From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sun Aug 1 01:32:06 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA06642 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 01:32:05 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id QAA14533; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 16:28:10 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA22112 for linux-list; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 16:23:11 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA05574 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 16:22:59 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1] (may be forged)) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id QAA00185 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 16:22:57 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-10.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.10]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA17901 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 01:22:53 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA20450; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 01:22:04 +0200 Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 01:22:03 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Mark Mitchell Cc: ralf@gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com, thockin@cobaltnet.com, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: MIPS/ELF linker Message-ID: <19990801012203.U12249@uni-koblenz.de> References: <19990731233150.Q12249@uni-koblenz.de> <19990731152842N.mitchell@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <19990731152842N.mitchell@codesourcery.com>; from Mark Mitchell on Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 03:28:42PM -0700 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 2388 Lines: 57 On Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 03:28:42PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Thanks for trying the MIPS backend out. I'm eager to shake out the > bugs. It seems pretty solid on IRIX6, now, but I'm sure there are > issues remaining on other platforms. > > + /* Assume no jalx is required */ > + *require_jalxp = false; > + > > REQUIRE_JALXP is set unconditionally a few lines down. Why doesn't > that do the trick? The caller should not be looking at the value of > require_jalx unless calculate_relocation returns a successful error > code. So the caller _bfd_mips_elf_relocate_section does not behave appropriately when mips_elf_calculate_relocation returns bfd_reloc_undefined. Search for bfd_reloc_undefined in mips_elf_calculate_relocation; it's being returned before an actual value gets assigned to *require_jalxp. > /usr/bin/mips-linux-ld: not enough GOT space for local GOT entries > > Probably some relocation is requiring a local GOT entry, but we're not > allocating it. Look for this code in check_relocs: > > if (!h && (r_type == R_MIPS_CALL_LO16 > || r_type == R_MIPS_GOT_LO16 > || r_type == R_MIPS_GOT_DISP)) > { > /* We may need a local GOT entry for this relocation. We > don't count R_MIPS_HI16 or R_MIPS_GOT16 relocations > because they are always followed by a R_MIPS_LO16 > relocation for the value. We don't R_MIPS_GOT_PAGE > because we can estimate the maximum number of pages > needed by looking at the size of the segment. > > This estimation is very conservative since we can merge > duplicate entries in the GOT. In order to be less > conservative, we could actually build the GOT here, > rather than in relocate_section. */ > g->local_gotno++; > sgot->_raw_size += MIPS_ELF_GOT_SIZE (dynobj); > } > > Probably this code is not firing in some case where it should be > firing. Therefore, we're not adding enough GOT space. That might > help track down the bug. > > If not, feel free to send me the files on your link-line in a giant > tar-ball, together with how your configuring binutils, and I'll try to > duplicate and fix your problem. I'll send you a non-giant tarball of 73kb which will demonstrate the problem. Just run the Makefile in the archive. The linker has been configured for the target mips-linux which is a standard MIPS/ELF target. Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sun Aug 1 01:51:42 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA13662 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 01:51:41 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id QAA08439; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 16:47:51 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA64699 for linux-list; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 16:44:38 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA50232 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 16:44:36 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id QAA05246 for ; Sat, 31 Jul 1999 16:44:34 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-10.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.10]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA18436 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 01:44:32 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA20674; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 01:44:11 +0200 Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 01:44:11 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Mark Mitchell Cc: ralf@gnu.org, binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com, thockin@cobaltnet.com, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: MIPS/ELF linker Message-ID: <19990801014411.V12249@uni-koblenz.de> References: <19990731233150.Q12249@uni-koblenz.de> <19990731152842N.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <19990801012203.U12249@uni-koblenz.de> <19990731164237C.mitchell@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <19990731164237C.mitchell@codesourcery.com>; from Mark Mitchell on Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 04:42:37PM -0700 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 502 Lines: 14 On Sat, Jul 31, 1999 at 04:42:37PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > Ralf -- > > Thanks for the tarball. I'll not be able to look at this until > tomorrow, but I will do so then. Ok, I'm looking into things in parallel if I find the time. I'll also try to rebuild GNU libc for MIPS. That has historically proven to be a bone breaker for ld. The last time I tried a few weeks ago I got ~500 assertion messages from ld just alone for the libc final link ... Will let you know how things go. Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sun Aug 1 10:45:59 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id KAA05895 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 10:45:58 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id BAA01680; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 01:41:11 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id BAA22749 for linux-list; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 01:37:23 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id BAA00154 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 01:37:20 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (sonnie@263.net) Received: from ns.cstnet-hf.net.cn ([210.72.12.1]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id BAA04763 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 01:37:15 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (sonnie@263.net) From: sonnie@263.net Received: from ustc.edu.cn (hpe25.nic.ustc.edu.cn [202.38.64.1]) by ns.cstnet-hf.net.cn (8.8.7/8.8.6) with SMTP id QAA20203 for ; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 16:31:53 -0800 Message-Id: <199908020031.QAA20203@ns.cstnet-hf.net.cn> Received: from crimson.fsc.ustc.edu.cn by ustc.edu.cn with SMTP (8.6.10/16.2) id QAA29028; Sun, 1 Aug 1999 16:37:36 +0800 Date: Sun, 1 Aug 1999 16:37:36 +0800 Subject: IRIX 5.2?? Apparently-To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 166 Lines: 7 I have a IRIS-Crimson running IRIX5.2. In order to track the SGI/linux project, should I upgrade 5.2 to a higher version? Can I do this FREELY? Best regards, sonnie From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Mon Aug 2 23:55:20 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA31248 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 23:55:18 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id OAA07407; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 14:52:02 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA92253 for linux-list; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 14:50:31 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA03439 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 14:50:28 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id OAA03545 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 14:50:26 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-22.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.22]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA08871 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 23:50:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id TAA28990; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 19:59:32 +0200 Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 19:59:31 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: MIPS gas bug & fix Message-ID: <19990802195931.A28984@uni-koblenz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 633 Lines: 19 Hi, the cvs version of gas has a tiny typo which prevents it from swapping an instruction preceeding a jump or branch in most cases. The fix is trivial and appended below. Ralf --- tc-mips.c.orig Mon Aug 2 10:47:15 1999 +++ tc-mips.c Mon Aug 2 10:47:04 1999 @@ -2099,7 +2099,7 @@ || (mips_opts.mips16 && prev_insn_fixp) /* If the previous instruction is a sync, sync.l, or sync.p, we can not swap. */ - || (prev_pinfo && INSN_SYNC)) + || (prev_pinfo & INSN_SYNC)) { /* We could do even better for unconditional branches to portions of this object file; we could pick up the From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Mon Aug 2 23:04:04 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA21315 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 23:03:51 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id NAA08835; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 13:57:58 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA60217 for linux-list; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 13:53:25 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from fir.engr.sgi.com (fir.engr.sgi.com [150.166.40.90]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id NAA18127; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 13:53:21 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (wje@fir.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from wje@localhost) by fir.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA14295; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 13:53:15 -0700 From: "William J. Earl" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14246.1339.269402.396117@fir.engr.sgi.com> Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 13:53:15 -0700 (PDT) To: "Andrew R. Baker" Cc: Linux SGI Subject: Re: EISA support In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under Emacs 19.34.1 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1516 Lines: 32 Andrew R. Baker writes: > > While working in EISA support for the Indigo2 I have run across some > interesting design decisions and I would like to get some feedback. > > First is interupt handling. On the Indigo2 all the EISA interupts and > mapped down to a single INT2 interrupt. In other words, an [E]ISA card > generates an interrupt, which in turn, generates an INT2 interrupt, which > generates a CPU interrupt. This causes a problem because current device > drivers do a "request_irq" call to allocate an interrupt, on the Indy and > Indigo2, this procedure allocates an INT2/3 irq. ASFAIK, this means that > to be supported on the Indigo2, the device driver needs to call something > else like "request_isa_irq", so that it can be allocated properly. I see > two ways of implementing this. The first is easier to implement, but > looks slightly grotesque and would involve lines like: > > #ifndef CONFIG_SGI_EISA > request_irq(....); > #else > request_isa_irq(....); > #endif > > the other would be to create a "request_isa_irq" procedure that defaults > to "request_irq" in most architectures. > > Does anyone have any comments or suggestions on this? Suppose you define a range of request_irq() index values which correspond to EISA interrupts. The generic EISA interrupt would always be enabled, and the selective masking would apply to various bits in the EISA interrupt controller, in much the way that the cascading interrupts in INT2 and INT3 are handled. From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Tue Aug 3 00:14:48 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA32525 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 00:14:46 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA08701; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:11:51 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA10174 for linux-list; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:08:26 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA12586 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:08:23 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA01425 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:08:19 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-22.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.22]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA23351 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 00:08:16 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA29683; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 00:06:16 +0200 Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 00:06:15 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Andrew R. Baker" Cc: Linux SGI Subject: Re: EISA support Message-ID: <19990803000615.A29290@uni-koblenz.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: ; from Andrew R. Baker on Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 08:51:06PM -0500 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 1685 Lines: 36 On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 08:51:06PM -0500, Andrew R. Baker wrote: > While working in EISA support for the Indigo2 I have run across some > interesting design decisions and I would like to get some feedback. > > First is interupt handling. On the Indigo2 all the EISA interupts and > mapped down to a single INT2 interrupt. In other words, an [E]ISA card > generates an interrupt, which in turn, generates an INT2 interrupt, which > generates a CPU interrupt. This causes a problem because current device > drivers do a "request_irq" call to allocate an interrupt, on the Indy and > Indigo2, this procedure allocates an INT2/3 irq. ASFAIK, this means that > to be supported on the Indigo2, the device driver needs to call something > else like "request_isa_irq", so that it can be allocated properly. I see > two ways of implementing this. The first is easier to implement, but > looks slightly grotesque and would involve lines like: > > #ifndef CONFIG_SGI_EISA > request_irq(....); > #else > request_isa_irq(....); > #endif > > the other would be to create a "request_isa_irq" procedure that defaults > to "request_irq" in most architectures. > > Does anyone have any comments or suggestions on this? The solution which we're using for other systems is to number the interrupts such that 0 ... 15 are the (E)ISA interrupts; all other system specific interrupts use higher numbers. In such a scenario request_irq() will essentially just be a demultiplexer which for (E)ISA interrupt numbers calls request_isa_irq() etc. You really should try to leave the interrupt numbers unchanged as they are; basically every (E)ISA interrupt driver has it's numbers hardwired. Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Tue Aug 3 00:33:31 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA01252 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 00:33:23 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id PAA15012; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:30:07 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA31525 for linux-list; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:28:35 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA50818 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:28:33 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA08760 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:28:30 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-22.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.22]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA11170 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 00:28:28 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA29839; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 00:26:24 +0200 Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 00:26:24 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Andrew R. Baker" Cc: Linux SGI Subject: Re: EISA support Message-ID: <19990803002624.C29290@uni-koblenz.de> References: <19990803000615.A29290@uni-koblenz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: ; from Andrew R. Baker on Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 01:17:19AM -0500 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 1000 Lines: 20 On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 01:17:19AM -0500, Andrew R. Baker wrote: > On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > The solution which we're using for other systems is to number the > > interrupts such that 0 ... 15 are the (E)ISA interrupts; all other > > system specific interrupts use higher numbers. In such a scenario > > request_irq() will essentially just be a demultiplexer which for > > (E)ISA interrupt numbers calls request_isa_irq() etc. You really > > should try to leave the interrupt numbers unchanged as they are; > > basically every (E)ISA interrupt driver has it's numbers hardwired. > > That's basically what William Earl suggested. I am going to change the > SGINT_XXX defines in sgint23.h to leave space for the (E)ISA interrupts > and get change any absolute references (like in the SCSI driver) to things > like "SGINT_LOCAL0 + 1". Is there anything else I should allocate some > space for? No, but I'd prefer symbolic names like SGINT_WD93_1 over SGINT_LOCAL0 + 1. Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Tue Aug 3 00:44:07 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA07761 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 00:44:05 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA04075; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:40:00 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA31031 for linux-list; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:37:05 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA82119 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:36:54 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA00455 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:36:52 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-22.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.22]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA18463 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 00:36:48 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA29879; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 00:32:06 +0200 Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 00:31:31 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "H.J. Lu" Cc: linuxgcc , egcs@egcs.cygnus.com, GNU C Library , Kenneth Albanowski , Kenneth Osterberg , Mat Hostetter , Andy Dougherty , Brian Bourgault , Warner Losh , Michael Meissner , Ron Guilmette , John Polstra , Galen Hazelwood , Linas Vepstas , Feher Janos , linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: binutils 2.9.5.0.4 is released. Message-ID: <19990803003131.D29290@uni-koblenz.de> References: <19990802185200.00C6C57BA@ocean.lucon.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <19990802185200.00C6C57BA@ocean.lucon.org>; from H.J. Lu on Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 11:52:00AM -0700 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 946 Lines: 20 On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 11:52:00AM -0700, H.J. Lu wrote: > This is the beta release of binutils 2.9.5.0.4 for Linux, which is > based on binutils 1999 0801 plus various changes. It is purely for > Linux, although it has been tested on Solaris/Sparc and Solaris/x86 > from time to time. > > I merged a MIPS gas patch from binutils 2.9.1.0.25 to the current > binutils and there are many changes in MIPS/ELF in bfd. I'd like to > hear reports on Linux/MIPS. MIPS users should continue to use the latest 2.8.1-based releases available from ftp.linux.sgi.com. All newer linker have heavy bugs which will result in linker crashes, bad kernels and more. I especially have to warn about the binutils from Cygnus' anonymous CVS. At this time the MIPS support in that binutils versions is undergoing heavy rewrite in order to support the N32 ABI and as a temporary side effect they are therefore currently completly unusable for Linux/MIPS. Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Tue Aug 3 00:49:32 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA08180 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 00:49:31 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id PAA18199; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:46:13 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA85591 for linux-list; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:44:13 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from fir.engr.sgi.com (fir.engr.sgi.com [150.166.40.90]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id PAA44137; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:44:11 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (wje@fir.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from wje@localhost) by fir.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA14846; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:44:10 -0700 From: "William J. Earl" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14246.7994.461082.434930@fir.engr.sgi.com> Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:44:10 -0700 (PDT) To: "Andrew R. Baker" Cc: "William J. Earl" , Linux SGI Subject: Re: EISA support In-Reply-To: References: <14246.1339.269402.396117@fir.engr.sgi.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under Emacs 19.34.1 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1741 Lines: 32 Andrew R. Baker writes: > > > On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, William J. Earl wrote: ... > > Suppose you define a range of request_irq() index values which > > correspond to EISA interrupts. The generic EISA interrupt would always > > be enabled, and the selective masking would apply to various bits in the > > EISA interrupt controller, in much the way that the cascading interrupts > > in INT2 and INT3 are handled. > > I hadn't even thought about doing it that way, but after looking at the > existing interupt code, it shouldn't be much of a problem. My biggest > concern is maintaining compatability with the existing drivers. From what > I can tell, they all grab IRQs in the range of 1-15 (the available range > for EISA on x86 machines). So the best course of action is to shift the > virtual IRQ numbers up to start at 16, and put the EISA irqs on the 0-15 > range. Are there any major things I should consider before doing this? > Are there any arguments against this? I see that some drivers use NR_IRQS to form an IRQ_ports[] array, to map from IRQ to board object, as in serial.c, whereas others, such as riscom8.c, wire in 16 as the limit. Still, you could make probe_irq_on() and probe_irq_off() actually work for an Indy and Indigo2, and simply declare broken any drives which do not use NR_IRQS and probe using the probe_irq_* routines. The biggest problem with that approach is that NR_IRQS is 64 on mips, which means that probe_irq_on() and probe_irq_off() would need a different interface (long long instead of int, to allow 64-bit IRQ bit maps on 32-bit kernel). Changing the MIPS symbolic IRQ mapping to put EISA in the bottom 16 slots is probably the course of least resistance. From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Tue Aug 3 01:07:07 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA09632 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 01:07:02 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id QAA21520; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:03:32 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA40959 for linux-list; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:00:53 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from fir.engr.sgi.com (fir.engr.sgi.com [150.166.40.90]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id QAA12465; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:00:47 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (wje@fir.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from wje@localhost) by fir.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA14945; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:00:46 -0700 From: "William J. Earl" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14246.8990.201459.912911@fir.engr.sgi.com> Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:00:46 -0700 (PDT) To: Ralf Baechle Cc: "Andrew R. Baker" , Linux SGI Subject: Re: EISA support In-Reply-To: <19990803000615.A29290@uni-koblenz.de> References: <19990803000615.A29290@uni-koblenz.de> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under Emacs 19.34.1 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 732 Lines: 14 Ralf Baechle writes: ... > The solution which we're using for other systems is to number the > interrupts such that 0 ... 15 are the (E)ISA interrupts; all other > system specific interrupts use higher numbers. In such a scenario > request_irq() will essentially just be a demultiplexer which for > (E)ISA interrupt numbers calls request_isa_irq() etc. You really > should try to leave the interrupt numbers unchanged as they are; > basically every (E)ISA interrupt driver has it's numbers hardwired. That suggests that we need to renumber the levels in sgiint23.h, moving all of them up by 16 to make room for the EISA interrupts, and then increasing NR_IRQ to at least 68 from 64 to account for the extra levels. From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Tue Aug 3 01:09:10 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA09684 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 01:09:08 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id QAA22187; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:05:48 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA44358 for linux-list; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:04:20 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA52431; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:04:16 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id QAA06199; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:04:10 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-22.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.22]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA21205; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 01:04:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA30269; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 01:03:57 +0200 Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 01:03:57 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "William J. Earl" Cc: "Andrew R. Baker" , Linux SGI Subject: Re: EISA support Message-ID: <19990803010357.A29946@uni-koblenz.de> References: <19990803000615.A29290@uni-koblenz.de> <14246.8990.201459.912911@fir.engr.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <14246.8990.201459.912911@fir.engr.sgi.com>; from William J. Earl on Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 04:00:46PM -0700 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 880 Lines: 20 On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 04:00:46PM -0700, William J. Earl wrote: > Ralf Baechle writes: > ... > > The solution which we're using for other systems is to number the > > interrupts such that 0 ... 15 are the (E)ISA interrupts; all other > > system specific interrupts use higher numbers. In such a scenario > > request_irq() will essentially just be a demultiplexer which for > > (E)ISA interrupt numbers calls request_isa_irq() etc. You really > > should try to leave the interrupt numbers unchanged as they are; > > basically every (E)ISA interrupt driver has it's numbers hardwired. > > That suggests that we need to renumber the levels in sgiint23.h, > moving all of them up by 16 to make room for the EISA interrupts, and > then increasing NR_IRQ to at least 68 from 64 to account for the extra > levels. Indeed, but I don't see a problem with that. Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Tue Aug 3 01:23:44 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA10730 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 01:23:42 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id QAA05935; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:20:45 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA49476 for linux-list; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:17:47 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA72913; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:17:42 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id QAA03806; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:17:36 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-22.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.22]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA18597; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 01:17:31 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA30417; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 01:17:20 +0200 Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 01:17:20 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "William J. Earl" Cc: "Andrew R. Baker" , Linux SGI Subject: Re: EISA support Message-ID: <19990803011720.C29946@uni-koblenz.de> References: <14246.1339.269402.396117@fir.engr.sgi.com> <14246.7994.461082.434930@fir.engr.sgi.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <14246.7994.461082.434930@fir.engr.sgi.com>; from William J. Earl on Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 03:44:10PM -0700 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 915 Lines: 17 On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 03:44:10PM -0700, William J. Earl wrote: > I see that some drivers use NR_IRQS to form an IRQ_ports[] array, > to map from IRQ to board object, as in serial.c, whereas others, such as > riscom8.c, wire in 16 as the limit. Still, you could make > probe_irq_on() and probe_irq_off() actually work for an Indy and Indigo2, > and simply declare broken any drives which do not use NR_IRQS and probe > using the probe_irq_* routines. The biggest problem with that approach > is that NR_IRQS is 64 on mips, which means that probe_irq_on() and probe_irq_off() > would need a different interface (long long instead of int, to allow 64-bit > IRQ bit maps on 32-bit kernel). probe_irq_{on,off} are being used for interrupt probing only and that's an art only practiced for ISA. So we don't even want to support these functions for interupts >= 16, that is non (E)ISA interrupts. Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Mon Aug 2 20:05:18 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA23062 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 20:05:15 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id LAA19944; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 11:00:48 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id KAA92377 for linux-list; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 10:54:49 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id KAA18536 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 10:54:45 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (andrewb@uab.edu) Received: from lilith.dpo.uab.edu (lilith.dpo.uab.edu [138.26.1.128]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id KAA06547 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 10:54:41 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (andrewb@uab.edu) Received: from mdk187.tucc.uab.edu (mdk187.tucc.uab.edu [138.26.15.201]) by lilith.dpo.uab.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id MAA21375 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 12:54:40 -0500 Date: Mon, 2 Aug 1999 20:51:06 -0500 (CDT) From: "Andrew R. Baker" X-Sender: andrewb@mdk187.tucc.uab.edu To: Linux SGI Subject: EISA support Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 1376 Lines: 34 While working in EISA support for the Indigo2 I have run across some interesting design decisions and I would like to get some feedback. First is interupt handling. On the Indigo2 all the EISA interupts and mapped down to a single INT2 interrupt. In other words, an [E]ISA card generates an interrupt, which in turn, generates an INT2 interrupt, which generates a CPU interrupt. This causes a problem because current device drivers do a "request_irq" call to allocate an interrupt, on the Indy and Indigo2, this procedure allocates an INT2/3 irq. ASFAIK, this means that to be supported on the Indigo2, the device driver needs to call something else like "request_isa_irq", so that it can be allocated properly. I see two ways of implementing this. The first is easier to implement, but looks slightly grotesque and would involve lines like: #ifndef CONFIG_SGI_EISA request_irq(....); #else request_isa_irq(....); #endif the other would be to create a "request_isa_irq" procedure that defaults to "request_irq" in most architectures. Does anyone have any comments or suggestions on this? The second is a request for comments on the advantages/disadvantages of implementing EISA support as a loadable module? There is nothing in the running system that actually requires it to be available, and I think it would be neat to have bus support as a module. -Andrew From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Mon Aug 2 23:53:39 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA31075 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 23:53:37 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id OAA06865; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 14:49:28 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA52327 for linux-list; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 14:45:29 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA16983; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 14:45:22 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (andrewb@uab.edu) Received: from lilith.dpo.uab.edu (lilith.dpo.uab.edu [138.26.1.128]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id OAA05773; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 14:45:20 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (andrewb@uab.edu) Received: from mdk187.tucc.uab.edu (mdk187.tucc.uab.edu [138.26.15.201]) by lilith.dpo.uab.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA30474; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 16:45:19 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 00:41:46 -0500 (CDT) From: "Andrew R. Baker" X-Sender: andrewb@mdk187.tucc.uab.edu To: "William J. Earl" cc: Linux SGI Subject: Re: EISA support In-Reply-To: <14246.1339.269402.396117@fir.engr.sgi.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 2182 Lines: 47 On Mon, 2 Aug 1999, William J. Earl wrote: > Andrew R. Baker writes: > > > > While working in EISA support for the Indigo2 I have run across some > > interesting design decisions and I would like to get some feedback. > > > > First is interupt handling. On the Indigo2 all the EISA interupts and > > mapped down to a single INT2 interrupt. In other words, an [E]ISA card > > generates an interrupt, which in turn, generates an INT2 interrupt, which > > generates a CPU interrupt. This causes a problem because current device > > drivers do a "request_irq" call to allocate an interrupt, on the Indy and > > Indigo2, this procedure allocates an INT2/3 irq. ASFAIK, this means that > > to be supported on the Indigo2, the device driver needs to call something > > else like "request_isa_irq", so that it can be allocated properly. I see > > two ways of implementing this. The first is easier to implement, but > > looks slightly grotesque and would involve lines like: > > > > #ifndef CONFIG_SGI_EISA > > request_irq(....); > > #else > > request_isa_irq(....); > > #endif > > > > the other would be to create a "request_isa_irq" procedure that defaults > > to "request_irq" in most architectures. > > > > Does anyone have any comments or suggestions on this? > > Suppose you define a range of request_irq() index values which > correspond to EISA interrupts. The generic EISA interrupt would always > be enabled, and the selective masking would apply to various bits in the > EISA interrupt controller, in much the way that the cascading interrupts > in INT2 and INT3 are handled. I hadn't even thought about doing it that way, but after looking at the existing interupt code, it shouldn't be much of a problem. My biggest concern is maintaining compatability with the existing drivers. From what I can tell, they all grab IRQs in the range of 1-15 (the available range for EISA on x86 machines). So the best course of action is to shift the virtual IRQ numbers up to start at 16, and put the EISA irqs on the 0-15 range. Are there any major things I should consider before doing this? Are there any arguments against this? -Andrew From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Tue Aug 3 00:46:35 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA08085 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 00:46:33 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA07733; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:43:33 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA80019 for linux-list; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:21:18 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA45974 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:21:12 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (andrewb@uab.edu) Received: from lilith.dpo.uab.edu (lilith.dpo.uab.edu [138.26.1.128]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA02205 for ; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 15:21:09 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (andrewb@uab.edu) Received: from mdk187.tucc.uab.edu (mdk187.tucc.uab.edu [138.26.15.201]) by lilith.dpo.uab.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id RAA03149; Mon, 2 Aug 1999 17:20:52 -0500 Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 01:17:19 -0500 (CDT) From: "Andrew R. Baker" X-Sender: andrewb@mdk187.tucc.uab.edu Reply-To: "Andrew R. Baker" To: Ralf Baechle cc: Linux SGI Subject: Re: EISA support In-Reply-To: <19990803000615.A29290@uni-koblenz.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 834 Lines: 19 On Tue, 3 Aug 1999, Ralf Baechle wrote: > The solution which we're using for other systems is to number the > interrupts such that 0 ... 15 are the (E)ISA interrupts; all other > system specific interrupts use higher numbers. In such a scenario > request_irq() will essentially just be a demultiplexer which for > (E)ISA interrupt numbers calls request_isa_irq() etc. You really > should try to leave the interrupt numbers unchanged as they are; > basically every (E)ISA interrupt driver has it's numbers hardwired. That's basically what William Earl suggested. I am going to change the SGINT_XXX defines in sgint23.h to leave space for the (E)ISA interrupts and get change any absolute references (like in the SCSI driver) to things like "SGINT_LOCAL0 + 1". Is there anything else I should allocate some space for? -Andrew From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Wed Aug 4 00:12:33 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA00257 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 00:12:32 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id PAA16884; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 15:02:53 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA38234 for linux-list; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:56:57 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA33321 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:56:52 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id OAA05754 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 14:56:50 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-9.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.9]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA03151 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 23:56:43 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA07095; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 23:54:00 +0200 Date: Tue, 3 Aug 1999 23:54:00 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Mark Mitchell Cc: binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: PATCH for elf32-mips.c Message-ID: <19990803235400.A6637@uni-koblenz.de> References: <19990802231041C.mitchell@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <19990802231041C.mitchell@codesourcery.com>; from Mark Mitchell on Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 11:10:41PM -0700 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 602 Lines: 14 On Mon, Aug 02, 1999 at 11:10:41PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > These patches (checked in) should fix another couple of thinkos > discovered by Ralf's mips-linux-gnu testing. Ralf, just out of > curiousity, do you think that Linux/GNU will move to the N32/64-bit > ABIs at some point? Or do you plan on sticking with the IRIX5-like > ABI for the forseeable future? My binutils work is part of Linux/MIPS64, at first for the Indy, then for the Origin 200 and other 64-bit MIPS based systems. It'll be quite a while until we'll also have a 64-bit userland, but that's also one of the aims. Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Wed Aug 4 00:17:15 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA00607 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 00:17:13 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id PAA18856; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 15:13:12 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA93714 for linux-list; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 15:10:45 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA86948 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 15:10:42 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA02287 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 15:10:39 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-9.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.9]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA03810 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 00:10:37 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA07274; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 00:09:08 +0200 Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 00:09:08 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Mark Mitchell , binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: HI16 / LO16 relocations. Message-ID: <19990804000908.A7145@uni-koblenz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 502 Lines: 11 Mark, for now I'm just posting this in the hope it may ring a bell. It seems like HI16 / LO16 relocation pairs are not handled correctly This may result in ``la $reg, symbol'' ending up after the final link as ``la $reg, symbol + 0x10000''. I'll try to come up with a resonably small example tomorrow; right now I've just discovered this problem and can only show the problem in the diffs of disassembler listings between the two builds of a Linux kernel with binutils 2.8.1 and cvs-binutils. Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Wed Aug 4 01:10:21 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA10677 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 01:10:16 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id QAA29329; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 16:05:37 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA48829 for linux-list; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 16:02:22 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA24398 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 16:02:18 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id QAA04202 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 16:02:12 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-9.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.9]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA13003 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 01:02:09 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id BAA07865; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 01:01:01 +0200 Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 01:01:00 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Mark Mitchell Cc: binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: HI16 / LO16 relocations. Message-ID: <19990804010100.C7145@uni-koblenz.de> References: <19990804000908.A7145@uni-koblenz.de> <19990803154236N.mitchell@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <19990803154236N.mitchell@codesourcery.com>; from Mark Mitchell on Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 03:42:36PM -0700 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 896 Lines: 18 On Tue, Aug 03, 1999 at 03:42:36PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > As soon as you get a test-case, I'll take a look at this. It's fine > even it's big, as long as you can point at the exact place that goes > wrong; I'd really like to get this work behind me, and get everything > back to a more stable state. 've compiled *millions* of lines of code > on IRIX6 with the new linker without a problem; obviously the > relocation patterns are very different from the N32/N64 ABI to the > older ABIs. I think the core differences are probably that I tried to compile non-pic code and code which tries to use GNU extensions. I intend to recompile the entire Linux distribution with this new linker which probably will trigger a few more bugs according to my past experience. Finally the Linux/MIPS64 kernel will exercise non-PIC 64-bit code - hopefully without triggering any new bugs ... Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Wed Aug 4 06:18:57 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAA05769 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 06:18:56 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id VAA11135; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 21:12:04 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id VAA71195 for linux-list; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 21:08:22 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id VAA36089 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 21:08:19 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (greyham@research.canon.com.au) Received: from kwanon.research.canon.com.au (kwanon.research.canon.com.au [203.12.172.254]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via SMTP id VAA04337 for ; Tue, 3 Aug 1999 21:08:14 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (greyham@research.canon.com.au) Received: (qmail 1827 invoked from network); 4 Aug 1999 04:08:05 -0000 Received: from eos.research.canon.com.au (203.12.175.190) by kwanon-heat.research.canon.com.au with SMTP; 4 Aug 1999 04:08:05 -0000 Received: from elph.research.canon.com.au (elph.research.canon.com.au [203.12.174.253]) by eos.research.canon.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5323F4281; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 14:08:29 +1000 (EST) Received: by elph.research.canon.com.au (Postfix, from userid 157) id 5038A650; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 14:08:03 +1000 (EST) Subject: Anyone ported Linux to the NEC DDB-VRC4737 evaluation board? To: linux-mips@fnet.fr Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 14:08:03 +1000 (EST) Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu, debian-mips@lists.debian.org X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL25] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <19990804040803.5038A650@elph.research.canon.com.au> From: greyham@research.canon.com.au (Graham Stoney) Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 474 Lines: 12 Here's a question from way out left field, but maybe I'll get lucky today: Does anyone know of a Linux port to the NEC DDB-VRC4374 embedded evaluation board? The board is an evaluation platform for the NEC VR4300 MIPS CPU with the NEC Vrc4373 support chip, which would make a great platform for embedded Linux work with high mips/$ and the flexibility of PCI. Failing that, if it hasn't been done, can anyone offer a guess as to how hard a port might be? Regards, Graham From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Wed Aug 4 16:03:16 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA19308 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 16:03:13 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id GAA05438; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 06:58:05 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id GAA21276 for linux-list; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 06:52:55 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id GAA41779 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 06:52:51 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id GAA00460 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 06:50:25 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-17.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.17]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA16383 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 15:39:00 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA15054; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 15:38:00 +0200 Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 15:38:00 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Tseng Chou Ming , linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: howdy Message-ID: <19990804153800.A15002@uni-koblenz.de> References: <199908040808.QAA02722@idns.gv.com.tw> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <199908040808.QAA02722@idns.gv.com.tw>; from Tseng Chou Ming on Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 04:08:49PM +0800 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 481 Lines: 14 On Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 04:08:49PM +0800, Tseng Chou Ming wrote: > howdy, how can i prepare a cross-development environment > for decstation-linux on host i386-linux? > to make dynamic/static librarys > and basic applications of "/sbin" & "/bin" > like "/sbin/init" , etc.. > thx in advanced!:) Try avoiding crossc-compilation if possible ... Crosscompiler & linker binaries are available on ftp.linux.sgi.com just like all the native binaries & source you might need. Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Wed Aug 4 20:12:17 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA21832 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 20:12:15 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id LAA10505; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 11:06:40 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id LAA01492 for linux-list; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 11:02:30 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA90958 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 11:02:28 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (mikehill@hgeng.com) Received: from calvin.tor.onramp.ca (calvin.tor.onramp.ca [204.225.88.15]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via SMTP id LAA00848 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 11:02:25 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (mikehill@hgeng.com) Received: (qmail 20741 invoked from network); 4 Aug 1999 18:02:23 -0000 Received: from imail.hgeng.com (HELO bart.hgeng.com) (199.246.72.233) by mail.onramp.ca with SMTP; 4 Aug 1999 18:02:23 -0000 Received: by BART with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) id ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 14:03:21 -0400 Message-ID: From: Mike Hill To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Floptical Drive Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 14:03:18 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 1904 Lines: 44 I've connected my Indy floptical drive under Linux for the first time, and the kernel accurately detects and sizes it (when a diskette is in). Since I've never had the opportunity to actually purchase a 21 M floptical diskette, the default media are IBM format dikettes. When I try to add msdos or vfat filesystem support to the kernel (latest CVS) I get the following failure: make -C arch/mips/tools make[1]: Entering directory `/usr/src/mips/linux/arch/mips/tools' mips-linux-gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/mips/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -G 0 -mno-abicalls -fno-pic -mcpu=r4600 -mips2 -pipe -S offset.c -o offset.s sed -n '/^@@@/s///p' offset.s >offset.h cmp -s offset.h /usr/src/mips/linux/include/asm-mips/offset.h || (cp offset.h /usr/src/mips/linux/include/asm-mips/offset.h.new && mv /usr/src/mips/linux/include/asm-mips/offset.h.new /usr/src/mips/linux/include/asm-mips/offset.h) make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/mips/linux/arch/mips/tools' mips-linux-ld -static -N -G 0 -T arch/mips/ld.script.big -Ttext 0x88002000 arch/mips/kernel/head.o arch/mips/kernel/init_task.o init/main.o init/version.o \ --start-group \ arch/mips/kernel/kernel.o arch/mips/mm/mm.o kernel/kernel.o mm/mm.o fs/fs.o ipc/ipc.o \ fs/filesystems.a \ net/network.a \ drivers/block/block.a drivers/char/char.a drivers/misc/misc.a drivers/net/net.a drivers/scsi/scsi.a drivers/cdrom/cdrom.a drivers/sgi/sgi.a drivers/video/video.a \ arch/mips/lib/lib.a /usr/src/mips/linux/lib/lib.a arch/mips/sgi/kernel/sgikern.a arch/mips/arc/arclib.a \ --end-group \ -o vmlinux fs/filesystems.a(fat.o): In function `fat_file_write': file.c(.text+0x3214): undefined reference to `update_vm_cache' file.c(.text+0x3214): relocation truncated to fit: R_MIPS_26 update_vm_cache make: *** [vmlinux] Error 1 Suggestions? Thanks, Mike From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Wed Aug 4 20:43:30 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA24310 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 20:43:26 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id LAA02201; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 11:35:05 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id LAA90496 for linux-list; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 11:30:29 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA31210 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 11:29:51 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ulfc@bun.falkenberg.se) Received: from ruvild.bun.falkenberg.se (ruvild.bun.falkenberg.se [194.236.80.7]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id LAA09321 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 11:29:49 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ulfc@bun.falkenberg.se) Received: by bun.falkenberg.se via sendmail from stdin id (Debian Smail3.2.0.102) for linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 20:30:19 +0200 (CEST) Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 20:30:19 +0200 From: Ulf Carlsson To: Mike Hill Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Floptical Drive Message-ID: <19990804203018.A6702@thepuffingroup.com> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.3i In-Reply-To: ; from Mike Hill on Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 02:03:18PM -0400 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 243 Lines: 8 > When I try to add msdos or vfat filesystem support to the kernel (latest > CVS) I get the following failure: Linus broke all filesystems some time ago, this is not MIPS specific. Try the 2.2 kernel instead, I think they should be ok. Ulf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Thu Aug 5 02:28:07 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA28680 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 02:28:06 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id RAA15050; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 17:21:43 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id RAA50952 for linux-list; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 17:13:02 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id RAA00472 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 17:11:36 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id RAA07269 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 17:09:24 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-13.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.13]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA13224 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 02:09:21 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA22432; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 02:02:16 +0200 Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 02:02:16 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Mark Mitchell Cc: binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: R_MIPS_26 testcase Message-ID: <19990805020216.A22390@uni-koblenz.de> References: <19990804134926T.