I may take charge of the
>    www site some day in the (near?) future).

That's where SGI comes in nicely, providing us all with ftp.linux.sgi.com.

I actually have some unfinished HOWTO docs you're welcome to have, but the
problem with them is that we haven't really realized a viable installation
method yet.  Still gotta get the initrd stuff running...

- Alex