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <19990804230046.B15625@uni-koblenz.de> <19990804234523.A21269@uni-koblenz.de> <19990804152625A.mitchell@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <19990804152625A.mitchell@codesourcery.com>; from Mark Mitchell on Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 03:26:25PM -0700 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 559 Lines: 19 On Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 03:26:25PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > >>>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Baechle writes: > > Ralf> This seems to fix test case #6. > > >> else if (r_type == R_MIPS16_26 || r_type == R_MIPS16_26) > Ralf> ^^^^^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^^^^^ > > !#@! > > I'm going to take a nap now. When I wake up, I promise to be a saner > person. Just to make your waking sweeter, latest cvs-binutils plus the R_MIPS_26 patch from my other email plus your elflink.h patch build a working Linux kernel! Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Thu Aug 5 04:37:31 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA17021 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 04:37:30 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id TAA28161; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 19:29:57 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id TAA06621 for linux-list; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 19:25:25 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id TAA44680 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 19:23:59 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id TAA00790 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 19:21:43 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-19.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.19]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA16191 for ; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 04:21:40 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id EAA23504; Thu, 5 Aug 1999 04:19:31 +0200 Date: Thu, 5 Aug 1999 04:19:30 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Mark Mitchell Cc: binutils@sourceware.cygnus.com, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: R_MIPS_26 testcase Message-ID: <19990805041930.D22390@uni-koblenz.de> References: <19990804234523.A21269@uni-koblenz.de> <19990804152625A.mitchell@codesourcery.com> <19990805020216.A22390@uni-koblenz.de> <19990804182007L.mitchell@codesourcery.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <19990804182007L.mitchell@codesourcery.com>; from Mark Mitchell on Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 06:20:07PM -0700 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 492 Lines: 14 On Wed, Aug 04, 1999 at 06:20:07PM -0700, Mark Mitchell wrote: > >>>>> "Ralf" == Ralf Baechle writes: > > Ralf> Just to make your waking sweeter, latest cvs-binutils plus > Ralf> the R_MIPS_26 patch from my other email plus your elflink.h > Ralf> patch build a working Linux kernel! > > I must still be sleeping. I thought you said something worked. What > a nice dream I'm having ... Enjoy that feeling ... before you read my other email ... Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Wed Aug 4 22:32:35 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA06214 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 22:32:30 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id NAA06117; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 13:27:12 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA64979 for linux-list; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 13:23:09 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAB33210 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 13:23:07 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (andrewb@uab.edu) Received: from lilith.dpo.uab.edu (lilith.dpo.uab.edu [138.26.1.128]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id NAA03613 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 13:23:00 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (andrewb@uab.edu) Received: from mdk187.tucc.uab.edu (mdk187.tucc.uab.edu [138.26.15.201]) by lilith.dpo.uab.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA13856 for ; Wed, 4 Aug 1999 15:22:59 -0500 Date: Wed, 4 Aug 1999 23:19:27 -0500 (CDT) From: "Andrew R. Baker" X-Sender: andrewb@mdk187.tucc.uab.edu Reply-To: "Andrew R. Baker" To: Linux SGI Subject: Re: EISA support In-Reply-To: <19990803011720.C29946@uni-koblenz.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="445303055-1169691530-933826767=:2789" Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 7053 Lines: 124 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --445303055-1169691530-933826767=:2789 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Here is my first patch for moving around interrupts for future support of EISA. I want reassurance that I've done all of this step before I send out the code that actually moves them around. I have defined everything in the form of "SGI_XXXX_IRQ" to match the definition for the keyboard irq that used to be in sgihpc.h. These patches go against the linux_2_2 branch but should apply to the 2.3 branch as well. Let me know what you think. -Andrew --445303055-1169691530-933826767=:2789 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="indigo2.patch.1999.08.04" Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 LS0tIGxpbnV4L2luY2x1ZGUvYXNtLW1pcHMvc2dpaHBjLmgub3JpZwlXZWQg QXVnICA0IDIwOjExOjUzIDE5OTkNCisrKyBsaW51eC9pbmNsdWRlL2FzbS1t aXBzL3NnaWhwYy5oCVdlZCBBdWcgIDQgMjA6MTA6NTIgMTk5OQ0KQEAgLTMz MCw4ICszMzAsNiBAQA0KIC8qIFdlIG5lZWQgc29mdHdhcmUgY29waWVzIG9m IHRoZXNlIGJlY2F1c2UgdGhleSBhcmUgd3JpdGUgb25seS4gKi8NCiBleHRl cm4gdW5zaWduZWQgbG9uZyBzZ2lfaHBjX3dyaXRlMSwgc2dpX2hwY193cml0 ZTI7DQogDQotI2RlZmluZSBTR0lfS0VZQk9BUkRfSVJRIDIwDQotDQogc3Ry dWN0IGhwY19rZXliIHsNCiAjaWZkZWYgX19NSVBTRUJfXw0KIAl1bnNpZ25l ZCBjaGFyIF91bnVzZWQwWzNdOw0KLS0tIGxpbnV4L2luY2x1ZGUvYXNtLW1p cHMvc2dpbnQyMy5oLm9yaWcJV2VkIEF1ZyAgNCAyMDoxOToyNyAxOTk5DQor KysgbGludXgvaW5jbHVkZS9hc20tbWlwcy9zZ2ludDIzLmgJV2VkIEF1ZyAg NCAyMjo1NDozOSAxOTk5DQpAQCAtMjAsNiArMjAsMTkgQEANCiAjZGVmaW5l IFNHSU5UX0hQQ0RNQSAgIDQxICAvKiBJTkRZIGhhcyAxMSBIUENETUEgaXJx IF9zb3VyY2VzXyAqLw0KICNkZWZpbmUgU0dJTlRfRU5EICAgICAgNTIgIC8q IEVuZCBvZiAnc3BhY2VzJyAqLw0KIA0KKy8qIEluZGl2aWR1YWwgaW50ZXJy dXB0IGRlZmluaXRpb25zIGZvciB0aGUgSU5EWSBhbmQgSW5kaWdvMg0KKyAq Lw0KKw0KKyNkZWZpbmUgU0dJX1dEOTNfMF9JUlEJU0dJTlRfTE9DQUwwICsg MQkvKiAxc3Qgb25ib2FyZCBXRDkzICovDQorI2RlZmluZSBTR0lfV0Q5M18x X0lSUQlTR0lOVF9MT0NBTDAgKyAyCS8qIDJuZCBvbmJvYXJkIFdEOTMgKi8N CisjZGVmaW5lIFNHSV9FTkVUX0lSUQlTR0lOVF9MT0NBTDAgKyAzCS8qIG9u Ym9hcmQgZXRoZXJuZXQgKi8NCisNCisjZGVmaW5lIFNHSV9QQU5FTF9JUlEJ U0dJTlRfTE9DQUwxICsgMQkvKiBmcm9udCBwYW5lbCAqLw0KKw0KKyNkZWZp bmUgU0dJX0VJU0FfSVJRCVNHSU5UX0xPQ0FMMiArIDMJLyogRUlTQSBpbnRl cnJ1cHRzICovDQorI2RlZmluZSBTR0lfS0VZQk9BUkRfSVJRCVNHSU5UX0xP Q0FMMiArIDQJLyoga2V5Ym9hcmQgKi8NCisjZGVmaW5lIFNHSV9TRVJJQUxf SVJRCVNHSU5UX0xPQ0FMMiArIDUJLyogb25ib2FyZCBzZXJpYWwgKi8NCisN CiAvKiBJTlQyIG9jY3VwaWVzIEhQQyBQQlVTIHNsb3QgNCwgSU5UMyB1c2Vz IHNsb3QgNi4gKi8NCiAjZGVmaW5lIFNHSV9JTlQyX0JBU0UgMHgxZmJkOTAw MCAvKiBwaHlzaWNhbCAqLw0KICNkZWZpbmUgU0dJX0lOVDNfQkFTRSAweDFm YmQ5ODgwIC8qIHBoeXNpY2FsICovDQotLS0gbGludXgvZHJpdmVycy9uZXQv c2dpc2VlcS5jLm9yaWcJV2VkIEF1ZyAgNCAyMjoyODo0NiAxOTk5DQorKysg bGludXgvZHJpdmVycy9uZXQvc2dpc2VlcS5jCVdlZCBBdWcgIDQgMjE6NTk6 MTUgMTk5OQ0KQEAgLTczOCw1ICs3MzgsNSBAQA0KIAlzdHIyZWFkZHIob25i b2FyZF9ldGhfYWRkciwgZXApOw0KIAlyZXR1cm4gc2dpc2VlcV9pbml0KGRl diwNCiAJCQkgICAgKHN0cnVjdCBzZ2lzZWVxX3JlZ3MgKikgKEtTRUcxQURE UigweDFmYmQ0MDAwKSksDQotCQkJICAgICZocGMzYzAtPmV0aHJlZ3MsIDMp Ow0KKwkJCSAgICAmaHBjM2MwLT5ldGhyZWdzLCBTR0lfRU5FVF9JUlEpOw0K IH0NCi0tLSBsaW51eC9kcml2ZXJzL3Njc2kvc2dpd2Q5My5jLm9yaWcJV2Vk IEF1ZyAgNCAyMTo1OTo1MSAxOTk5DQorKysgbGludXgvZHJpdmVycy9zY3Np L3NnaXdkOTMuYwlXZWQgQXVnICA0IDIyOjAyOjIyIDE5OTkNCkBAIC0yODEs NyArMjgxLDcgQEANCiANCiAJc2dpd2Q5M19ob3N0ID0gc2NzaV9yZWdpc3Rl cihIUHNVWCwgc2l6ZW9mKHN0cnVjdCBXRDMzQzkzX2hvc3RkYXRhKSk7DQog CXNnaXdkOTNfaG9zdC0+YmFzZSA9ICh1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyICopIGhyZWdz Ow0KLQlzZ2l3ZDkzX2hvc3QtPmlycSA9IDE7DQorCXNnaXdkOTNfaG9zdC0+ aXJxID0gU0dJX1dEOTNfMF9JUlE7DQogDQogCWJ1ZiA9ICh1Y2hhciAqKSBn ZXRfZnJlZV9wYWdlKEdGUF9LRVJORUwpOw0KIAlpbml0X2hwY19jaGFpbihi dWYpOw0KQEAgLTI5NSwxMiArMjk1LDEyIEBADQogCWhkYXRhLT5kbWFfYm91 bmNlX2J1ZmZlciA9ICh1Y2hhciAqKSAoS1NFRzFBRERSKGJ1ZikpOw0KIAlk bWFfY2FjaGVfd2JhY2tfaW52KCh1bnNpZ25lZCBsb25nKSBidWYsIFBBR0Vf U0laRSk7DQogDQotCXJlcXVlc3RfaXJxKDEsIHNnaXdkOTNfaW50ciwgMCwg IlNHSSBXRDkzIiwgKHZvaWQgKikgc2dpd2Q5M19ob3N0KTsNCisJcmVxdWVz dF9pcnEoU0dJX1dEOTNfMF9JUlEsIHNnaXdkOTNfaW50ciwgMCwgIlNHSSBX RDkzIiwgKHZvaWQgKikgc2dpd2Q5M19ob3N0KTsNCiAgICAgICAgIC8qIHNl dCB1cCBzZWNvbmQgY29udHJvbGxlciBvbiB0aGUgSW5kaWdvMiAqLw0KIAlp Zighc2dpX2d1aW5lc3MpIHsNCiAJCXNnaXdkOTNfaG9zdDEgPSBzY3NpX3Jl Z2lzdGVyKEhQc1VYLCBzaXplb2Yoc3RydWN0IFdEMzNDOTNfaG9zdGRhdGEp KTsNCiAJCXNnaXdkOTNfaG9zdDEtPmJhc2UgPSAodW5zaWduZWQgY2hhciAq KSBocmVnczE7DQotCQlzZ2l3ZDkzX2hvc3QxLT5pcnEgPSAyOw0KKwkJc2dp d2Q5M19ob3N0MS0+aXJxID0gU0dJX1dEOTNfMV9JUlE7DQogDQogCQlidWYg PSAodWNoYXIgKikgZ2V0X2ZyZWVfcGFnZShHRlBfS0VSTkVMKTsNCiAJCWlu aXRfaHBjX2NoYWluKGJ1Zik7DQpAQCAtMzE0LDcgKzMxNCw3IEBADQogCQlo ZGF0YTEtPmRtYV9ib3VuY2VfYnVmZmVyID0gKHVjaGFyICopIChLU0VHMUFE RFIoYnVmKSk7DQogCQlkbWFfY2FjaGVfd2JhY2tfaW52KCh1bnNpZ25lZCBs b25nKSBidWYsIFBBR0VfU0laRSk7DQogDQotCQlyZXF1ZXN0X2lycSgyLCBz Z2l3ZDkzX2ludHIsIDAsICJTR0kgV0Q5MyIsICh2b2lkICopIHNnaXdkOTNf aG9zdDEpOw0KKwkJcmVxdWVzdF9pcnEoU0dJX1dEOTNfMV9JUlEsIHNnaXdk OTNfaW50ciwgMCwgIlNHSSBXRDkzIiwgKHZvaWQgKikgc2dpd2Q5M19ob3N0 MSk7DQogCX0NCiAJDQogCWNhbGxlZCA9IDE7DQpAQCAtMzM3LDkgKzMzNywx NCBAQA0KIGludCBzZ2l3ZDkzX3JlbGVhc2Uoc3RydWN0IFNjc2lfSG9zdCAq aW5zdGFuY2UpDQogew0KICNpZmRlZiBNT0RVTEUNCi0JZnJlZV9pcnEoMSwg c2dpd2Q5M19pbnRyKTsNCisJZnJlZV9pcnEoU0dJX1dEOTNfMF9JUlEsIHNn aXdkOTNfaW50cik7DQogCWZyZWVfcGFnZShLU0VHMEFERFIoaGRhdGEtPmRt YV9ib3VuY2VfYnVmZmVyKSk7DQogCXdkMzNjOTNfcmVsZWFzZSgpOw0KKwlp ZiAoIXNnaV9ndWluZXNzKSB7DQorCQlmcmVlX2lycShTR0lfV0Q5M18xX0lS USwgc2dpd2Q5M19pbnRyKTsNCisJCWZyZWVfcGFnZShLU0VHMEFERFIoaGRh dGExLT5kbWFfYm91bmNlX2J1ZmZlcikpOw0KKwkJd2QzM2M5M19yZWxlYXNl KCk7DQorCX0NCiAjZW5kaWYNCiAJcmV0dXJuIDE7DQogfQ0KLS0tIGxpbnV4 L2FyY2gvbWlwcy9zZ2kva2VybmVsL3Jlc2V0LmMub3JpZwlXZWQgQXVnICA0 IDIyOjUyOjU5IDE5OTkNCisrKyBsaW51eC9hcmNoL21pcHMvc2dpL2tlcm5l bC9yZXNldC5jCVdlZCBBdWcgIDQgMjE6NDU6NTkgMTk5OQ0KQEAgLTEwOCw3 ICsxMDgsNyBAQA0KIAlpZiAoaGFzX3BhbmljZWQpDQogCQlwcm9tX3JlYm9v dCgpOw0KIA0KLQllbmFibGVfaXJxKDkpOw0KKwllbmFibGVfaXJxKFNHSV9Q QU5FTF9JUlEpOw0KIH0NCiANCiBzdGF0aWMgaW5saW5lIHZvaWQgcG93ZXJf YnV0dG9uKHZvaWQpDQpAQCAtMTg1LDcgKzE4NSw3IEBADQogCWhwYzNtcmVn cy0+cGFuZWwgPSAzOyAvKiBwb3dlcl9pbnRlcnJ1cHQgfCBwb3dlcl9zdXBw bHlfb24gKi8NCiANCiAJaWYgKGlvY19pY29udHJvbC0+aXN0YXQxICYgMikg eyAvKiBXYWl0IHVudGlsIGludGVycnVwdCBnb2VzIGF3YXkgKi8NCi0JCWRp c2FibGVfaXJxKDkpOw0KKwkJZGlzYWJsZV9pcnEoU0dJX1BBTkVMX0lSUSk7 DQogCQlpbml0X3RpbWVyKCZkZWJvdW5jZV90aW1lcik7DQogCQlkZWJvdW5j ZV90aW1lci5mdW5jdGlvbiA9IGRlYm91bmNlOw0KIAkJZGVib3VuY2VfdGlt ZXIuZXhwaXJlcyA9IGppZmZpZXMgKyA1Ow0KQEAgLTIzOSw3ICsyMzksNyBA QA0KIAlfbWFjaGluZV9oYWx0ID0gc2dpX21hY2hpbmVfaGFsdDsNCiAJX21h Y2hpbmVfcG93ZXJfb2ZmID0gc2dpX21hY2hpbmVfcG93ZXJfb2ZmOw0KIA0K LQlyZXF1ZXN0X2lycSg5LCBwYW5lbF9pbnQsIDAsICJGcm9udCBQYW5lbCIs IE5VTEwpOw0KKwlyZXF1ZXN0X2lycShTR0lfUEFORUxfSVJRLCBwYW5lbF9p bnQsIDAsICJGcm9udCBQYW5lbCIsIE5VTEwpOw0KIAlpbml0X3RpbWVyKCZi bGlua190aW1lcik7DQogCWJsaW5rX3RpbWVyLmZ1bmN0aW9uID0gYmxpbmtf dGltZW91dDsNCiAJbm90aWZpZXJfY2hhaW5fcmVnaXN0ZXIoJnBhbmljX25v dGlmaWVyX2xpc3QsICZwYW5pY19ibG9jayk7DQo= --445303055-1169691530-933826767=:2789-- From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Fri Aug 6 22:53:52 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA12913 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 22:53:42 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id NAA02525; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 13:36:59 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA26270 for linux-list; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 13:29:47 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA29019 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 13:29:42 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (mikehill@hgeng.com) Received: from calvin.tor.onramp.ca (calvin.tor.onramp.ca [204.225.88.15]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via SMTP id NAA05037 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 13:29:38 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (mikehill@hgeng.com) Received: (qmail 30734 invoked from network); 6 Aug 1999 20:29:36 -0000 Received: from imail.hgeng.com (HELO bart.hgeng.com) (199.246.72.233) by mail.onramp.ca with SMTP; 6 Aug 1999 20:29:36 -0000 Received: by BART with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) id ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 16:30:28 -0400 Message-ID: From: Mike Hill To: "'Ulf Carlsson'" Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: RE: Floptical Drive Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 16:30:25 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 1303 Lines: 34 Same problem with 2.2, just a different error: make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/mips/linux/drivers/net' mips-linux-gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/mips/linux/include -Wall -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -G 0 -mno-abicalls -fno-pic -mcpu=r4600 -mips2 -pipe -c -o sgiseeq.o sgiseeq.c sgiseeq.c: In function `sgiseeq_probe': sgiseeq.c:741: `SGI_ENET_IRQ' undeclared (first use this function) sgiseeq.c:741: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once sgiseeq.c:741: for each function it appears in.) make[3]: *** [sgiseeq.o] Error 1 make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/mips/linux/drivers/net' make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/mips/linux/drivers/net' make[1]: *** [_subdir_net] Error 2 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/mips/linux/drivers' make: *** [_dir_drivers] Error 2 > -----Original Message----- > From: Ulf Carlsson [SMTP:ulfc@thepuffingroup.com] > Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 1999 2:30 PM > To: Mike Hill > Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com > Subject: Re: Floptical Drive > > > When I try to add msdos or vfat filesystem support to the kernel (latest > > CVS) I get the following failure: > > Linus broke all filesystems some time ago, this is not MIPS specific. > > Try the 2.2 kernel instead, I think they should be ok. > > Ulf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Fri Aug 6 23:10:08 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA14248 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 23:10:05 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id OAA19142; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 14:03:11 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA28671 for linux-list; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 13:56:24 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from hollywood.engr.sgi.com (hollywood.engr.sgi.com [150.166.61.38]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id NAA36689 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 13:56:22 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@hollywood.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from fisher@localhost) by hollywood.engr.sgi.com (940816.SGI.8.6.9/960327.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA10977; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 13:56:21 -0700 From: fisher@hollywood.engr.sgi.com (William Fisher) Message-Id: <199908062056.NAA10977@hollywood.engr.sgi.com> Subject: Re: Status update for new features for slinx and SGI Linux 1.1 needed To: wje@fir.engr.sgi.com (William J. Earl) Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 13:56:17 -0800 (PDT) Cc: wombat@kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com, sp@albion.engr.sgi.com, slinx@albion.engr.sgi.com, linux@hollywood.engr.sgi.com, fisher@hollywood.engr.sgi.com (William Fisher) In-Reply-To: <14251.18809.661631.345106@fir.engr.sgi.com> from "William J. Earl" at Aug 6, 99 01:45:45 pm Reply-To: fisher@sgi.com X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL3] Content-Type: text Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 576 Lines: 19 > > Joan Eslinger writes: > > Two more things not specifically on your list, but that are traditionally > > included in RedHat kernels (and went in 1.0): > > > > pcmcia > > ibcs > > > > I have these in my drivers tree. > > Are these not part of the base Linux release from Linus? If not, > I will add them to the list. > Reading the kernel mailing list, there was a LONG series of messages on the "infrastructure" support for pcmcia cards between some Stanford-ites and Linus. Hence it wasn't clear what was going to get checked into the tree. -- Bill From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Fri Aug 6 17:03:52 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA15114 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 17:03:43 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id HAA14192; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 07:59:04 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id HAA13453 for linux-list; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 07:51:32 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id HAA16121 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 07:51:25 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (andrewb@uab.edu) Received: from lilith.dpo.uab.edu (lilith.dpo.uab.edu [138.26.1.128]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id HAA06907 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 07:51:22 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (andrewb@uab.edu) Received: from mdk187.tucc.uab.edu (mdk187.tucc.uab.edu [138.26.15.201]) by lilith.dpo.uab.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA20258 for ; Fri, 6 Aug 1999 09:51:20 -0500 Date: Fri, 6 Aug 1999 17:47:51 -0500 (CDT) From: "Andrew R. Baker" X-Sender: andrewb@mdk187.tucc.uab.edu To: Linux SGI Subject: problems compiling 2.3 cvs kernel Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 445 Lines: 11 I am getting consistent signal 11 errors while trying to compile the 2.3 tree from the CVS archives with gcc-2.7.2. They always occur on the same files and in both my normal cross-compile enviroment and in the native Linux-MIPS enviroment. egcs seems to work fine in the native enviroment. Do I just need to upgrade my cross-compiler setup? Is there a tarball I can install instead of fussing with the RPMs on the web site? Thanks, Andrew From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sun Aug 8 00:31:14 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA17685 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 00:31:13 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id PAA01649; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 15:15:51 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA91533 for linux-list; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 15:02:16 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA85800 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 15:02:11 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1] (may be forged)) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA02206 for ; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 15:02:09 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-24.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.24]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA27519 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 00:02:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA03620; Sat, 7 Aug 1999 23:59:29 +0200 Date: Sat, 7 Aug 1999 23:59:29 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Andrew R. Baker" Cc: Linux SGI Subject: Re: problems compiling 2.3 cvs kernel Message-ID: <19990807235929.A3565@uni-koblenz.de> References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: ; from Andrew R. Baker on Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 05:47:51PM -0500 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 1188 Lines: 31 On Fri, Aug 06, 1999 at 05:47:51PM -0500, Andrew R. Baker wrote: > I am getting consistent signal 11 errors while trying to compile the 2.3 > tree from the CVS archives with gcc-2.7.2. They always occur on the same > files and in both my normal cross-compile enviroment and in the native > Linux-MIPS enviroment. cc1 of gcc 2.7.x is known to die on a number of C constructs like bfd_link_section_stabs (void) { unsigned long long i, count; for (i = 0; i < count; i++); } when optimizing. This a compiler that was written even before the invention of slived bread, so I don't care :-) > egcs seems to work fine in the native enviroment. > Do I just need to upgrade my cross-compiler setup? Is there a tarball I > can install instead of fussing with the RPMs on the web site? There are binary crosscompiler rpms and native compilers for a number of hosts online. If you don't like using rpm, then you can still use rpm2cpio and cpio to just extract the files from an rpm archive for your favourite architecture. Right now we've got binaries for Linux/{Alpha,sparc,i386,ppc} online and I'll upload IRIX binaries rsn. I just want to lobotomize binutils before that :-) Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sun Aug 8 15:03:29 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA08036 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 15:03:27 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id GAA05997; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 06:00:25 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id FAA66749 for linux-list; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 05:33:31 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id FAA66132; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 05:33:28 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (sccsmith@concentric.net) Received: from uhura.concentric.net (uhura.concentric.net [206.173.118.93]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id FAA05388; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 05:33:27 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (sccsmith@concentric.net) Received: from cliff.concentric.net (cliff [206.173.118.90]) by uhura.concentric.net (8.9.1a/(98/12/15 5.12)) id IAA24395; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 08:30:13 -0400 (EDT) [1-800-745-2747 The Concentric Network] Received: from Jennifer (ts002d13.stl-mo.concentric.net [206.173.152.73]) by cliff.concentric.net (8.9.1a) id IAA03673; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 08:29:46 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <004701bee19a$34f46e40$6501a8c0@Jennifer.cncx.com> From: "Steven Smith" To: "Linux SGI" Subject: Configuring 2nd Drive Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 07:33:18 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0044_01BEE170.48F11B20" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 3032 Lines: 81 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0044_01BEE170.48F11B20 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Configure your disks With IRIX tools, create an EFS partition on your Linux disk. Use command = fx to do that. I recommend that you create the default "root" layout on = the disk (provided you have the whole second disk for Linux). At this = point, a swap partition won't be recognized. Yes, we're working on it. = The installer does include fdisk, although it is untested.=20 I have used fx to create to root layout on my second drive, but when I = use disk manager to try and make the EFS file system, Disk manager = changes my partition back to a user partition. I can get linux to = install doing that but linux cannot mount drive on reboot. Questions : 1. How do I get mkfs_efs to work using xterm window? 2. Where is there more information about configuring 2nd drive? I have = read the web page about the mini-HOWTO, but I don't have a CDROM drive = and my screen doesn't have the menu's that is referred to in the HOWTO. Thanks, Steven ------=_NextPart_000_0044_01BEE170.48F11B20 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Configure your disks

With IRIX tools, create an EFS partition on = your=20 Linux disk. Use command fx to do that. I recommend that you = create the=20 default "root" layout on the disk (provided you have the whole = second=20 disk for Linux). At this point, a swap partition won't be recognized. = Yes, we're=20 working on it. The installer does include fdisk, although it is = untested.
 
 
I have used fx to create to root = layout on my=20 second drive, but when I use disk manager to try and make the EFS file = system,=20 Disk manager changes my partition back to a user partition. I can get = linux to=20 install doing that but linux cannot mount drive on reboot. Questions=20 :
 
1. How do I get mkfs_efs to work = using xterm=20 window?
2. Where is there more information = about=20 configuring 2nd drive? I have read the web page about the mini-HOWTO, = but I=20 don't have a CDROM drive and my screen doesn't have the menu's that is = referred=20 to in the HOWTO.
 
 
Thanks,
Steven
------=_NextPart_000_0044_01BEE170.48F11B20-- From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sun Aug 8 17:04:21 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA28692 for ; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 17:04:18 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id IAA03173; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 08:00:15 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id HAA81528 for linux-list; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 07:07:05 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id HAA86378; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 07:07:01 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (sccsmith@concentric.net) Received: from uhura.concentric.net (uhura.concentric.net [206.173.118.93]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id HAA00432; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 07:06:54 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (sccsmith@concentric.net) Received: from cliff.concentric.net (cliff [206.173.118.90]) by uhura.concentric.net (8.9.1a/(98/12/15 5.12)) id KAA00624; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 10:03:40 -0400 (EDT) [1-800-745-2747 The Concentric Network] Received: from Jennifer (ts004d21.stl-mo.concentric.net [206.173.152.177]) by cliff.concentric.net (8.9.1a) id KAA15546; Sun, 8 Aug 1999 10:03:16 -0400 (EDT) Message-ID: <009501bee1a7$43215ac0$6501a8c0@Jennifer.cncx.com> From: "Steven Smith" To: "Steven Smith" , "Linux SGI" Subject: Re: Configuring 2nd Drive Date: Sun, 8 Aug 1999 09:06:44 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0092_01BEE17D.5643D440" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 4.72.3110.1 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 4239 Lines: 114 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0092_01BEE17D.5643D440 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Problem corrected...... I'm up now. Thanks to those who would have = replied. -----Original Message----- From: Steven Smith To: Linux SGI Date: Sunday, August 08, 1999 8:02 AM Subject: Configuring 2nd Drive =20 =20 Configure your disks With IRIX tools, create an EFS partition on your Linux disk. Use = command fx to do that. I recommend that you create the default "root" = layout on the disk (provided you have the whole second disk for Linux). = At this point, a swap partition won't be recognized. Yes, we're working = on it. The installer does include fdisk, although it is untested.=20 =20 =20 I have used fx to create to root layout on my second drive, but when = I use disk manager to try and make the EFS file system, Disk manager = changes my partition back to a user partition. I can get linux to = install doing that but linux cannot mount drive on reboot. Questions : =20 1. How do I get mkfs_efs to work using xterm window? 2. Where is there more information about configuring 2nd drive? I = have read the web page about the mini-HOWTO, but I don't have a CDROM = drive and my screen doesn't have the menu's that is referred to in the = HOWTO. =20 =20 Thanks, Steven ------=_NextPart_000_0092_01BEE17D.5643D440 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Problem corrected...... I'm up now. = Thanks to=20 those who would have replied.
-----Original = Message-----
From:=20 Steven Smith <sccsmith@concentric.net>To:=20 Linux SGI <linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com= >
Date:=20 Sunday, August 08, 1999 8:02 AM
Subject: Configuring = 2nd=20 Drive

Configure your disks

With IRIX tools, create an EFS = partition on=20 your Linux disk. Use command fx to do that. I recommend = that you=20 create the default "root" layout on the disk (provided you = have=20 the whole second disk for Linux). At this point, a swap partition = won't be=20 recognized. Yes, we're working on it. The installer does include = fdisk,=20 although it is untested.
 
 
I have used fx to create to root = layout on=20 my second drive, but when I use disk manager to try and make the EFS = file=20 system, Disk manager changes my partition back to a user partition. = I can=20 get linux to install doing that but linux cannot mount drive on = reboot.=20 Questions :
 
1. How do I get mkfs_efs to work = using xterm=20 window?
2. Where is there more = information about=20 configuring 2nd drive? I have read the web page about the = mini-HOWTO, but I=20 don't have a CDROM drive and my screen doesn't have the menu's that = is=20 referred to in the HOWTO.
 
 
Thanks,
Steven
------=_NextPart_000_0092_01BEE17D.5643D440-- From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Mon Aug 9 23:02:10 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA09751 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 23:01:52 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id NAA05152; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 13:55:09 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA59028 for linux-list; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 13:45:08 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA60477 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 13:45:04 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id NAA04625 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 13:45:01 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-29.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.29]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA16935 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 22:44:52 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA17414; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 14:40:51 +0200 Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 14:40:50 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Cc: thockin@cobaltnet.com Subject: binutils: Heads up! Message-ID: <19990809144050.A17349@uni-koblenz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 1728 Lines: 50 Over the last couple of days I've been working on bashing all bugs out of current CVS binutils from Cygnus. The result is that as of yesterday my working version is probably better then ever. The downside: one of the bugs, misstreating R_MIPS_32 relocations was present in all previous versions of binutils. Here the details for those who care: Assume two source file, the first one: .data .globl var var: .word external_reference Using binutils 2.8.1 the assembler outputs the following relocation record: RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.data]: OFFSET TYPE VALUE 0000000000000000 R_MIPS_32 external_reference That's the correct behaviour. So, now make that a reference to a global variable defined in the same source: .data .globl var var: .word other .globl other other: .word 42 This time the assembler will emit: RELOCATION RECORDS FOR [.data]: OFFSET TYPE VALUE 0000000000000000 R_MIPS_32 .data This relocation should be against other. Why is this a problem? Assume both files would be referencing the same global variable. They get linked together as part of a final program / library. Then at runtime the linker will resolve the one reference to the local instance of the variable and possibly to another instance for the other reference. This problem may sound rather theoretical. Well, it isn't. Lots of software out there does nasties like ``int errno = 0;''. So once we're finished with fixing binutils every single binary should be recompiled and eventually exchanged in order to finally get rid of it's effect. It's probably only causing actual problems in a very small number of binaries but I though I should mention it. Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Mon Aug 9 15:41:53 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA01145 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 15:41:37 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id GAA19829; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 06:36:15 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id GAA40476 for linux-list; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 06:28:02 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id GAA08111 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 06:27:57 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (andrewb@uab.edu) Received: from lilith.dpo.uab.edu (lilith.dpo.uab.edu [138.26.1.128]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id GAA04718 for ; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 06:27:56 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (andrewb@uab.edu) Received: from mdk187.tucc.uab.edu (mdk187.tucc.uab.edu [138.26.15.201]) by lilith.dpo.uab.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id IAA06914; Mon, 9 Aug 1999 08:27:46 -0500 Date: Mon, 9 Aug 1999 16:24:19 -0500 (CDT) From: "Andrew R. Baker" X-Sender: andrewb@mdk187.tucc.uab.edu Reply-To: "Andrew R. Baker" To: Mike Hill cc: "'Ulf Carlsson'" , linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: RE: Floptical Drive In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 1753 Lines: 54 This patch should fix the error you are seing below, but probably won't do much for your original complaint. --- sgiseeq.c~ Fri Aug 6 08:25:29 1999 +++ sgiseeq.c Mon Aug 9 16:18:16 1999 @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ #include #include +#include #include #include "sgiseeq.h" On Fri, 6 Aug 1999, Mike Hill wrote: > Same problem with 2.2, just a different error: > > make[3]: Entering directory `/usr/src/mips/linux/drivers/net' > mips-linux-gcc -D__KERNEL__ -I/usr/src/mips/linux/include -Wall > -Wstrict-prototypes -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -G 0 -mno-abicalls -fno-pic > -mcpu=r4600 -mips2 -pipe -c -o sgiseeq.o sgiseeq.c > sgiseeq.c: In function `sgiseeq_probe': > sgiseeq.c:741: `SGI_ENET_IRQ' undeclared (first use this function) > sgiseeq.c:741: (Each undeclared identifier is reported only once > sgiseeq.c:741: for each function it appears in.) > make[3]: *** [sgiseeq.o] Error 1 > make[3]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/mips/linux/drivers/net' > make[2]: *** [first_rule] Error 2 > make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/mips/linux/drivers/net' > make[1]: *** [_subdir_net] Error 2 > make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/mips/linux/drivers' > make: *** [_dir_drivers] Error 2 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Ulf Carlsson [SMTP:ulfc@thepuffingroup.com] > > Sent: Wednesday, August 04, 1999 2:30 PM > > To: Mike Hill > > Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com > > Subject: Re: Floptical Drive > > > > > When I try to add msdos or vfat filesystem support to the kernel (latest > > > CVS) I get the following failure: > > > > Linus broke all filesystems some time ago, this is not MIPS specific. > > > > Try the 2.2 kernel instead, I think they should be ok. > > > > Ulf > From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Wed Aug 11 17:21:55 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id RAA15299 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 17:21:53 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id IAA07695; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:18:20 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id IAA18584 for linux-list; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:09:58 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id IAA22528 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:09:52 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (mikehill@hgeng.com) Received: from calvin.tor.onramp.ca (calvin.tor.onramp.ca [204.225.88.15]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via SMTP id IAA07432 for ; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 08:09:46 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (mikehill@hgeng.com) Received: (qmail 2710 invoked from network); 11 Aug 1999 15:09:42 -0000 Received: from imail.hgeng.com (HELO bart.hgeng.com) (199.246.72.233) by mail.onramp.ca with SMTP; 11 Aug 1999 15:09:42 -0000 Received: by BART with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) id ; Wed, 11 Aug 1999 10:53:29 -0400 Message-ID: From: Mike Hill To: "'Andrew R. Baker'" Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: RE: Floptical Drive Date: Wed, 11 Aug 1999 10:53:26 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 625 Lines: 27 Thanks Andrew, 2.2 compiles now. Mike > -----Original Message----- > From: Andrew R. Baker [SMTP:andrewb@uab.edu] > Sent: Monday, August 09, 1999 5:24 PM > To: Mike Hill > Cc: 'Ulf Carlsson'; linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com > Subject: RE: Floptical Drive > > > This patch should fix the error you are seing below, but probably won't do > much for your original complaint. > > --- sgiseeq.c~ Fri Aug 6 08:25:29 1999 > +++ sgiseeq.c Mon Aug 9 16:18:16 1999 > @@ -32,6 +32,7 @@ > #include > > #include > +#include > #include > > #include "sgiseeq.h" > From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Thu Aug 12 23:52:53 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA17861 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 23:52:50 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id OAA03974; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 14:49:26 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA08410 for linux-list; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 14:34:15 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA08694 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 14:34:08 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (andrewb@uab.edu) Received: from lilith.dpo.uab.edu (lilith.dpo.uab.edu [138.26.1.128]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id OAA00807 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 14:34:06 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (andrewb@uab.edu) Received: from mdk187.tucc.uab.edu (mdk187.tucc.uab.edu [138.26.15.201]) by lilith.dpo.uab.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA12394 for ; Thu, 12 Aug 1999 16:34:04 -0500 Date: Thu, 12 Aug 1999 16:34:10 -0500 (CDT) From: "Andrew R. Baker" X-Sender: andrewb@mdk187.tucc.uab.edu To: Linux SGI Subject: Does the (E)ISA bus allow shared interupts? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 236 Lines: 9 I am looking at whether I should use the interrupt handling in arch/mips/kernel/irq.c for the i8259 or the stuff in arch/mips/sgi/kernel/indy_int.c for local interrupts as a basis in doing the EISA interrupt handling. Thanks, Andrew From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sun Aug 15 21:09:00 1999 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA08363 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 21:08:52 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id MAA06703; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 12:06:18 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id LAA19652 for linux-list; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 11:57:33 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id LAA25251 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 11:57:31 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (cory@real-time.com) Received: from paladin.real-time.com (paladin.real-time.com [206.10.252.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id LAA08654 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 11:57:29 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (cory@real-time.com) Received: from real-time.com (atm-bvi1-202.real-time.com [206.147.104.202]) by paladin.real-time.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id NAA28578 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 13:57:28 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <37B70CDF.D938EA0D@real-time.com> Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1999 13:54:24 -0500 From: Cory Jon Hollingsworth X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.9 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Hard Hat and Tandem. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 2374 Lines: 61 I have a Tandem model number CMN B006S that I'm trying to get Hard Hat up and running on. This is a machine build for Tandem by SGI and, based on the descriptions I have read, I believe it is a close cousin to the Challenge S. For instance an hinv returns: Syestem: IP22 Processor: 150 Mhz R4400, with FPU Primary I-cache size: 16 Kbytes Primary D-cache size: 16 Kbytes Secondary cache size: 1024 Kbytes Memory size: 256 Mbytes SCSI Disk: scsi(0)disk(1) When I try to boot off of the 2.1.100 kernel distributed with Hard Hat I get this: wd33c93-0: chip=WD33c93B/13 no_sync=0xff no_dma=0scsi0 : SGI WD 93 scsi : 1 host. sending SDTR 0103013f0csync_xfer=2c Vendor: SGI Model: SEAGATE ST31230N2 Type: Direct-Access ANSI SCSI revision: 02 Detected scsi disk sda at scsi0, channel 0, id 1, lun 0 scsi : detected 1 SCSI disk total. SCSI device sda: hdwr sector= 512 bytes. Sectors= 2070235 [1010 MB] [1.0 GB] sgiseeq.c: David S Miller (dm@engr.sgi.com) eth0: SGI Seeq8003 08:00:69:08:db:dd Sending BOOTP requests....Got a bus error IRQ, shouldn't happen yet $0 : 00000000 88190000 97f8bd68 fffffff5 $4 : 97f8db84 00000000 00000000 00000040 $8 : 0000001c 881095b4 00000001 00000000 $12: 00000000 97f8476c 97f84600 a8617000 $16: 00000040 97f43f78 00000000 97f8bdb0 $20: 0000016c 9fc56934 00000000 9fc56394 $24: 00000000 97f8bce8 $28: 97f8a000 97f8bd50 9fc4be88 880923cc epc : 880923cc Status: 1004fc03 Cause : 00004000 Spinning... Now I have spent a some time browsing the archives and I know this was a common problem some time ago on certain models of Indys. I can get the system to boot by replacing the Hard Hat vmlinux image with the vmlinux-indy-initrd-990313.gz image found in ftp.linux.sgi.com/pub/linux/mips/test. But that leaves me with a crippled RAM disk image and a root prompt. I can NFS mount my Hard Hat file system, but that doesn't help me run the installation. My question is: Can I get a precompiled vmlinux replacement for the Hard Hat distribution which will allow me to continue with the installation? Or, since Tandem is not officially supported, do I spend the next couple of months hand assembling a root partition on the machine from the bits I currently have working via NFS? Any advice anyone could give me would be greatly appreciated. Thanks. From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Mon Aug 16 00:40:59 1999 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA14841 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 00:40:57 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id PAA01489; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 15:39:04 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA66600 for linux-list; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 15:31:21 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA19739 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 15:30:56 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1] (may be forged)) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA05593 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 15:30:53 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-15.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.15]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA27073 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 00:30:50 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA12353; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 23:56:34 +0200 Date: Sun, 15 Aug 1999 23:56:34 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Binutils, once more ... Message-ID: <19990815235634.A12336@uni-koblenz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 588 Lines: 13 Another binutils status report - as of now I still have two open bugs: - ld doesn't fill the .got entries for non-dynamic binaries. - binutils-current are so extremly wastefull with .got space that we run out of got space for building relativly simple programs like vim. There is a workaround for this problem which is using compiling things with the -Wa,-xgot option. Not really a good idea because it requires recompilation of several packages with that option but at least it works ... Btw, binutils 2.8.1 died the SIGSEGV death when trying to link vim ... Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Mon Aug 16 02:24:18 1999 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA02329 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 02:24:17 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id RAA00279; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 17:22:52 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id RAA95424 for linux-list; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 17:16:56 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id RAA08508 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 17:16:52 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1] (may be forged)) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id RAA07040 for ; Sun, 15 Aug 1999 17:16:50 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-15.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.15]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA27436 for ; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 02:16:47 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id CAA13803; Mon, 16 Aug 1999 02:16:33 +0200 Date: Mon, 16 Aug 1999 02:16:33 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: Binutils, once more ... Message-ID: <19990816021633.A13756@uni-koblenz.de> References: <19990815235634.A12336@uni-koblenz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <19990815235634.A12336@uni-koblenz.de>; from Ralf Baechle on Sun, Aug 15, 1999 at 11:56:34PM +0200 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 751 Lines: 19 On Sun, Aug 15, 1999 at 11:56:34PM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > Another binutils status report - as of now I still have two open bugs: > > - ld doesn't fill the .got entries for non-dynamic binaries. > - binutils-current are so extremly wastefull with .got space that we run > out of got space for building relativly simple programs like vim. > There is a workaround for this problem which is using compiling things > with the -Wa,-xgot option. Not really a good idea because it requires > recompilation of several packages with that option but at least it > works ... Add another bug - binutils 2.8.1 had a bug which was compensated by another bug in ld.so. So if we fix either one we break binary compatibility. Grrr, Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Wed Aug 18 00:09:13 1999 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA19798 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 00:09:11 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id PAA07900; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 15:05:53 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA88538 for linux-list; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 14:55:37 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA08195 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 14:55:20 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1] (may be forged)) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id OAA01251 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 14:55:16 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-26.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.26]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA17754 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 23:55:03 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA25505; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 15:51:24 +0200 Date: Tue, 17 Aug 1999 15:51:24 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: Binutils, once more ... Message-ID: <19990817155124.A25482@uni-koblenz.de> References: <19990815235634.A12336@uni-koblenz.de> <19990816021633.A13756@uni-koblenz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <19990816021633.A13756@uni-koblenz.de>; from Ralf Baechle on Mon, Aug 16, 1999 at 02:16:33AM +0200 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 1726 Lines: 40 On Mon, Aug 16, 1999 at 02:16:33AM +0200, Ralf Baechle wrote: > > Another binutils status report - as of now I still have two open bugs: > > > > - ld doesn't fill the .got entries for non-dynamic binaries. > > - binutils-current are so extremly wastefull with .got space that we run > > out of got space for building relativly simple programs like vim. > > There is a workaround for this problem which is using compiling things > > with the -Wa,-xgot option. Not really a good idea because it requires > > recompilation of several packages with that option but at least it > > works ... > > Add another bug - binutils 2.8.1 had a bug which was compensated by > another bug in ld.so. So if we fix either one we break binary > compatibility. I now have implemented a workaround for this problem. The fix consists of two parts, a patch to binutils which will tag all newly generated binaries and patch to libc which modifies the dynamic linker to do the right thing for the old and the new binary flavour. There are still victims of the problem, all binaries which have been linked statically against libdl, most important rpm. Since they incorporate the old broken dynamic linker which doesn't know how to handle correct ELF binaries they have to be rebuilt. For those installing their binaries the recommend upgrade procedure is: - upgrade rpm - upgrade glibc - upgrade binutils, if installed - install/upgrade any other binaries you wish to install/upgrade. The order is important! Note that I haven't produced any new binary packages yet since the above mentioned two problems with static linked binaries and the got bloatage still aren't fixed so this is just to keep you uptodate. Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Wed Aug 18 06:13:23 1999 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id GAA21939 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 06:13:21 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id VAA00117; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:11:26 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id VAA90744 for linux-list; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:03:36 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id VAA20032 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:03:29 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (zhangt@isee.zju.edu.cn) Received: from isee.zju.edu.cn (isee.zju.edu.cn [210.32.141.11]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via SMTP id VAA03737 for ; Tue, 17 Aug 1999 21:03:24 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (zhangt@isee.zju.edu.cn) Received: from isee.zju.edu.cn (unverified [210.32.141.158]) by isee.zju.edu.cn (EMWAC SMTPRS 0.83) with SMTP id ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 12:05:19 +0800 Message-ID: <37BA3421.969992F@isee.zju.edu.cn> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 12:18:41 +0800 From: Zhang Tao X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.03 [zhcn] (WinNT; I) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Majordomo@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-request@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, Majordomo@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: require help Content-Type: text/plain; charset=gb2312 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 158 Lines: 5 hello, I am a student.Can I obtain some MIPS architecture documents through your linux mailing list. If I could ,how and where ? thanks in advance. zhang tao From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Thu Aug 19 01:12:47 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA24946 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 01:12:45 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id QAA03618; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 16:10:02 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA65827 for linux-list; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 16:01:20 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA75757 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 16:01:10 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1] (may be forged)) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id QAA05477 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 16:01:07 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-3.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.3]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA19668 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 01:00:51 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id NAA08977; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 13:39:32 +0200 Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 13:39:32 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Cory Jon Hollingsworth Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Hard Hat and Tandem. Message-ID: <19990818133932.A8965@uni-koblenz.de> References: <37B70CDF.D938EA0D@real-time.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <37B70CDF.D938EA0D@real-time.com>; from Cory Jon Hollingsworth on Sun, Aug 15, 1999 at 01:54:24PM -0500 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 2046 Lines: 50 On Sun, Aug 15, 1999 at 01:54:24PM -0500, Cory Jon Hollingsworth wrote: > I have a Tandem model number CMN B006S that I'm trying to get Hard > Hat up and running on. This is a machine build for Tandem by SGI and, > based on the descriptions I have read, I believe it is a close cousin to > the Challenge S. > For instance an hinv returns: > Syestem: IP22 > Processor: 150 Mhz R4400, with FPU > Primary I-cache size: 16 Kbytes > Primary D-cache size: 16 Kbytes > Secondary cache size: 1024 Kbytes > Memory size: 256 Mbytes > SCSI Disk: scsi(0)disk(1) Could you send me a the full hinv output, just to verify that this system is really an IP22 with no Tandem specific specials? Further, what is the product name under which this Tandem was marketed? Is it CMN B006S? I'd like to document the fact that this machine is (un?)supported in the Linux/MIPS docs. > Now I have spent a some time browsing the archives and I know this > was a common problem some time ago on certain models of Indys. Yep, but it's fixed. > I can get the system to boot by replacing the Hard Hat vmlinux image > with the vmlinux-indy-initrd-990313.gz image found in > ftp.linux.sgi.com/pub/linux/mips/test. But that leaves me with a > crippled RAM disk image and a root prompt. I can NFS mount my Hard Hat > file system, but that doesn't help me run the installation. That particular kernel was on there for testing the initrd functionality, so you're experiencing exactly what is supposed to happen. > My question is: Can I get a precompiled vmlinux replacement for the > Hard Hat distribution which will allow me to continue with the > installation? Or, since Tandem is not officially supported, do I > spend the next couple of months hand assembling a root partition on the > machine from the bits I currently have working via NFS? There are several kernels in exactly the directory you got the initrd image from. I have never heared about these Tandem machine but I assume that it it identical to the Indy rsp. Challenge S. Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Wed Aug 18 18:38:58 1999 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id SAA24499 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 18:38:51 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id JAA08158; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 09:33:26 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id JAA28477 for linux-list; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 09:22:23 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id JAA76716 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 09:22:07 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (mikehill@hgeng.com) Received: from calvin.tor.onramp.ca (calvin.tor.onramp.ca [204.225.88.15]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via SMTP id JAA06182 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 09:22:05 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (mikehill@hgeng.com) Received: (qmail 26138 invoked from network); 18 Aug 1999 16:22:02 -0000 Received: from imail.hgeng.com (HELO bart.hgeng.com) (199.246.72.233) by mail.onramp.ca with SMTP; 18 Aug 1999 16:22:02 -0000 Received: by BART with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) id ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 12:19:30 -0400 Message-ID: From: Mike Hill To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: RE: Floptical Drive Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 12:19:29 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2232.9) Content-Type: text/plain Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 169 Lines: 5 Using the 2.2 kernel from CVS I've read a vfat diskette from my floptical drive; can this knowledge be applied to replace my IRIX system drive with a boot floppy? Mike From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Wed Aug 18 19:46:08 1999 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id TAA03668 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 19:46:07 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id KAA07854; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 10:44:09 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id KAA12013 for linux-list; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 10:31:29 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from soyuz.wellington.sgi.com (soyuz.wellington.sgi.com [134.14.64.194]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id KAA84617 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 10:31:24 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (alambie@csd.sgi.com) Received: from csd.sgi.com by soyuz.wellington.sgi.com via ESMTP (980427.SGI.8.8.8/940406.SGI) id FAA27051; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 05:31:06 +1200 (NZT) Message-ID: <37BAEDD8.BCE186DB@csd.sgi.com> Date: Wed, 18 Aug 1999 10:31:04 -0700 From: Alistair Lambie X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.05C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP32) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Zhang Tao CC: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: require help References: <37BA3421.969992F@isee.zju.edu.cn> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 427 Lines: 17 Zhang Tao wrote: > > hello, > I am a student.Can I obtain some MIPS architecture documents through > your linux mailing list. If I could ,how and where ? > thanks in advance. > zhang tao Hi, Try these sites: http://www.sgi.com/processors/ http://www.mips.com/publications/index.html Also some of the chip licensee's like www.qedinc.com and www.idt.com have information. Does this help? Regards, Alistair From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Thu Aug 19 03:59:50 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA04862 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 03:59:49 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id SAA04375; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 18:57:11 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id SAA92789 for linux-list; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 18:50:58 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id SAA96129 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 18:50:50 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1] (may be forged)) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id SAA08610 for ; Wed, 18 Aug 1999 18:50:48 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-3.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.3]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA02540 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 03:50:45 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA31150; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 03:50:32 +0200 Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 03:50:32 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: N32/64 Assembler work Message-ID: <19990819035032.C9737@uni-koblenz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 243 Lines: 6 Binutils now have more or less reached a state where we can use them to sanely build a distribution. What's still missing is support for the N32 and 64 ABIs in the assembler such that we also can build a 64-bit userland. Volunteers? Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Fri Aug 20 00:48:16 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA00737 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 00:48:11 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA01547; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 15:45:15 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA18484 for linux-list; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 15:34:58 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA79052 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 15:34:42 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1] (may be forged)) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA00336 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 15:34:39 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-3.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.3]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA29723 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 00:34:35 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id PAA13846; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 15:47:12 +0200 Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 15:47:12 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: ECOFF Message-ID: <19990819154712.A13843@uni-koblenz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 147 Lines: 4 Does anybody still rely on the linker support for ECOFF binaries? I'd like to drop the ECOFF emulations (mipsbig and mipslittle) from ld. Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Fri Aug 20 01:11:57 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA02646 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 01:11:53 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id QAA01327; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 16:08:42 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA72785 for linux-list; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 15:59:59 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA24807 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 15:59:56 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (cory@real-time.com) Received: from paladin.real-time.com (paladin.real-time.com [206.10.252.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA08309 for ; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 15:59:53 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (cory@real-time.com) Received: from real-time.com (mondas.dalekchess.org [206.147.104.202]) by paladin.real-time.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA22465; Thu, 19 Aug 1999 17:56:07 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <37BC8A94.289936FF@real-time.com> Date: Thu, 19 Aug 1999 17:52:04 -0500 From: Cory Jon Hollingsworth X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.9 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Baechle CC: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Hard Hat and Tandem. References: <37B70CDF.D938EA0D@real-time.com> <19990818133932.A8965@uni-koblenz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 4319 Lines: 107 Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Sun, Aug 15, 1999 at 01:54:24PM -0500, Cory Jon Hollingsworth wrote: > > > I have a Tandem model number CMN B006S that I'm trying to get Hard > > Hat up and running on. This is a machine build for Tandem by SGI and, > > based on the descriptions I have read, I believe it is a close cousin to > > the Challenge S. > > > For instance an hinv returns: > > Syestem: IP22 > > Processor: 150 Mhz R4400, with FPU > > Primary I-cache size: 16 Kbytes > > Primary D-cache size: 16 Kbytes > > Secondary cache size: 1024 Kbytes > > Memory size: 256 Mbytes > > SCSI Disk: scsi(0)disk(1) > > Could you send me a the full hinv output, just to verify that this > system is really an IP22 with no Tandem specific specials? > Well the above is all that comes from a straight hinv. I do get more if I do an 'hinv -t' or 'hinv -t -p' though. Half of the 'hinv -t -p' scrolls off the screen and the information seems to be redundant anyway (4 lines to describe serial port 1 for instance). Here is the output of an 'hinv -t'. system ARC SGI-IP22 key 0 processor CPU MIPS-R4400 key 0 processor FPU MIPS-R4400FPC key 0 cache primary icache 16 Kbytes (block 1 lines, line 16 bytes) cache primary dcache 16 Kbytes (block 1 lines, line 16 bytes) cache secondary cache 1024 Kbytes (block 1 lines, line 128 bytes) memory main 256 Mbytes controller network ec0 key 0 peripheral network key 0 adapter SCSI WD33C93B key 0 controller disk SGI SEAGATE ST31230N key 1 peripheral disk unit 0 controller serial IP22 tty key 0 peripheral line key 0 controller serial IP22 tty key 1 peripheral line key 0 controller keyboard pc kbd key 0 controller pointer pcms key 0 peripheral pointer key 0 Now I don't know what it means by keyboard and pointer. The machine has no keyboard or mouse port. It does have two serial ports that look like PS/2 mouse ports though. I'm running the dumb terminal off one right now. > Further, what is the product name under which this Tandem was marketed? > Is it CMN B006S? I'd like to document the fact that this machine is > (un?)supported in the Linux/MIPS docs. > I don't know to both questions. The only identification the outside of the box is the above model name/number affixed to the bottom panel. The box is jet black and says TANDEM in the lower right corner. I've opened it up and it has a copyright 1993 Silicon Graphics on one of the circuit boards, but the machine is absent of any obvious identification. > > My question is: Can I get a precompiled vmlinux replacement for the > > Hard Hat distribution which will allow me to continue with the > > installation? Or, since Tandem is not officially supported, do I > > spend the next couple of months hand assembling a root partition on the > > machine from the bits I currently have working via NFS? > > There are several kernels in exactly the directory you got the initrd > image from. > Cool. Any idea which one I should use? Or should I try them all until I find one that works? > > I have never heared about these Tandem machine but I assume that it it > identical to the Indy rsp. Challenge S. > Well I could give you a bastardized history lesson. Bastardized in the sense that I think I know the story, but could be wrong since I'm repeating info that has been passed to me through multiple sources. Tandem was a company situated in Texas that was in the business of selling business servers. At the time this box was purchased, Tandem was repackaging SGI hardware and selling them as Tandem servers. Since then Tandem has been bought by Compaq, which I believe where more or less bought Tandem in order to acquire the brand name. Currently I believe Compaq sells industrial computers under the Tandem name. I do not think those machines have a MIPS chip set though. Keep in mind everything or anything I said in the above paragraph may be wrong. 8-) I'm just repeating hear say. I actually have a second Tandem box which is still a mystery box since it requires a 220 outlet and the power grid in my apartment needs to be customized to support it. 8-) Once I get that monster up and running I'll have to run an hinv to see what it has for guts. Thanks. Cory From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Fri Aug 20 23:52:24 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA16712 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 23:52:21 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id OAA05259; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 14:44:32 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA79175 for linux-list; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 14:38:21 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA83420 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 14:38:00 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1] (may be forged)) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id OAA07429 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 14:37:45 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-29.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.29]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA16371 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 23:37:41 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id DAA25024; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 03:23:12 +0200 Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 03:23:12 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Cory Jon Hollingsworth Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Hard Hat and Tandem. Message-ID: <19990820032312.A25007@uni-koblenz.de> References: <37B70CDF.D938EA0D@real-time.com> <19990818133932.A8965@uni-koblenz.de> <37BC8A94.289936FF@real-time.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <37BC8A94.289936FF@real-time.com>; from Cory Jon Hollingsworth on Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 05:52:04PM -0500 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 3620 Lines: 84 On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 05:52:04PM -0500, Cory Jon Hollingsworth wrote: > Well the above is all that comes from a straight hinv. I do get more if > I do an 'hinv -t' or 'hinv -t -p' though. Half of the 'hinv -t -p' scrolls > off the screen and the information seems to be redundant anyway (4 lines to > describe serial port 1 for instance). > > Here is the output of an 'hinv -t'. > > system ARC SGI-IP22 key 0 > processor CPU MIPS-R4400 key 0 > processor FPU MIPS-R4400FPC key 0 > cache primary icache 16 Kbytes (block 1 lines, line 16 bytes) > cache primary dcache 16 Kbytes (block 1 lines, line 16 bytes) > cache secondary cache 1024 Kbytes (block 1 lines, line 128 bytes) > memory main 256 Mbytes > controller network ec0 key 0 > peripheral network key 0 > adapter SCSI WD33C93B key 0 > controller disk SGI SEAGATE ST31230N key 1 > peripheral disk unit 0 > controller serial IP22 tty key 0 > peripheral line key 0 > controller serial IP22 tty key 1 > peripheral line key 0 > controller keyboard pc kbd key 0 > controller pointer pcms key 0 > peripheral pointer key 0 This looks indeed very much like an Indy, less a Challenge S. A Challenge S usually has an additional WD33C95 SCSI controller as well as an extra Ethernet. Also, afaik the keyboard controller has been removed from the Challenge. So your machine looks like an Indy with the GFX removed. > > Is it CMN B006S? I'd like to document the fact that this machine is > > (un?)supported in the Linux/MIPS docs. > > > > I don't know to both questions. The only identification the outside of > the box is the above model name/number affixed to the bottom panel. The box > is jet black and says TANDEM in the lower right corner. I've opened it up > and it has a copyright 1993 Silicon Graphics on one of the circuit boards, > but the machine is absent of any obvious identification. Too bad. Guess for now I'll just use that ``CMN B006S'' ... > > There are several kernels in exactly the directory you got the initrd > > image from. > > > > Cool. Any idea which one I should use? Or should I try them all until I > find one that works? Sorry, offhand I don't know which one is working. Most of these kernel binaries have been uploaded by others and since I roll my own kernels ... > Well I could give you a bastardized history lesson. Bastardized in the > sense that I think I know the story, but could be wrong since I'm repeating > info that has been passed to me through multiple sources. I think it's called rumour ;-) > Tandem was a company situated in Texas that was in the business of > selling business servers. At the time this box was purchased, Tandem was > repackaging SGI hardware and selling them as Tandem servers. Since then > Tandem has been bought by Compaq, which I believe where more or less bought > Tandem in order to acquire the brand name. Currently I believe Compaq sells > industrial computers under the Tandem name. I do not think those machines > have a MIPS chip set though. Tandem has a very interesting program of HA machines and software. They have more or less the only UNIX systems that guarantee like 99.99999% availability. > I actually have a second Tandem box which is still a mystery box since it > requires a 220 outlet and the power grid in my apartment needs to be > customized to support it. 8-) Once I get that monster up and running I'll > have to run an hinv to see what it has for guts. 220 everywhere here. But I fear that I'll soon need a 400V connector for my next machine ... Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sat Aug 21 00:57:22 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA26990 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 00:57:20 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id PAA21452; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:52:59 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA45471 for linux-list; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:46:13 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA14722 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:46:08 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from rover.village.org (rover.village.org [204.144.255.49]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA08066 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:46:06 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (harmony.village.org [10.0.0.6]) by rover.village.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA57450; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 16:45:54 -0600 (MDT) (envelope-from imp@harmony.village.org) Received: from harmony.village.org (localhost.village.org [127.0.0.1]) by harmony.village.org (8.9.3/8.8.3) with ESMTP id QAA39630; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 16:45:59 -0600 (MDT) Message-Id: <199908202245.QAA39630@harmony.village.org> To: Ralf Baechle Subject: Re: ECOFF Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu In-reply-to: Your message of "Thu, 19 Aug 1999 15:47:12 +0200." <19990819154712.A13843@uni-koblenz.de> References: <19990819154712.A13843@uni-koblenz.de> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 16:45:59 -0600 From: Warner Losh Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 285 Lines: 7 In message <19990819154712.A13843@uni-koblenz.de> Ralf Baechle writes: : Does anybody still rely on the linker support for ECOFF binaries? I'd : like to drop the ECOFF emulations (mipsbig and mipslittle) from ld. Doesn't LILO for the little endian ARC machines require this? Warner From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sat Aug 21 01:02:19 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA27309 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 01:02:17 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA09268; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:56:30 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA16019 for linux-list; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:50:30 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA28067 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:50:28 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1] (may be forged)) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA04724 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 15:50:21 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-29.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.29]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA18948 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 00:50:17 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA14751; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 00:49:44 +0200 Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 00:49:44 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Warner Losh Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: ECOFF Message-ID: <19990821004944.D25686@uni-koblenz.de> References: <19990819154712.A13843@uni-koblenz.de> <199908202245.QAA39630@harmony.village.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <199908202245.QAA39630@harmony.village.org>; from Warner Losh on Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 04:45:59PM -0600 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 751 Lines: 16 On Fri, Aug 20, 1999 at 04:45:59PM -0600, Warner Losh wrote: > In message <19990819154712.A13843@uni-koblenz.de> Ralf Baechle writes: > : Does anybody still rely on the linker support for ECOFF binaries? I'd > : like to drop the ECOFF emulations (mipsbig and mipslittle) from ld. > > Doesn't LILO for the little endian ARC machines require this? You mean Milo ... Milo needs to be ECOFF but our compiler produces ELF output. Furthermore since we need relocatable ECOFF binaries for the SNI firmware (actually the specs require it, but only on SNI we really need it) we have to link PIC code to ECOFF. And that is way too strong stuff for ld to cope with. That's why we're using elf2ecoff which is now included with every Linux kernel. Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sat Aug 21 02:59:32 1999 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA22213 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 02:59:30 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id RAA07702; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 17:57:26 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id RAA96885 for linux-list; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 17:50:43 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id RAA01784 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 17:50:40 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (cory@real-time.com) Received: from paladin.real-time.com (paladin.real-time.com [206.10.252.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id RAA03456 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 17:50:37 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (cory@real-time.com) Received: from real-time.com (mondas.dalekchess.org [206.147.104.202]) by paladin.real-time.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA12601; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 19:50:04 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <37BDF6BA.DAFDC837@real-time.com> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 19:45:47 -0500 From: Cory Jon Hollingsworth X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.9 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Ralf Baechle CC: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Hard Hat and Tandem. References: <37B70CDF.D938EA0D@real-time.com> <19990818133932.A8965@uni-koblenz.de> <37BC8A94.289936FF@real-time.com> <19990820032312.A25007@uni-koblenz.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 3559 Lines: 84 Ralf Baechle wrote: > On Thu, Aug 19, 1999 at 05:52:04PM -0500, Cory Jon Hollingsworth wrote: > > > Well the above is all that comes from a straight hinv. I do get more if > > I do an 'hinv -t' or 'hinv -t -p' though. Half of the 'hinv -t -p' scrolls > > off the screen and the information seems to be redundant anyway (4 lines to > > describe serial port 1 for instance). > > > > Here is the output of an 'hinv -t'. > > > > system ARC SGI-IP22 key 0 > > processor CPU MIPS-R4400 key 0 > > processor FPU MIPS-R4400FPC key 0 > > cache primary icache 16 Kbytes (block 1 lines, line 16 bytes) > > cache primary dcache 16 Kbytes (block 1 lines, line 16 bytes) > > cache secondary cache 1024 Kbytes (block 1 lines, line 128 bytes) > > memory main 256 Mbytes > > controller network ec0 key 0 > > peripheral network key 0 > > adapter SCSI WD33C93B key 0 > > controller disk SGI SEAGATE ST31230N key 1 > > peripheral disk unit 0 > > controller serial IP22 tty key 0 > > peripheral line key 0 > > controller serial IP22 tty key 1 > > peripheral line key 0 > > controller keyboard pc kbd key 0 > > controller pointer pcms key 0 > > peripheral pointer key 0 > > This looks indeed very much like an Indy, less a Challenge S. A Challenge S > usually has an additional WD33C95 SCSI controller as well as an extra > Ethernet. Also, afaik the keyboard controller has been removed from > the Challenge. So your machine looks like an Indy with the GFX removed. > Actually it does have the second SCSI, but it is not showing up in the hinv for some reason. I've opened up the box again to have another peak at the boards. The top board says this: Silicon Graphics Inc. Copyright 1994 SCSI-MEZZ CHALLENGE-S 030-8221-002 REV: D This board has the WD33C95 SCSI controller chip on it. This board has two wide SCSI ports out the back and an RJ45 which should be an ethernet. It has the little network symbol by it. I initially tried that RJ45 port for bootp, but had no success. The main board below it has a female DB15 connector that I connect a ethernet transceiver to in order to run bootp. The bottom board additionally has the two PS/2 like serial ports, one DB25 female (don't know what it is), and a thin SCSI port. It has no keyboard or mouse port even though the hinv claims it does. I wonder if this machine could be loaded with the incorrect boot prom? > > > Tandem was a company situated in Texas that was in the business of > > selling business servers. At the time this box was purchased, Tandem was > > repackaging SGI hardware and selling them as Tandem servers. Since then > > Tandem has been bought by Compaq, which I believe where more or less bought > > Tandem in order to acquire the brand name. Currently I believe Compaq sells > > industrial computers under the Tandem name. I do not think those machines > > have a MIPS chip set though. > > Tandem has a very interesting program of HA machines and software. They > have more or less the only UNIX systems that guarantee like 99.99999% > availability. > Yeah it looks like Tandem is still around. And it looks like you can still buy MIPS based systems from them, although the sticker shock would probably kill most of us mere mortals. 8-) I think the claim they make is more spectacular than the hardware they sell. They were making this claim back when my Tandem was made, and as you can see it is basically a Challenge S or Indy. Thanks. Cory From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sat Aug 21 03:24:28 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA24024 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 03:24:27 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id SAA10774; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:21:18 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id SAA29838 for linux-list; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:18:21 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from fir.engr.sgi.com (fir.engr.sgi.com [150.166.40.90]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id SAA04384; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:18:16 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (wje@fir.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from wje@localhost) by fir.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id SAA28865; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:18:11 -0700 From: "William J. Earl" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14269.65107.528164.540174@fir.engr.sgi.com> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:18:11 -0700 (PDT) To: Cory Jon Hollingsworth Cc: Ralf Baechle , linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Hard Hat and Tandem. In-Reply-To: <37BDF6BA.DAFDC837@real-time.com> References: <37B70CDF.D938EA0D@real-time.com> <19990818133932.A8965@uni-koblenz.de> <37BC8A94.289936FF@real-time.com> <19990820032312.A25007@uni-koblenz.de> <37BDF6BA.DAFDC837@real-time.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under Emacs 19.34.1 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1365 Lines: 28 Cory Jon Hollingsworth writes: ... > I've opened up the box again to have another peak at the boards. The top > board says this: > Silicon Graphics Inc. Copyright 1994 > SCSI-MEZZ CHALLENGE-S 030-8221-002 REV: D > > This board has the WD33C95 SCSI controller chip on it. This board has two > wide SCSI ports out the back and an RJ45 which should be an ethernet. It has the > little network symbol by it. I initially tried that RJ45 port for bootp, but had > no success. The main board below it has a female DB15 connector that I connect a > ethernet transceiver to in order to run bootp. > > The bottom board additionally has the two PS/2 like serial ports, one DB25 > female (don't know what it is), and a thin SCSI port. > > It has no keyboard or mouse port even though the hinv claims it does. I > wonder if this machine could be loaded with the incorrect boot prom? ... The keyboard and mouse hardware is in the ASIC set, just not attached to connectors. This is definitely a Challenge-S. The mezzanine card (which plugs into the GIO connectors where the Indy graphics card would be) is probably not being recognized by the drivers you have configured, both for the WD33C95 SCSI controller and the extra Ethernet controller. That is, you see the base SCSI and Ethernet, not the extras on the mezzanine card. From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sat Aug 21 03:43:18 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id DAA31138 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 03:43:17 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id SAA01733; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:40:02 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id SAA65285 for linux-list; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:35:50 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id SAA04508 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:35:45 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (drmc@microdash.com) Received: from ns1.microdash.com (rat.oeinc.com [207.207.75.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id SAA06649 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:35:43 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (drmc@microdash.com) From: drmc@microdash.com Received: from mail.microdash.com (IDENT:drmc@mail.microdash.com [207.207.75.6]) by ns1.microdash.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id SAA26944 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:35:13 -0700 Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:35:13 -0700 (PDT) To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Linux for the Indigo 1 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 178 Lines: 4 Please tell me that linux is available for the SGI IRIS Indigo 1 r4k. or at least point me in the direction of info regarding this neat little box. Thanks in advance, D Jackson From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sat Aug 21 04:03:07 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA32451 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 04:03:06 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id SAA14873; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:59:38 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id SAA87858 for linux-list; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:55:09 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com (kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com [150.166.49.139]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id SAA09458 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:55:07 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id SAA81529; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 18:55:04 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <199908210155.SAA81529@kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com> To: Cory Jon Hollingsworth Cc: linux@kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Hard Hat and Tandem. In-reply-to: Your message of "Fri, 20 Aug 99 19:45:47 CDT." <37BDF6BA.DAFDC837@real-time.com> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 99 18:55:03 -0700 From: Joan Eslinger Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 1010 Lines: 20 * > > Tandem was a company situated in Texas that was in the business of Texas? Headquarters was Cupertino, California. * > > selling business servers. At the time this box was purchased, Tandem was * > > repackaging SGI hardware and selling them as Tandem servers. Since then * > > Tandem has been bought by Compaq, which I believe where more or less bought * > > Tandem in order to acquire the brand name. Currently I believe Compaq sells * > > industrial computers under the Tandem name. I do not think those machines * > > have a MIPS chip set though. * > * > Tandem has a very interesting program of HA machines and software. They * > have more or less the only UNIX systems that guarantee like 99.99999% * > availability. Tandem had 2 computer lines: the fault-tolorant Himalaya line running their own OS called Non-Stop built with MIPS CPUs, and the Integrity line which was OEM'ed SGI Challenge servers running IRIX. Looks like new Himalaya servers are built around Alpha CPUs. From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sat Aug 21 04:10:01 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA00101 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 04:09:59 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id TAA01406; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 19:07:37 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id TAA16148 for linux-list; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 19:04:49 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com (kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com [150.166.49.139]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id TAA12972 for ; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 19:04:47 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com) Received: from fir.engr.sgi.com (fir.engr.sgi.com [150.166.40.90]) by kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via SMTP id TAA15116; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 19:04:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from wje@localhost) by fir.engr.sgi.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id TAA28972; Fri, 20 Aug 1999 19:04:42 -0700 From: "William J. Earl" MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-ID: <14270.2362.99682.830523@fir.engr.sgi.com> Date: Fri, 20 Aug 1999 19:04:42 -0700 (PDT) To: Joan Eslinger Cc: Cory Jon Hollingsworth , linux@kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Hard Hat and Tandem. In-Reply-To: <199908210155.SAA81529@kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com> References: <37BDF6BA.DAFDC837@real-time.com> <199908210155.SAA81529@kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com> X-Mailer: VM 6.72 under Emacs 19.34.1 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1497 Lines: 27 Joan Eslinger writes: > * > > Tandem was a company situated in Texas that was in the business of > > Texas? Headquarters was Cupertino, California. > > * > > selling business servers. At the time this box was purchased, Tandem was > * > > repackaging SGI hardware and selling them as Tandem servers. Since then > * > > Tandem has been bought by Compaq, which I believe where more or less bought > * > > Tandem in order to acquire the brand name. Currently I believe Compaq sells > * > > industrial computers under the Tandem name. I do not think those machines > * > > have a MIPS chip set though. > * > > * > Tandem has a very interesting program of HA machines and software. They > * > have more or less the only UNIX systems that guarantee like 99.99999% > * > availability. > > Tandem had 2 computer lines: the fault-tolorant Himalaya line running > their own OS called Non-Stop built with MIPS CPUs, and the Integrity > line which was OEM'ed SGI Challenge servers running IRIX. Tandem had more lines than that. They sold the S/3, which was a triple-modular-redundant UNIX box, with MIPS processors and a hardened version of MIPS RISC/os, mainly sold to telephone companies. The S/3 was designed and built in Texas. They also OEMed various SGI servers and workstations, notably Indy and Challenge/S systems. The Tandem versions of the latter were identical to the SGI versions, except that the plastic covers were black with a Tandem logo. From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sat Aug 21 12:33:32 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA14701 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 12:33:30 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id DAA04996; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 03:30:53 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id DAA23727 for linux-list; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 03:25:25 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com (kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com [150.166.49.139]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id DAA77638 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 03:25:21 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com) Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id DAA71157; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 03:25:14 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id DAA57977; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 03:25:14 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (cory@real-time.com) Received: from paladin.real-time.com (paladin.real-time.com [206.10.252.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id DAA02898; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 03:25:13 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (cory@real-time.com) Received: from real-time.com (mondas.dalekchess.org [206.147.104.202]) by paladin.real-time.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id FAA16186; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 05:25:12 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <37BE7D80.20B8D36A@real-time.com> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 05:20:49 -0500 From: Cory Jon Hollingsworth X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.9 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Joan Eslinger CC: linux@kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Hard Hat and Tandem. References: <199908210155.SAA81529@kilimanjaro.engr.sgi.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1302 Lines: 31 Joan Eslinger wrote: > * > > Tandem was a company situated in Texas that was in the business of > > Texas? Headquarters was Cupertino, California. > Hey I said my history was bastardized. If that is the only fact I got wrong I feel quite happy. > > * > > selling business servers. At the time this box was purchased, Tandem was > * > > repackaging SGI hardware and selling them as Tandem servers. Since then > * > > Tandem has been bought by Compaq, which I believe where more or less bought > * > > Tandem in order to acquire the brand name. Currently I believe Compaq sells > * > > industrial computers under the Tandem name. I do not think those machines > * > > have a MIPS chip set though. > * > > * > Tandem has a very interesting program of HA machines and software. They > * > have more or less the only UNIX systems that guarantee like 99.99999% > * > availability. > > Tandem had 2 computer lines: the fault-tolorant Himalaya line running > their own OS called Non-Stop built with MIPS CPUs, and the Integrity > line which was OEM'ed SGI Challenge servers running IRIX. > > Looks like new Himalaya servers are built around Alpha CPUs. So I can confidently say I have a Challenge S with a Tandem cover. The machine was running IRIX prior to me acquiring it. From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sun Aug 22 00:36:02 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA06062 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 00:36:00 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA03843; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:32:17 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA70486 for linux-list; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:27:15 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA62988 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:27:11 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tshrider@kascope.com) Received: from vertigo.gndn.org ([216.50.90.66]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA01152 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:27:09 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tshrider@kascope.com) Received: from localhost (tshrider@localhost) by vertigo.gndn.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id MAA00581; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 12:27:44 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: vertigo.gndn.org: tshrider owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 12:27:44 -0500 (EST) From: "Todd M. Shrider" X-Sender: tshrider@vertigo.gndn.org To: brett cc: William Holmes , Linux Subject: Re: Root Password In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 1537 Lines: 53 hehe... well, that will work to, I guess... :-) -- Todd M. Shrider Coder Emeritus Kaleidoscope Inc. The Diner Inc. tshrider@kascope.com (317)581-6378 I degaussed my girlfriend and I'm just not attracted to her anymore. On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, brett wrote: > not having a system cd for an old Indigo I went over to rootshell.com and > got a root exploit for the system. > > b > > > > On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Todd M. Shrider wrote: > > > > > You'll need the system cd's, or at least the first cd, to reset the root > > passwd. When the system starts, press escape to go into the maintenance > > menu and then choose install system software. (Were not actually going to > > install the system software). At the meno choose Administration (opetion > > 13 I believe) and then type chroot > > > > This will put you at a prompt so you can type passwd and give a new root > > passwd. As far as I know this is the only way to change things... > > > > > > -- > > Todd M. Shrider Coder Emeritus > > Kaleidoscope Inc. The Diner Inc. > > tshrider@kascope.com (317)581-6378 > > > > I degaussed my girlfriend and I'm > > just not attracted to her anymore. > > > > On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, William Holmes wrote: > > > > > I just got a O2 system and the root password is set and I have no idea what it is. System runnig fine with IRIX 6.3 but no CD'S. I know this doesn't have any thing to do with LINUX but can some one help? > > > > > > Thanks In Advance > > > > > > William Holmes > > > > > > > > From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sat Aug 21 20:01:39 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id UAA29019 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 20:01:36 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id KAA06222; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 10:58:30 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id KAA75229 for linux-list; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 10:48:06 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id KAA14112 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 10:48:02 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (palsoft@earthlink.net) Received: from harrier.prod.itd.earthlink.net (harrier.prod.itd.earthlink.net [207.217.121.12]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id KAA08668 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 10:47:55 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (palsoft@earthlink.net) Received: from billholmes (pool0165.cvx20-bradley.dialup.earthlink.net [209.179.250.165]) by harrier.prod.itd.earthlink.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id KAA16809 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 10:47:51 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <001401beebfc$4eab7ce0$a5fab3d1@billholmes> From: "William Holmes" To: "Linux" Subject: Root Password Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 10:40:46 -0700 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_0011_01BEEBC1.A065E380" X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2615.200 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2615.200 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 1285 Lines: 41 This is a multi-part message in MIME format. ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01BEEBC1.A065E380 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I just got a O2 system and the root password is set and I have no idea = what it is. System runnig fine with IRIX 6.3 but no CD'S. I know this = doesn't have any thing to do with LINUX but can some one help? Thanks In Advance William Holmes ------=_NextPart_000_0011_01BEEBC1.A065E380 Content-Type: text/html; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I just got a O2=20 system and the root password is set and I have no idea what it = is.=20 System runnig fine with IRIX 6.3 but no CD'S. I know this doesn't have = any thing=20 to do with LINUX but can some one help?
 
Thanks In Advance
 
William Holmes
------=_NextPart_000_0011_01BEEBC1.A065E380-- From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sat Aug 21 22:37:01 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA18731 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 22:37:00 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id NAA26633; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 13:32:19 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA30136 for linux-list; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 13:27:01 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA98354 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 13:26:57 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tshrider@kascope.com) Received: from vertigo.gndn.org ([216.50.90.66]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id NAA00183 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 13:26:56 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (tshrider@kascope.com) Received: from localhost (tshrider@localhost) by vertigo.gndn.org (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id QAA01118; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 16:19:32 -0500 X-Authentication-Warning: vertigo.gndn.org: tshrider owned process doing -bs Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 16:19:31 -0500 (EST) From: "Todd M. Shrider" X-Sender: tshrider@vertigo.gndn.org To: William Holmes cc: Linux Subject: Re: Root Password In-Reply-To: <001401beebfc$4eab7ce0$a5fab3d1@billholmes> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 959 Lines: 27 You'll need the system cd's, or at least the first cd, to reset the root passwd. When the system starts, press escape to go into the maintenance menu and then choose install system software. (Were not actually going to install the system software). At the meno choose Administration (opetion 13 I believe) and then type chroot This will put you at a prompt so you can type passwd and give a new root passwd. As far as I know this is the only way to change things... -- Todd M. Shrider Coder Emeritus Kaleidoscope Inc. The Diner Inc. tshrider@kascope.com (317)581-6378 I degaussed my girlfriend and I'm just not attracted to her anymore. On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, William Holmes wrote: > I just got a O2 system and the root password is set and I have no idea what it is. System runnig fine with IRIX 6.3 but no CD'S. I know this doesn't have any thing to do with LINUX but can some one help? > > Thanks In Advance > > William Holmes > From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sun Aug 22 00:10:25 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA04274 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 00:10:23 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id PAA01834; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:06:53 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA43363 for linux-list; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:02:40 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA41265 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:02:34 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (brett@madhouse.org) Received: from caligula.madhouse.org ([216.160.90.69]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via SMTP id PAA09586 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:02:33 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (brett@madhouse.org) Received: (qmail 20175 invoked by uid 509); 21 Aug 1999 22:09:26 -0000 Received: from localhost (sendmail-bs@127.0.0.1) by localhost with SMTP; 21 Aug 1999 22:09:26 -0000 Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 15:09:26 -0700 (PDT) From: brett To: "Todd M. Shrider" cc: William Holmes , Linux Subject: Re: Root Password In-Reply-To: Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 1179 Lines: 38 not having a system cd for an old Indigo I went over to rootshell.com and got a root exploit for the system. b On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Todd M. Shrider wrote: > > You'll need the system cd's, or at least the first cd, to reset the root > passwd. When the system starts, press escape to go into the maintenance > menu and then choose install system software. (Were not actually going to > install the system software). At the meno choose Administration (opetion > 13 I believe) and then type chroot > > This will put you at a prompt so you can type passwd and give a new root > passwd. As far as I know this is the only way to change things... > > > -- > Todd M. Shrider Coder Emeritus > Kaleidoscope Inc. The Diner Inc. > tshrider@kascope.com (317)581-6378 > > I degaussed my girlfriend and I'm > just not attracted to her anymore. > > On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, William Holmes wrote: > > > I just got a O2 system and the root password is set and I have no idea what it is. System runnig fine with IRIX 6.3 but no CD'S. I know this doesn't have any thing to do with LINUX but can some one help? > > > > Thanks In Advance > > > > William Holmes > > > > From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sun Aug 22 02:09:53 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA24952 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 02:09:51 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id RAA08144; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 17:06:11 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id RAA82267 for linux-list; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 17:02:29 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id RAA43607 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 17:02:26 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (cory@real-time.com) Received: from paladin.real-time.com (paladin.real-time.com [206.10.252.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id RAA07269 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 17:02:24 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (cory@real-time.com) Received: from real-time.com (mondas.dalekchess.org [206.147.104.202]) by paladin.real-time.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id TAA21539 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 19:02:23 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <37BF3CFF.ABB1A32B@real-time.com> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 18:57:51 -0500 From: Cory Jon Hollingsworth X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.9 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Tandem and Hard Hat, the Saga continues Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1503 Lines: 45 It boots and runs!!!! I've spent most of today installing (through trial and error) Hard Hat on the the Tandem. And It looks like I have been successful! Check it out: [root@Terminus /proc]# cat cpuinfo cpu : MIPS cpu model : R4000SC V5.0 system type : SGI Indy BogoMIPS : 74.96 byteorder : big endian unaligned accesses : 0 wait instruction : no microsecond timers : no extra interrupt vector : no hardware watchpoint : yes VCED exceptions : 10718 VCEI exceptions : 31543 [root@Terminus /proc]# dmesg |head ARCH: SGI-IP22 PROMLIB: SGI ARCS firmware Version 1 Revision 10 PROMLIB: Total free ram 265719808 bytes (259492K,253MB) CPU: MIPS-R4400 FPU ICACHE DCACHE SCACHE Loading R4000 MMU routines. CPU revision is: 00000450 Primary instruction cache 16kb, linesize 16 bytes) Primary data cache 16kb, linesize 16 bytes) Secondary cache sized at 1024K linesize 128 Linux version 2.2.1 (tsbogend@james.franken.de) (gcc version 2.7.2.3) #519 Mon Mar 29 01:24:17 MEST 1999 The installation process certainly wasn't what I would call smooth, but it was worth it. Thanks to everyone who provided me hints on identifying this machine. I have never had access to an Indy/Indigo/Challenge S before, so identifying this machine on my own would have been a total guess without the resources of this list and its archive. Now the fun begins. Thanks again. From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sun Aug 22 02:42:31 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id CAA09898 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 02:42:30 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id RAA10151; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 17:38:55 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id RAA54477 for linux-list; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 17:35:43 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id RAA59443 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 17:35:40 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (mrbill@feeding.frenzy.com) Received: from feeding.frenzy.com (feeding.frenzy.com [209.198.142.194]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id RAA06643 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 17:35:38 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (mrbill@feeding.frenzy.com) Received: (from mrbill@localhost) by feeding.frenzy.com (8.8.8/8.8.7) id TAA19195; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 19:35:37 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <19990821193536.A16860@frenzy.com> Date: Sat, 21 Aug 1999 19:35:36 -0500 From: Bill Bradford To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Indigo2 status? Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.91.1i Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 407 Lines: 9 Has anyone heard anything about the status of SGI Linux on an Indigo2? I've got this box here with 128mb and Extreme graphics, and am wishing I could fire up Linux on it.... -- Bill Bradford * mrbill@sunhelp.org * http://www.sunhelp.org ------------------------------------------------------------ >From a Sun Microsystems bug report (#4102680): "Workaround: don't pound on the mouse like a wild monkey." From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sun Aug 22 04:03:24 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA22266 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 04:03:23 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id SAA14977; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 18:59:00 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id SAA43338 for linux-list; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 18:52:48 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgindia.newdelhi.sgi.com (newdelhi.sgi.com [134.14.90.2]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id SAA48082 for ; Sat, 21 Aug 1999 18:52:41 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (raju@bhairavi.newdelhi.sgi.com) Received: from bhairavi.newdelhi.sgi.com (bhairavi.newdelhi.sgi.com [134.14.90.52]) by sgindia.newdelhi.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id HAA64294 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 07:07:54 +0530 (IST) Received: (from raju@localhost) by bhairavi.newdelhi.sgi.com (8.9.3/8.9.3) id HAA23977; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 07:34:20 +0530 (IST) Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 07:34:20 +0530 (IST) Message-Id: <199908220204.HAA23977@bhairavi.newdelhi.sgi.com> From: Raj Mathur To: "Linux" Subject: Root Password In-Reply-To: <001401beebfc$4eab7ce0$a5fab3d1@billholmes> References: <001401beebfc$4eab7ce0$a5fab3d1@billholmes> X-Mailer: VM 6.31 under 20.2 XEmacs Lucid Reply-To: raju@sgi.com Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 737 Lines: 24 I normally wouldn't reply to an HTML message, but this is a special case. Run the attached exploit to get a root shell, set TERM and edit /etc/passwd or /etc/shadow and remove the password. [Exploit suppresed] Regards, -- Raju >>>>> "William" == William Holmes writes: William> [1 ] I just William> got a O2 system and the root password is set and I have William> no idea what it is. System runnig fine with IRIX 6.3 but William> no CD'S. I know this doesn't have any thing to do with William> LINUX but can some one help? William> Thanks In Advance William> William Holmes [2 (quoted-printable)>] From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sun Aug 22 23:14:01 1999 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA16147 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 23:13:55 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id OAA04849; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 14:04:04 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id NAA24693 for linux-list; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 13:57:25 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id NAA53013 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 13:57:22 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1] (may be forged)) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id NAA03999 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 13:50:11 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-2.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.2]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id WAA26472 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 22:50:06 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id OAA15714; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 14:15:04 +0200 Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 14:15:04 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: MIPS64 Message-ID: <19990822141504.A15701@uni-koblenz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 1405 Lines: 30 Hi, as those who are tracking the CVS archive or the commit mailing list probably already have seen I've got started to work on a 64-bit kernel. I'm also using the chance to do a major overhaul of various code which over the years had turned into a major uglyness. In particular the machine abstraction layer needs some overhaul. Basically the attempt of doing generic kernels for MIPS is dead by now. Given the number of different firmware implementations and memory layouts makes it impossible to build a single generic kernel image that fits more than a few machines. In fact so far the only combo that was working at all was Magnum 4000 / PICA / RM200C. So I'm wiping out all that code which makes things look significantly nicer. As of now the MIPS64 code is still in it's very early stages; it doesn't even compile. However I'd like to invite other people to alreasy start working on porting the machine specific bits to MIPS64. I myself will initially only implement support for the SGI IP22. When this one is running flawless I'll go on with IP27 and SMP support. Even though I've invested a horrible amount of time int tracking down the bugs in current binutils they're still in a rather sad state for 64-bit stuff. Volunteers _urgently_ wanted. Note that these problems will also affect other operating system, so it doesn't necessarily have to be a Linux volunteer. Cheers, Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Sun Aug 22 23:26:01 1999 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA17142 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 23:26:00 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id OAA08555; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 14:23:39 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA95242 for linux-list; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 14:19:24 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA63133 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 14:19:21 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1] (may be forged)) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id OAA08377 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 14:19:17 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-2.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.2]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA28039 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 23:19:14 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA16826; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 23:17:48 +0200 Date: Sun, 22 Aug 1999 23:17:48 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Bradley D. LaRonde" Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: MIPS64 Message-ID: <19990822231747.D16497@uni-koblenz.de> References: <19990822141504.A15701@uni-koblenz.de> <00ee01beece1$18b16bf0$b8119526@ltc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <00ee01beece1$18b16bf0$b8119526@ltc.com>; from Bradley D. LaRonde on Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 04:58:33PM -0400 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 427 Lines: 11 On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 04:58:33PM -0400, Bradley D. LaRonde wrote: > Good news. I think this is a good move, especially if a flood of new ports > to new device starts pouring in from our project (LinuxCE). There are > already three new platoforms and two new processors on the drawing board > now. Note that it's not compeltly impossible, just unattractive to make a generic kernel. So if necessary we can do it. Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Mon Aug 23 00:40:55 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA01178 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 00:40:54 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id PAA17737; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 15:36:13 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA05294 for linux-list; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 15:30:28 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA67453 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 15:30:24 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1] (may be forged)) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA05625 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 15:30:21 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-2.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.2]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA01233 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 00:30:18 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA17581; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 00:28:32 +0200 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 00:28:31 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: "Bradley D. LaRonde" Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: MIPS64 Message-ID: <19990823002831.F16497@uni-koblenz.de> References: <19990822141504.A15701@uni-koblenz.de> <00ee01beece1$18b16bf0$b8119526@ltc.com> <19990822231747.D16497@uni-koblenz.de> <012601beeceb$6a4d19a0$b8119526@ltc.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <012601beeceb$6a4d19a0$b8119526@ltc.com>; from Bradley D. LaRonde on Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 06:12:25PM -0400 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 809 Lines: 20 On Sun, Aug 22, 1999 at 06:12:25PM -0400, Bradley D. LaRonde wrote: > > > Good news. I think this is a good move, especially if a flood of new > ports > > > to new device starts pouring in from our project (LinuxCE). There are > > > already three new platoforms and two new processors on the drawing board > > > now. > > > > Note that it's not compeltly impossible, just unattractive to make a > > generic kernel. So if necessary we can do it. > > I'm also thinking that platform-specifc kernels will be smaller and > potentially faster (less indirection), which is especially important on > platforms like the Clio and Cassiopea. For many systems we cannot drop all indirections. For example the Indy shipped with a large number of CPU options, each of which we have an optimized routine for. Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Mon Aug 23 01:23:15 1999 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id BAA03873 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 01:23:13 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id QAA03426; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 16:21:01 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id QAA56581 for linux-list; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 16:16:25 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id QAA55465 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 16:16:21 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (fcela@ce.chalmers.se) Received: from solen.ce.chalmers.se (solen.ce.chalmers.se [129.16.20.244]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id QAA07470 for ; Sun, 22 Aug 1999 16:16:20 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (fcela@ce.chalmers.se) Received: from blaklocka.ce.chalmers.se (blaklocka.ce.chalmers.se [129.16.20.152]) by solen.ce.chalmers.se (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id BAA13536 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 01:16:18 +0200 (MET DST) Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 01:16:17 +0200 (MET DST) From: Fernando Cela Diaz To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: X Server In-Reply-To: <19990823002831.F16497@uni-koblenz.de> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 44 Lines: 2 Do Linux for MIPS have a working X Server? From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Mon Aug 23 11:31:35 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id LAA13064 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 11:31:31 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id CAA07559; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 02:23:41 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id CAA08372 for linux-list; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 02:08:01 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id CAA04966 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 02:07:55 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (pete@alien.bt.co.uk) Received: from mail.alien.bt.co.uk (orb.alien.bt.co.uk [132.146.196.84]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via SMTP id CAA05768 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 02:07:46 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (pete@alien.bt.co.uk) Received: from cornfed(really [132.146.196.81]) by mail.alien.bt.co.uk via sendmail with smtp id for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:07:44 +0100 (BST) (Smail-3.2 1996-Jul-4 #3 built 1998-May-29) Message-Id: Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 10:06:02 +0100 (BST) From: Pete Young Reply-To: Pete Young Subject: Re: Root Password To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-MD5: tp5G1wp+TseMw2gAp4n1eQ== X-Mailer: dtmail 1.2.0 CDE Version 1.2 SunOS 5.6 i86pc i386 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from QUOTED-PRINTABLE to 8bit by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de id LAA13064 Content-Length: 578 Lines: 17 > hehe... well, that will work to, I guess... :-) Well, it did for me with an Indy running 5.3 . As an aside, Irix as shipped has to be the most simple unix variant to break that I've ever come across. Why on earth does all that stuff have to run setuid root? Never thought I'd be advocating a switch to Linux on security grounds, but there you go! Regards Pete ____________________________________________________________________ Pete Young pete@alien.bt.co.uk Phone +44 1473 642740 "Just another crouton, floating on the bouillabaisse of life" From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Mon Aug 23 12:26:12 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA23617 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 12:26:09 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id DAA04778; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 03:23:28 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id DAA30571 for linux-list; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 03:12:13 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from soyuz.wellington.sgi.com (soyuz.wellington.sgi.com [134.14.64.194]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id DAA73756 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 03:12:08 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (alambie@csd.sgi.com) Received: from csd.sgi.com by soyuz.wellington.sgi.com via ESMTP (980427.SGI.8.8.8/940406.SGI) id WAA26842; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 22:11:40 +1200 (NZT) Message-ID: <37C11F26.D2AB4969@csd.sgi.com> Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 22:15:02 +1200 From: Alistair Lambie X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6C-SGI [en] (X11; I; IRIX 6.5 IP32) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Pete Young CC: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Root Password References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1400 Lines: 31 Pete Young wrote: > > > hehe... well, that will work to, I guess... :-) > > Well, it did for me with an Indy running 5.3 . > > As an aside, Irix as shipped has to be the most simple unix variant to > break that I've ever come across. Why on earth does all that stuff have > to run setuid root? Never thought I'd be advocating a switch to Linux > on security grounds, but there you go! > I think that may be a bit unfair. Irix 5.3 is real old (Nov 17, 1994) and while it had many security issues I think a lot of other vendors probably did as well in that time frame. There are a lot of security patches available for Irix 5.3 and I'm guessing they are probably not loaded on the machine you are using. These patches are made available to everyone regardless of whether you have a support contract or not. You can find information at http://www.sgi.com/Support/security/security.html If you find something that is not fixed you can report it at that site as well. Cheers, Alistair -- Alistair Lambie alambie@csd.sgi.com SGI Global Product Support SGI Voicemail/VNET: 234-1455 Level 5, Cigna House, M/S: INZ-3780 PO Box 24 093, Ph: +64-4-494 6325 40 Mercer St, Wellington, Fax: +64-4-494 6321 New Zealand Mobile: +64-21-635 262 From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Mon Aug 23 16:43:16 1999 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA08342 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:42:22 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id HAA01084; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:39:25 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id HAA52859 for linux-list; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:30:34 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id HAA45984 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:30:30 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de) Received: from news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (news-ma.rhein-neckar.de [193.197.90.3]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id HAA02126 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:30:27 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de) Received: from arthur.rhein-neckar.de (uucp@localhost) by news-ma.rhein-neckar.de (8.8.8/8.8.8) with bsmtp id QAA01123; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:29:34 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de) Received: from aj by arthur.rhein-neckar.de with local (Exim 3.02 #1) id 11Iv5k-0005Xr-00; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:28:56 +0200 To: Ralf Baechle Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: MIPS64 References: <19990822141504.A15701@uni-koblenz.de> From: Andreas Jaeger Date: 23 Aug 1999 16:28:54 +0200 In-Reply-To: Ralf Baechle's message of "Sun, 22 Aug 1999 14:15:04 +0200" Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.070095 (Pterodactyl Gnus v0.95) XEmacs/21.1 (Arches) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 565 Lines: 15 >>>>> Ralf Baechle writes: > Hi, > as those who are tracking the CVS archive or the commit mailing list > probably already have seen I've got started to work on a 64-bit kernel. > I'm also using the chance to do a major overhaul of various code which > over the years had turned into a major uglyness. Could anybody provide me with infos about the commit mailing list? I couldn't find the information myself:-(. Thanks, Andreas -- Andreas Jaeger aj@arthur.rhein-neckar.de jaeger@informatik.uni-kl.de for pgp-key finger ajaeger@aixd1.rhrk.uni-kl.de From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Mon Aug 23 16:47:45 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA08913 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 16:47:43 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id HAA03120; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:44:50 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id HAA77493 for linux-list; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:38:16 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id HAA06680 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:38:14 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (andrewb@uab.edu) Received: from lilith.dpo.uab.edu (lilith.dpo.uab.edu [138.26.1.128]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id HAA00351 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 07:38:13 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (andrewb@uab.edu) Received: from mdk187.tucc.uab.edu (mdk187.tucc.uab.edu [138.26.15.201]) by lilith.dpo.uab.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id JAA31771; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 09:38:09 -0500 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 09:35:57 -0500 (CDT) From: "Andrew R. Baker" X-Sender: andrewb@mdk187.tucc.uab.edu To: Bill Bradford cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Indigo2 status? In-Reply-To: <19990821193536.A16860@frenzy.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 632 Lines: 15 On Sat, 21 Aug 1999, Bill Bradford wrote: > Has anyone heard anything about the status of SGI Linux on an Indigo2? > I've got this box here with 128mb and Extreme graphics, and am wishing > I could fire up Linux on it.... Well, you won't be able to use your graphics card yet, but you can still get it up and running. Set yourself up with a serial console, and follow the installation instructions on http://www.linux.sgi.com/ and off you go. You'll probably want to build your own kernel from the CVS arvhive, as it will have more recent changes. Support for the (E)ISA bus should be coming along sometime this week. -Andrew From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Mon Aug 23 21:19:45 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id VAA21204 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 21:19:41 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id MAA05259; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 12:16:07 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id MAA41676 for linux-list; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 12:06:54 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id MAA57367 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 12:06:49 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (drmc@microdash.com) Received: from ns1.microdash.com (rat.oeinc.com [207.207.75.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id MAA05946 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 12:06:48 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (drmc@microdash.com) From: drmc@microdash.com Received: from mail.microdash.com (IDENT:drmc@mail.microdash.com [207.207.75.6]) by ns1.microdash.com (8.9.3/8.8.7) with ESMTP id MAA04566 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 12:06:05 -0700 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 12:06:05 -0700 (PDT) To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Status on a Indigo 1 (r4000) ? Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 366 Lines: 6 What is the status of Linux on a Indigo 1 R4000 ? I just procured a IRIS Indigo R4000 Entry with a video card upgrade ( elan I think ) 50 Megs of RAM but has no OS .. I came across a IRIX 5.3 cd set .. but I'd rather use linux. Any help installing linux on this platform or any idea how I can tweak something to make it work, would be immensely appreciated. David From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Tue Aug 24 00:07:26 1999 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA19013 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:07:24 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id OAA06289; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:48:13 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA14045 for linux-list; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:38:49 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA72796 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:38:39 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1] (may be forged)) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id OAA07164 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 14:36:58 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-5.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.5]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA06003 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 23:34:36 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id XAA20888; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 23:30:43 +0200 Date: Mon, 23 Aug 1999 23:30:43 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Tom Woelfel Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: ECOFF Message-ID: <19990823233043.B19012@uni-koblenz.de> References: <19990819154712.A13843@uni-koblenz.de> <199908231009.MAA27147@sun168.eu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: <199908231009.MAA27147@sun168.eu>; from Tom Woelfel on Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 12:09:26PM +0200 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 729 Lines: 16 On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 12:09:26PM +0200, Tom Woelfel wrote: > Ralf Baechle writes: > > Does anybody still rely on the linker support for ECOFF binaries? I'd > > like to drop the ECOFF emulations (mipsbig and mipslittle) from ld. > > I still have an Indy with the "very old boot prom" problem (it's 5.3 > in your HOWTO ;-). I don't have an idea if this in any way related to > this. But if so (and in case "old prom Indy's" will then not boot) > it seems to me a good idea to put a hint or a workaround in the HOWTO. No problem, that's why we have elf2ecoff as part of the kernel sources. Directly linking elf to ecoff is too strong stuff for ld anyway, at least for some of the ultra hairy case we have to handle. Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Tue Aug 24 00:23:11 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA20303 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:23:05 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA03506; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 15:20:07 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA23288 for linux-list; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 15:14:17 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA02218 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 15:14:11 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (mailhost.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.64.1] (may be forged)) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA00493 for ; Mon, 23 Aug 1999 15:13:55 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (ralf@lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de) Received: from lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (cacc-5.uni-koblenz.de [141.26.131.5]) by mailhost.uni-koblenz.de (8.9.1/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA08335 for ; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:13:42 +0200 (MET DST) Received: (from ralf@localhost) by lappi.waldorf-gmbh.de (8.9.3/8.9.3) id AAA21346; Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:09:37 +0200 Date: Tue, 24 Aug 1999 00:09:37 +0200 From: Ralf Baechle To: Andreas Jaeger Cc: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com, linux-mips@fnet.fr, linux-mips@vger.rutgers.edu Subject: Re: MIPS64 Message-ID: <19990824000937.J19012@uni-koblenz.de> References: <19990822141504.A15701@uni-koblenz.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Mailer: Mutt 0.95.4us In-Reply-To: ; from Andreas Jaeger on Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 04:28:54PM +0200 X-Accept-Language: de,en,fr Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 657 Lines: 15 On Mon, Aug 23, 1999 at 04:28:54PM +0200, Andreas Jaeger wrote: > > as those who are tracking the CVS archive or the commit mailing list > > probably already have seen I've got started to work on a 64-bit kernel. > > I'm also using the chance to do a major overhaul of various code which > > over the years had turned into a major uglyness. > Could anybody provide me with infos about the commit mailing list? I > couldn't find the information myself:-(. Yep, because it's not documented. The mailing list is a plain sendmail alias. But I think you can also subscribe to it by echo "subscribe linux-progress" | mail majordomo@engr.sgi.com Ralf From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Thu Aug 26 07:02:42 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id HAA19115 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 07:02:40 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id VAA02498; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 21:52:12 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id VAA62395 for linux-list; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 21:46:07 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id VAA42995 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 21:45:58 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (simba@secns.sec.samsung.co.kr) Received: from network.sec.samsung.co.kr (secns.sec.samsung.co.kr [168.219.201.3]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id VAA00148 for ; Wed, 25 Aug 1999 21:45:53 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (simba@secns.sec.samsung.co.kr) Received: from simba.samsung.co.kr ([168.219.244.175]) by network.sec.samsung.co.kr (8.8.8H1/8.8.8) with SMTP id NAA19915; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 13:54:44 +0900 (KST) Received: by simba.samsung.co.kr with Microsoft Mail id <01BEEFC9.E02A8320@simba.samsung.co.kr>; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 13:49:54 +0900 Message-ID: <01BEEFC9.E02A8320@simba.samsung.co.kr> From: simba To: "'linux-mips@fnet.fr'" , "'linux@engr.sgi.com'" Subject: About the error of building egcs cross-compiler for mips Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 13:49:48 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 1628 Lines: 43 Hello! Now I have some fatal error in building cross-compiler for MIPS using egcs- 1.1.2. My host linux is the redhat 5.0 running on the i586 machine. I used egcs-1.1.2 from cygnus ftp and configure instruction is $ ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/mips --with-newlib --target=mips-linux $ make ALL_TARGET_MODULES= LANGUAGES=c. The message of the error is following --------------------------------------------------- rm -f tmplibgcc2.a for name in _muldi3 _divdi3 _moddi3 _udivdi3 _umoddi3 _negdi2 _lshrdi3 _ashldi3 _ashrdi3 _ffsdi2 _udiv_w_sdiv _udivmoddi4 _cmpdi2 _ucmpdi2 _floatdidf _floatdisf _fixunsdfsi _fixunssfsi _fixunsdfdi _fixdfdi _fixunssfdi _fixsfdi _fixxfdi _fixunsxfdi _floatdixf _fixunsxfsi _fixtfdi _fixunstfdi _floatditf __gcc_bcmp _varargs __dummy _eprintf _bb _shtab _clear_cache _trampoline __main _exit _ctors _pure; \ do \ echo ${name}; \ /usr/src/mipsbuild/egcs-1.1.2/gcc/xgcc -B/usr/src/mipsbuild/egcs- 1.1.2/gcc/ -O2 -I/usr/include -DCROSS_COMPILE -DIN_GCC -g -O2 - I./include -g1 -DIN_LIBGCC2 -D__GCC_FLOAT_NOT_NEEDED -Dinhibit_libc -I. -I. -I./config -c -DL${name} \ ./libgcc2.c -o ${name}.o; \ if [ $? -eq 0 ] ; then true; else exit 1; fi; \ mips-linux-ar rc tmplibgcc2.a ${name}.o; \ rm -f ${name}.o; \ done _muldi3 xgcc: installation problem, cannot exec `mips-tfile': No such file or directory make[1]: *** [libgcc2.a] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/src/mipsbuild/egcs-1.1.2/gcc' make: *** [all-gcc] Error 2 [simba@elinux egcs-1.1.2]$ [simba@elinux egcs-1.1.2]$ ---------------------------------------- What's mips-tfile? I'm waiting your help! From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Thu Aug 26 09:58:15 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA15986 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 09:58:10 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id AAA23058; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 00:53:31 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id AAA13182 for linux-list; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 00:49:01 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id AAA32293 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 00:48:58 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (oeser@darmstadt.gmd.de) Received: from sonne.darmstadt.gmd.de (sonne.darmstadt.gmd.de [141.12.62.20]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id AAA08333 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 00:48:55 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (oeser@darmstadt.gmd.de) Received: from darmstadt.gmd.de (VaX@pc-dime [141.12.60.3]) by sonne.darmstadt.gmd.de (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id JAA23185 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 09:48:53 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <37C4F2A9.543E0E98@darmstadt.gmd.de> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 09:54:17 +0200 From: Jens Oeser X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Booting linux does not work fine. Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 585 Lines: 17 Hi! I tried to install linux to my sgi indy yesterday, kernel starts up normally and hangs after "Freeing unused kernel memory 44k freed". Then i only can reboot the machine. I really don't find the thing causing that, maybe someone can give me an advise to get linux to work fine. Hardware: ip22 175mhz 64/128mb ram (Depends which machine) 2gb hdd (2nd machine 2x1GB). hinv says that i have a indy 24bit ... does this card is supported? I think so, because kernel messages are printed on the screen, so entire linux should do so. So how can i get linux working? regards. Jens Oeser From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Thu Aug 26 16:02:14 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id QAA20702 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 16:00:45 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id GAA20036; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 06:55:07 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id GAA88689 for linux-list; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 06:50:43 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id GAA85759 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 06:50:35 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (angus@despair.pe-i.com) Received: from despair.pe-i.com (despair.pe-i.com [208.229.1.99]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via SMTP id GAA07874 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 06:50:34 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (angus@despair.pe-i.com) Received: (from angus@localhost) by despair.pe-i.com (950413.SGI.8.6.12/950213.SGI.AUTOCF) id IAA17789; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 08:46:30 -0500 From: "ANgus" Message-Id: <9908260846.ZM17785@despair.pe-i.com> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 08:46:30 -0500 In-Reply-To: Jens Oeser "Booting linux does not work fine." (Aug 26, 9:54am) References: <37C4F2A9.543E0E98@darmstadt.gmd.de> X-Mailer: Z-Mail (3.2.3 08feb96 MediaMail) To: Jens Oeser , linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Booting linux does not work fine. Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="PART-BOUNDARY=.19908260846.ZM17785.pe-i.com" Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 590 Lines: 26 --PART-BOUNDARY=.19908260846.ZM17785.pe-i.com Content-Description: Text Content-Type: text/plain ; charset=iso-8859-1 X-Zm-Decoding-Hint: mimencode -q -u Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Try using Raju Mathur's howto & not the standard bootp instructions; http://reality.sgi.com/raju/SGI-Linux-mini-HOWTO.html that got me past the "Freeing unused kernel memory 44k freed" point. But then I gave up with my Indy because it hung on installing the = Dev files. Tell me if you get further ... ANgus -- = =DE=D8=D7 --PART-BOUNDARY=.19908260846.ZM17785.pe-i.com-- From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Thu Aug 26 23:38:49 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id XAA10567 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 23:38:39 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id OAA01001; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 14:27:33 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id OAA45312 for linux-list; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 14:20:24 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id OAA27224 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 14:20:20 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (andrewb@uab.edu) Received: from lilith.dpo.uab.edu (lilith.dpo.uab.edu [138.26.1.128]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id OAA09577 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 14:19:59 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (andrewb@uab.edu) Received: from mdk187.tucc.uab.edu (mdk187.tucc.uab.edu [138.26.15.201]) by lilith.dpo.uab.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA28450 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 16:19:55 -0500 Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 16:17:46 -0500 (CDT) From: "Andrew R. Baker" X-Sender: andrewb@mdk187.tucc.uab.edu To: Linux SGI Subject: patch to support the EISA bus on the Indigo2 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: MULTIPART/MIXED; BOUNDARY="445303055-905674700-935702266=:17792" Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 24425 Lines: 414 This message is in MIME format. The first part should be readable text, while the remaining parts are likely unreadable without MIME-aware tools. Send mail to mime@docserver.cac.washington.edu for more info. --445303055-905674700-935702266=:17792 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Here is my initial patch for adding EISA support on the Indigo2. It has allowed me to get an ISA Etherlink III running in my Indigo2 with a couple of changes to the driver. Several things have yet to be done: I have not looked into DMA support; Interrupts on the EISA bus are not reported via /proc; "make config" won't allow you to select any (E)ISA bus network drivers; I have not looked at irq probing either. Also, remember that many drivers will not work on the Indigo2 because they were written with only little endian architectures in mind. Things I want some input on: 1) Should the #ifdefs for making the support optional be put somewhere else, it looks clunky in "indy_int.c". I thought about putting it in i8259.h by creating stubs if support is not supposed to compiled in. 2) Where in the /proc/interrupts output should the (E)ISA interrupts go? They have a range from 0-15. They could be interleaved with the current set with an [EISA] tag. Any opinions? -Andrew P.S. This goes against the 2.2 branch of the CVS tree. --445303055-905674700-935702266=:17792 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; name="indigo2.patch.1999.08.26" Content-ID: Content-Description: Content-Transfer-Encoding: BASE64 LS0tIGxpbnV4L2luY2x1ZGUvYXNtLW1pcHMvaTgyNTkuaC5vcmlnCVRodSBB dWcgMjYgMTU6Mjk6NTAgMTk5OQ0KKysrIGxpbnV4L2luY2x1ZGUvYXNtLW1p cHMvaTgyNTkuaAlXZWQgQXVnIDI1IDE3OjM0OjQ2IDE5OTkNCkBAIC0wLDAg KzEsMjYgQEANCisvKiANCisgKiBzZ2llaXNhLmg6IERlZmluZXMgZm9yIHRo ZSAoRSlJU0EgYnVzIG9uIHRoZSBTR0kgSW5kaWdvMg0KKyAqDQorICogQ29w eXJpZ2h0IChDKSAxOTk5IEFuZHJldyBSLiBCYWtlciAoYW5kcmV3YkB1YWIu ZWR1KSANCisgKg0KKyAqLw0KKyNpZm5kZWYgX01JUFNfU0dJRUlTQV9IDQor I2RlZmluZSBfTUlQU19TR0lFSVNBX0gNCisNCisjaWZkZWYgQ09ORklHX1NH SV9FSVNBDQorZXh0ZXJuIHZvaWQgaTgyNTlfZGlzYWJsZV9pcnEodW5zaWdu ZWQgaW50KTsNCitleHRlcm4gdm9pZCBpODI1OV9lbmFibGVfaXJxKHVuc2ln bmVkIGludCk7DQorZXh0ZXJuIGludCBpODI1OV9yZXF1ZXN0X2lycSh1bnNp Z25lZCBpbnQgaXJxLA0KKwkJCSAgICAgdm9pZCAoKmhhbmRsZXIpKGludCwg dm9pZCAqLCBzdHJ1Y3QgcHRfcmVncyAqKSwNCisJCQkgICAgIHVuc2lnbmVk IGxvbmcgZmxhZ3MsDQorCQkJICAgICBjb25zdCBjaGFyICpkZXZpY2UsDQor CQkJICAgICB2b2lkICpkZXZfaWQpOw0KKw0KK2V4dGVybiB2b2lkIGk4MjU5 X2ZyZWVfaXJxKHVuc2lnbmVkIGludCBpcnEsIHZvaWQgKmRldl9pZCk7DQor DQorZXh0ZXJuIHZvaWQgaTgyNTlfZG9faXJxKGludCwgc3RydWN0IHB0X3Jl Z3MgKik7DQorDQorZXh0ZXJuIHZvaWQgaTgyNTlfaW5pdCh2b2lkKTsNCisj ZW5kaWYgLyogQ09ORklHX1NHSV9FSVNBICovDQorDQorI2VuZGlmIC8qICEo X01JUFNfU0dJRUlTQV9IKSAqLw0KLS0tIGxpbnV4L2luY2x1ZGUvYXNtLW1p cHMvc2dpZWlzYS5oLm9yaWcJVGh1IEF1ZyAyNiAxNToyNToxNSAxOTk5DQor KysgbGludXgvaW5jbHVkZS9hc20tbWlwcy9zZ2llaXNhLmgJVGh1IEF1ZyAy NiAxNjowNzozNiAxOTk5DQpAQCAtMCwwICsxLDMyIEBADQorLyogDQorICog c2dpZWlzYS5oOiBEZWZpbmVzIGZvciB0aGUgKEUpSVNBIGJ1cyBvbiB0aGUg U0dJIEluZGlnbzINCisgKg0KKyAqIENvcHlyaWdodCAoQykgMTk5OSBBbmRy ZXcgUi4gQmFrZXIgKGFuZHJld2JAdWFiLmVkdSkgDQorICoNCisgKi8NCisj aWZuZGVmIF9NSVBTX1NHSUVJU0FfSA0KKyNkZWZpbmUgX01JUFNfU0dJRUlT QV9IDQorDQorI2RlZmluZSBTR0lfRUlTQV9CQVNFIDB4MDAwODAwMDANCisN CisvKiBFSVUgcmVnaXN0ZXJzICovDQorI2RlZmluZSBTR0lfRUlVX0JBU0Ug MHgwMDA5ZmZjMA0KKw0KK3N0cnVjdCBzZ2lfZWl1X3JlZ3Mgew0KKwl2b2xh dGlsZSB1bnNpZ25lZCBsb25nIG1vZGU7DQorCXZvbGF0aWxlIHVuc2lnbmVk IGxvbmcgc3RhdHVzOw0KKwl2b2xhdGlsZSB1bnNpZ25lZCBsb25nIHByZW1w dDsNCisJdm9sYXRpbGUgdW5zaWduZWQgbG9uZyBxdWlldDsNCit9Ow0KKw0K Kw0KKyNkZWZpbmUgU0dJX0VJU0FfTk1JX0JBU0UgMHgwMDA4MDQ2MQ0KKw0K K3N0cnVjdCBzZ2lfZWlzYV9ubWlfcmVncyB7IA0KKwl2b2xhdGlsZSB1bnNp Z25lZCBjaGFyIHJlc2V0Ow0KKwl2b2xhdGlsZSB1bnNpZ25lZCBjaGFyIHBv cnQ7DQorfTsNCisNCitleHRlcm4gdm9pZCBzZ2lfZWlzYV9pbml0KHZvaWQp Ow0KKw0KKyNlbmRpZiAvKiAhKF9NSVBTX1NHSUVJU0FfSCkgKi8NCi0tLSBs aW51eC9pbmNsdWRlL2FzbS1taXBzL3NnaW50MjMuaC5vcmlnCVRodSBBdWcg MjYgMTU6Mjk6MTIgMTk5OQ0KKysrIGxpbnV4L2luY2x1ZGUvYXNtLW1pcHMv c2dpbnQyMy5oCVRodSBBdWcgMjYgMTU6Mjg6NTQgMTk5OQ0KQEAgLTIsNyAr Miw5IEBADQogICogc2dpbnQyMy5oOiBEZWZpbmVzIGZvciB0aGUgU0dJIElO VDIgYW5kIElOVDMgY2hpcHNldHMuDQogICoNCiAgKiBDb3B5cmlnaHQgKEMp IDE5OTYgRGF2aWQgUy4gTWlsbGVyIChkbUBlbmdyLnNnaS5jb20pDQotICog Q29weXJpZ2h0IChDKSAxOTk5IEFuZHJldyBSLiBCYWtlciAoYW5kcmV3YkB1 YWIuZWR1KSAtIElOVDIgY29ycmVjdGlvbnMNCisgKiBDb3B5cmlnaHQgKEMp IDE5OTkgQW5kcmV3IFIuIEJha2VyIChhbmRyZXdiQHVhYi5lZHUpIA0KKyAq IAkJLSBJTlQyIGNvcnJlY3Rpb25zDQorICogCQktIEVJU0EgYWRkaXRpb25z DQogICovDQogI2lmbmRlZiBfTUlQU19TR0lOVDIzX0gNCiAjZGVmaW5lIF9N SVBTX1NHSU5UMjNfSA0KQEAgLTEyLDEzICsxNCwxNCBAQA0KICAqIHRoYXQg cGFydGljdWxhciBJUlEgb24gYW4gU0dJIG1hY2hpbmUuICBBZGQgbmV3ICdz cGFjZXMnIGFzIG5ldw0KICAqIElSUSBoYXJkd2FyZSBpcyBzdXBwb3J0ZWQu DQogICovDQotI2RlZmluZSBTR0lOVF9MT0NBTDAgICAwICAgLyogSU5EWSBo YXMgOCBsb2NhbDAgaXJxIGxldmVscyAqLw0KLSNkZWZpbmUgU0dJTlRfTE9D QUwxICAgOCAgIC8qIElORFkgaGFzIDggbG9jYWwxIGlycSBsZXZlbHMgKi8N Ci0jZGVmaW5lIFNHSU5UX0xPQ0FMMiAgIDE2ICAvKiBJTkRZIGhhcyA4IGxv Y2FsMiB2ZWN0b3JlZCBpcnEgbGV2ZWxzICovDQotI2RlZmluZSBTR0lOVF9M T0NBTDMgICAyNCAgLyogSU5EWSBoYXMgOCBsb2NhbDMgdmVjdG9yZWQgaXJx IGxldmVscyAqLw0KLSNkZWZpbmUgU0dJTlRfR0lPICAgICAgMzIgIC8qIElO RFkgaGFzIDkgR0lPIGlycSBsZXZlbHMgKi8NCi0jZGVmaW5lIFNHSU5UX0hQ Q0RNQSAgIDQxICAvKiBJTkRZIGhhcyAxMSBIUENETUEgaXJxIF9zb3VyY2Vz XyAqLw0KLSNkZWZpbmUgU0dJTlRfRU5EICAgICAgNTIgIC8qIEVuZCBvZiAn c3BhY2VzJyAqLw0KKyNkZWZpbmUgU0dJTlRfRUlTQSAgICAgMCAgIC8qIElu ZGlnbzIgaGFzIEVJU0EgaW50ZXJydXB0cyAwLTE1ICovICANCisjZGVmaW5l IFNHSU5UX0xPQ0FMMCAgIDE2ICAvKiBJTkRZIGhhcyA4IGxvY2FsMCBpcnEg bGV2ZWxzICovDQorI2RlZmluZSBTR0lOVF9MT0NBTDEgICAyNCAgLyogSU5E WSBoYXMgOCBsb2NhbDEgaXJxIGxldmVscyAqLw0KKyNkZWZpbmUgU0dJTlRf TE9DQUwyICAgMzIgIC8qIElORFkgaGFzIDggbG9jYWwyIHZlY3RvcmVkIGly cSBsZXZlbHMgKi8NCisjZGVmaW5lIFNHSU5UX0xPQ0FMMyAgIDQwICAvKiBJ TkRZIGhhcyA4IGxvY2FsMyB2ZWN0b3JlZCBpcnEgbGV2ZWxzICovDQorI2Rl ZmluZSBTR0lOVF9HSU8gICAgICA0OCAgLyogSU5EWSBoYXMgOSBHSU8gaXJx IGxldmVscyAqLw0KKyNkZWZpbmUgU0dJTlRfSFBDRE1BICAgNTcgIC8qIElO RFkgaGFzIDExIEhQQ0RNQSBpcnEgX3NvdXJjZXNfICovDQorI2RlZmluZSBT R0lOVF9FTkQgICAgICA2OCAgLyogRW5kIG9mICdzcGFjZXMnICovDQogDQog LyogSW5kaXZpZHVhbCBpbnRlcnJ1cHQgZGVmaW5pdGlvbnMgZm9yIHRoZSBJ TkRZIGFuZCBJbmRpZ28yDQogICovDQotLS0gbGludXgvaW5pdC9tYWluLmMu b3JpZwlUaHUgQXVnIDI2IDE1OjQ0OjQ4IDE5OTkNCisrKyBsaW51eC9pbml0 L21haW4uYwlUdWUgQXVnIDI0IDEyOjI1OjQ2IDE5OTkNCkBAIC05Nyw2ICs5 NywxMCBAQA0KIGV4dGVybiB2b2lkIGVjYXJkX2luaXQodm9pZCk7DQogI2Vu ZGlmDQogDQorI2lmZGVmIENPTkZJR19TR0lfRUlTQQ0KK2V4dGVybiB2b2lk IHNnaV9laXNhX2luaXQodm9pZCk7DQorI2VuZGlmDQorDQogZXh0ZXJuIHZv aWQgc21wX3NldHVwKGNoYXIgKnN0ciwgaW50ICppbnRzKTsNCiAjaWZkZWYg X19pMzg2X18NCiBleHRlcm4gdm9pZCBpb2FwaWNfcGlycV9zZXR1cChjaGFy ICpzdHIsIGludCAqaW50cyk7DQpAQCAtODc4LDYgKzg4Miw3IEBADQogfTsN CiANCiBzdGF0aWMgc3RydWN0IGtlcm5lbF9wYXJhbSByYXdfcGFyYW1zW10g X19pbml0ZGF0YSA9IHsNCisJeyAiT1NMb2FkT3B0aW9ucz0iLCByb290X2Rl dl9zZXR1cCB9LA0KIAl7ICJyb290PSIsIHJvb3RfZGV2X3NldHVwIH0sDQog I2lmZGVmIENPTkZJR19ST09UX05GUw0KIAl7ICJuZnNyb290PSIsIG5mc19y b290X3NldHVwIH0sDQpAQCAtMTMwMyw2ICsxMzA4LDEwIEBADQogI2VuZGlm DQogI2lmZGVmIENPTkZJR19UQw0KIAl0Y19pbml0KCk7DQorI2VuZGlmDQor CQ0KKyNpZiBkZWZpbmVkKENPTkZJR19TR0lfRUlTQSkNCisJc2dpX2Vpc2Ff aW5pdCgpOw0KICNlbmRpZg0KIA0KIAkvKiBOZXR3b3JraW5nIGluaXRpYWxp emF0aW9uIG5lZWRzIGEgcHJvY2VzcyBjb250ZXh0ICovIA0KLS0tIGxpbnV4 L2FyY2gvbWlwcy9jb25maWcuaW4ub3JpZwlUaHUgQXVnIDI2IDE1OjQzOjA3 IDE5OTkNCisrKyBsaW51eC9hcmNoL21pcHMvY29uZmlnLmluCVRodSBBdWcg MjYgMTU6NDM6MTcgMTk5OQ0KQEAgLTcwLDYgKzcwLDkgQEANCiAgIGZpDQog ICBib29sICcgICBCYWNrd2FyZC1jb21wYXRpYmxlIC9wcm9jL3BjaScgQ09O RklHX1BDSV9PTERfUFJPQw0KIGZpDQoraWYgWyAiJENPTkZJR19TR0kiID0g InkiIC1hICIkQ09ORklHX0VYUEVSSU1FTlRBTCIgPSAieSIgXTsgdGhlbg0K Kwlib29sICdTR0kgKEUpSVNBIHN1cHBvcnQgKGV4cGVyaW1lbnRhbCknIENP TkZJR19TR0lfRUlTQQ0KK2ZpDQogDQogaWYgWyAiJENPTkZJR19ERUNTVEFU SU9OIiA9ICJ5IiBdOyB0aGVuDQogICBkZWZpbmVfYm9vbCBDT05GSUdfQ1BV X0xJVFRMRV9FTkRJQU4geQ0KLS0tIGxpbnV4L2FyY2gvbWlwcy9zZ2kva2Vy bmVsL01ha2VmaWxlLm9yaWcJVGh1IEF1ZyAyNiAxNTo0MDo1OCAxOTk5DQor KysgbGludXgvYXJjaC9taXBzL3NnaS9rZXJuZWwvTWFrZWZpbGUJVGh1IEF1 ZyAyNiAxNTo0MDo0MCAxOTk5DQpAQCAtMTUsOCArMTUsMTMgQEANCiANCiBP QkpTICA9IGluZHlfbWMubyBpbmR5X3NjLm8gaW5keV9ocGMubyBpbmR5X2lu dC5vIGluZHlfcnRjLm8gXA0KICAgICAgICAgc3lzdGVtLm8gaW5keV90aW1l ci5vIGluZHlJUlEubyByZXNldC5vIHNldHVwLm8gdGltZS5vDQorDQogaWZk ZWYgQ09ORklHX1NHSV9QUk9NX0NPTlNPTEUNCiBPQkpTICs9IHByb21jb24u bw0KK2VuZGlmDQorDQoraWZkZWYgQ09ORklHX1NHSV9FSVNBDQorT0JKUyAr PQllaXNhLm8gaTgyNTkubw0KIGVuZGlmDQogDQogYWxsOiBzZ2lrZXJuLmEN Ci0tLSBsaW51eC9hcmNoL21pcHMvc2dpL2tlcm5lbC9pbmR5X21jLmMub3Jp ZwlUaHUgQXVnIDI2IDE1OjM3OjA1IDE5OTkNCisrKyBsaW51eC9hcmNoL21p cHMvc2dpL2tlcm5lbC9pbmR5X21jLmMJVGh1IEF1ZyAyNiAxNjowOTowOCAx OTk5DQpAQCAtMTcsNiArMTcsOCBAQA0KIA0KIC8qICNkZWZpbmUgREVCVUdf U0dJTUMgKi8NCiANCitleHRlcm4gaW50IHNnaV9laXNhX2J1czsNCisNCiBz dHJ1Y3Qgc2dpbWNfbWlzY19jdHJsICptY21pc2NfcmVnczsNCiB1bnNpZ25l ZCBsb25nICpycHNzY291bnRlcjsNCiBzdHJ1Y3Qgc2dpbWNfZG1hX2N0cmwg KmRtYWN0cmxyZWdzOw0KQEAgLTU4LDE2ICs2MCwxNiBAQA0KIAlwcmludGso Ik1DOiBTR0kgbWVtb3J5IGNvbnRyb2xsZXIgUmV2aXNpb24gJWRcbiIsDQog CSAgICAgICAoaW50KSBtY21pc2NfcmVncy0+c3lzdGVtaWQgJiBTR0lNQ19T WVNJRF9NQVNLUkVWKTsNCiANCi0jaWYgMCAvKiBYWFggVW50aWwgSSBmaWd1 cmUgb3V0IHdoYXQgdGhpcyBiaXQgcmVhbGx5IGluZGljYXRlcyBYWFggKi8N CisJLyogWFhYIFVudGlsIEkgZmlndXJlIG91dCB3aGF0IHRoaXMgYml0IHJl YWxseSBpbmRpY2F0ZXMgWFhYICovDQorCS8qIGl0IHNob3VsZCBpbmRpY2F0 ZSB3aGV0aGVyIHdlIGhhdmUgYW4gKEUpSVNBIGJ1cyBvciBub3QgLUFuZHJl dyAqLw0KIAkvKiBYWFggSXMgdGhpcyBzeXN0ZW1pZCBiaXQgcmVsaWFibGU/ ICovDQogCWlmKG1jbWlzY19yZWdzLT5zeXN0ZW1pZCAmIFNHSU1DX1NZU0lE X0VQUkVTRU5UKSB7DQotCQlFSVNBX2J1cyA9IDE7DQorCQlzZ2lfZWlzYV9i dXMgPSAxOw0KIAkJcHJpbnRrKCJ3aXRoIEVJU0FcbiIpOw0KIAl9IGVsc2Ug ew0KLQkJRUlTQV9idXMgPSAwOw0KKwkJc2dpX2Vpc2FfYnVzID0gMDsNCiAJ CXByaW50aygibm8gRUlTQVxuIik7DQogCX0NCi0jZW5kaWYNCiANCiAjaWZk ZWYgREVCVUdfU0dJTUMNCiAJcHJvbV9wcmludGYoInNnaW1jX2luaXQ6IG1l bWNvbmZpZzA8JXM+IG1jb25maWcxPCVzPlxuIiwNCi0tLSBsaW51eC9hcmNo L21pcHMvc2dpL2tlcm5lbC9pbmR5X2ludC5jLm9yaWcJVGh1IEF1ZyAyNiAx NTozODo0MSAxOTk5DQorKysgbGludXgvYXJjaC9taXBzL3NnaS9rZXJuZWwv aW5keV9pbnQuYwlXZWQgQXVnIDI1IDE3OjIzOjI3IDE5OTkNCkBAIC04LDYg KzgsNyBAQA0KICAqIENvcHlyaWdodCAoQykgMTk5OSBBbmRyZXcgUi4gQmFr ZXIgKGFuZHJld2JAdWFiLmVkdSkgDQogICogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg IC0gSW5kaWdvMiBjaGFuZ2VzDQogICogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIC0g SW50ZXJydXB0IGhhbmRsaW5nIGZpeGVzDQorICogICAgICAgICAgICAgICAg ICAgIC0gRUlTQSBzdXBwb3J0DQogICovDQogI2luY2x1ZGUgPGxpbnV4L2Nv bmZpZy5oPg0KICNpbmNsdWRlIDxsaW51eC9pbml0Lmg+DQpAQCAtNDAsNiAr NDEsMTAgQEANCiAjaW5jbHVkZSA8YXNtL3NnaWFsaWIuaD4NCiAjaW5jbHVk ZSA8YXNtL2dkYi1zdHViLmg+DQogDQorI2lmZGVmIENPTkZJR19TR0lfRUlT QQ0KKyAgI2luY2x1ZGUgPGFzbS9zZ2llaXNhLmg+DQorI2VuZGlmDQorDQog LyogI2RlZmluZSBERUJVR19TR0lOVCAqLw0KIA0KIHN0cnVjdCBzZ2lfaW50 Ml9yZWdzICpzZ2lfaTJyZWdzOw0KQEAgLTE0NiwxNCArMTUxLDIwIEBADQog CQlwcmludGsoIndoZWUsIGludmFsaWQgaXJxX25yICVkXG4iLCBpcnFfbnIp Ow0KIAkJcGFuaWMoIklSUSwgeW91IGxvc2UuLi4iKTsNCiAJfQ0KLQlpZihu ID49IFNHSU5UX0xPQ0FMMCAmJiBuIDwgU0dJTlRfR0lPKSB7DQorCWlmKG4g Pj0gU0dJTlRfRUlTQSAmJiBuIDwgU0dJTlRfTE9DQUwwKSB7DQorI2lmZGVm IENPTkZJR19TR0lfRUlTQQ0KKwkJaTgyNTlfZGlzYWJsZV9pcnEobiAtIFNH SU5UX0VJU0EpOw0KKyNlbHNlDQorCQlwcmludGsoIk5vIChFKUlTQSBzdXBw b3J0LiIpOw0KKyNlbmRpZg0KKwl9IGVsc2UgaWYobiA+PSBTR0lOVF9MT0NB TDAgJiYgbiA8IFNHSU5UX0dJTykgew0KIAkJZGlzYWJsZV9sb2NhbF9pcnEo biAtIFNHSU5UX0xPQ0FMMCk7DQogCX0gZWxzZSBpZihuID49IFNHSU5UX0dJ TyAmJiBuIDwgU0dJTlRfSFBDRE1BKSB7DQogCQlkaXNhYmxlX2dpb19pcnEo biAtIFNHSU5UX0dJTyk7DQogCX0gZWxzZSBpZihuID49IFNHSU5UX0hQQ0RN QSAmJiBuIDwgU0dJTlRfRU5EKSB7DQogCQlkaXNhYmxlX2hwY2RtYV9pcnEo biAtIFNHSU5UX0hQQ0RNQSk7DQogCX0gZWxzZSB7DQotCQlwYW5pYygiaG93 IGRpZCBJIGdldCBoZXJlPyIpOw0KKwkJcGFuaWMoImhvdyBkaWQgSSBnZXQg aGVyZT8gKCVpKSIsIGlycV9ucik7DQogCX0NCiB9DQogDQpAQCAtMTY0LDE0 ICsxNzUsMjAgQEANCiAJCXByaW50aygid2hlZSwgaW52YWxpZCBpcnFfbnIg JWRcbiIsIGlycV9ucik7DQogCQlwYW5pYygiSVJRLCB5b3UgbG9zZS4uLiIp Ow0KIAl9DQotCWlmKG4gPj0gU0dJTlRfTE9DQUwwICYmIG4gPCBTR0lOVF9H SU8pIHsNCisJaWYobiA+PSBTR0lOVF9FSVNBICYmIG4gPCBTR0lOVF9MT0NB TDApIHsNCisjaWZkZWYgQ09ORklHX1NHSV9FSVNBDQorCQlpODI1OV9lbmFi bGVfaXJxKG4gLSBTR0lOVF9FSVNBKTsNCisjZWxzZQ0KKwkJcHJpbnRrKCJO byAoRSlJU0Egc3VwcG9ydC5cbiIpOw0KKyNlbmRpZg0KKwl9IGlmKG4gPj0g U0dJTlRfTE9DQUwwICYmIG4gPCBTR0lOVF9HSU8pIHsNCiAJCWVuYWJsZV9s b2NhbF9pcnEobiAtIFNHSU5UX0xPQ0FMMCk7DQogCX0gZWxzZSBpZihuID49 IFNHSU5UX0dJTyAmJiBuIDwgU0dJTlRfSFBDRE1BKSB7DQogCQllbmFibGVf Z2lvX2lycShuIC0gU0dJTlRfR0lPKTsNCiAJfSBlbHNlIGlmKG4gPj0gU0dJ TlRfSFBDRE1BICYmIG4gPCBTR0lOVF9FTkQpIHsNCiAJCWVuYWJsZV9ocGNk bWFfaXJxKG4gLSBTR0lOVF9IUENETUEpOw0KIAl9IGVsc2Ugew0KLQkJcGFu aWMoImhvdyBkaWQgSSBnZXQgaGVyZT8iKTsNCisJCXBhbmljKCJob3cgZGlk IEkgZ2V0IGhlcmU/ICglaSkiLCBpcnFfbnIpOw0KIAl9DQogfQ0KIA0KQEAg LTM1NSw2ICszNzIsNyBAQA0KIAlrZnJlZShhY3Rpb24pOw0KIH0NCiANCisN CiBpbnQgcmVxdWVzdF9pcnEodW5zaWduZWQgaW50IGlycSwgDQogCQl2b2lk ICgqaGFuZGxlcikoaW50LCB2b2lkICosIHN0cnVjdCBwdF9yZWdzICopLA0K IAkJdW5zaWduZWQgbG9uZyBpcnFmbGFncywgDQpAQCAtMzY4LDcgKzM4Niwx NiBAQA0KIAkJcmV0dXJuIC1FSU5WQUw7DQogCWlmICghaGFuZGxlcikNCiAJ CXJldHVybiAtRUlOVkFMOw0KLQ0KKwkNCisJaWYoKGlycSA+PSBTR0lOVF9F SVNBKSAmJiAoaXJxIDwgU0dJTlRfTE9DQUwwKSkNCisjaWZkZWYgQ09ORklH X1NHSV9FSVNBDQorCQlyZXR1cm4gaTgyNTlfcmVxdWVzdF9pcnEoaXJxLCBo YW5kbGVyLCBpcnFmbGFncywgZGV2bmFtZSwgZGV2X2lkKTsNCisjZWxzZQ0K Kwl7DQorCQlwcmludGsoIk5vIChFKUlTQSBzdXBwb3J0LiIpOw0KKwkJcmV0 dXJuIC1FSU5WQUw7DQorCX0NCisjZW5kaWYNCiAJaWYoKGlycSA+PSBTR0lO VF9MT0NBTDApICYmIChpcnEgPCBTR0lOVF9HSU8pKQ0KIAkJcmV0dXJuIHJl cXVlc3RfbG9jYWxfaXJxKGlycSwgaGFuZGxlciwgaXJxZmxhZ3MsIGRldm5h bWUsIGRldl9pZCk7DQogDQpAQCAtMzk3LDYgKzQyNCwxNCBAQA0KIA0KIAlp ZiAoaXJxID49IFNHSU5UX0VORCkgew0KIAkJcHJpbnRrKCJUcnlpbmcgdG8g ZnJlZSBJUlElZFxuIixpcnEpOw0KKwkJcmV0dXJuOw0KKwl9DQorCWlmKChp cnEgPj0gU0dJTlRfRUlTQSkgJiYgKGlycSA8U0dJTlRfTE9DQUwwKSkgew0K KyNpZmRlZiBDT05GSUdfU0dJX0VJU0ENCisJCWk4MjU5X2ZyZWVfaXJxKGly cSwgZGV2X2lkKTsNCisjZWxzZQ0KKwkJcHJpbnRrKCJObyAoRSlJU0Egc3Vw cG9ydC5cbiIpOw0KKyNlbmRpZg0KIAkJcmV0dXJuOw0KIAl9DQogCWlmKChp cnEgPj0gU0dJTlRfTE9DQUwwKSAmJiAoaXJxIDwgU0dJTlRfR0lPKSkgew0K LS0tIGxpbnV4L2FyY2gvbWlwcy9zZ2kva2VybmVsL2k4MjU5LmMub3JpZwlU aHUgQXVnIDI2IDE1OjM2OjMwIDE5OTkNCisrKyBsaW51eC9hcmNoL21pcHMv c2dpL2tlcm5lbC9pODI1OS5jCVRodSBBdWcgMjYgMTU6NDg6MzMgMTk5OQ0K QEAgLTAsMCArMSwyNTMgQEANCisvKg0KKyAqDQorICogaTgyNTkuYzogIEdl bmVyaWMgc3VwcG9ydCBmb3IgdGhlIGk4MjU5IFBJQw0KKyAqDQorICogQ29k ZSBjb3BpZWQgZnJvbSBhcmNoL21pcHMva2VybmVsL2lycS5jIHdpdGggbWlu b3IgY2hhbmdlcy4NCisgKg0KKyAqICBUaGlzIHNob3VsZCByZWFsbHkgZ28g aW50byBzb21lIGFyY2hpdGVjdHVyZSBpbmRlcGVuZGVudCBwbGFjZQ0KKyAq Lw0KKw0KKyNpbmNsdWRlIDxsaW51eC9lcnJuby5oPg0KKyNpbmNsdWRlIDxs aW51eC9pbml0Lmg+DQorI2luY2x1ZGUgPGxpbnV4L2tlcm5lbC5oPg0KKyNp bmNsdWRlIDxsaW51eC9rZXJuZWxfc3RhdC5oPg0KKyNpbmNsdWRlIDxsaW51 eC9zY2hlZC5oPg0KKyNpbmNsdWRlIDxsaW51eC9pbnRlcnJ1cHQuaD4NCisj aW5jbHVkZSA8bGludXgvbWFsbG9jLmg+DQorI2luY2x1ZGUgPGxpbnV4L3Jh bmRvbS5oPg0KKw0KKyNpbmNsdWRlIDxhc20vaW8uaD4NCisjaW5jbHVkZSA8 YXNtL3B0cmFjZS5oPg0KKyNpbmNsdWRlIDxhc20vc2dpbnQyMy5oPg0KKyNp bmNsdWRlIDxhc20vaTgyNTkuaD4NCisNCisvKg0KKyAqIFRoaXMgY29udGFp bnMgdGhlIGlycSBtYXNrIGZvciBib3RoIDgyNTlBIGlycSBjb250cm9sbGVy cywgaXQncyBhbg0KKyAqIGludCBzbyB3ZSBjYW4gZGVhbCB3aXRoIHRoZSB0 aGlyZCBQSUMgaW4gc29tZSBzeXN0ZW1zIGxpa2UgdGhlIFJNMzAwLg0KKyAq Lw0KKw0KK3N0YXRpYyB1bnNpZ25lZCBpbnQgY2FjaGVkX2lycV9tYXNrID0g MHhmZmZiOw0KKw0KKyNkZWZpbmUgX19ieXRlKHgseSkgKCgodW5zaWduZWQg Y2hhciAqKSYoeSkpW3hdKQ0KKy8vI2RlZmluZSBfX3dvcmQoeCx5KSAoKCh1 bnNpZ25lZCBzaG9ydCAqKSYoeSkpW3hdKQ0KKy8vI2RlZmluZSBfX2xvbmco eCx5KSAoKCh1bnNpZ25lZCBpbnQgKikmKHkpKVt4XSkNCisNCisvKiBUaGVz ZSBhcmUgZm9yIGJpZyBlbmRpYW4gbWFjaGluZXMgKi8NCisjZGVmaW5lIGNh Y2hlZF8yMSAgICAgICAoX19ieXRlKDMsY2FjaGVkX2lycV9tYXNrKSkNCisj ZGVmaW5lIGNhY2hlZF9BMSAgICAgICAoX19ieXRlKDIsY2FjaGVkX2lycV9t YXNrKSkNCisNCitzdGF0aWMgc3RydWN0IGlycWFjdGlvbiAqaTgyNTlfaXJx X2FjdGlvblsxNl0gPSB7DQorCU5VTEwsIE5VTEwsIE5VTEwsIE5VTEwsIE5V TEwsIE5VTEwsIE5VTEwsIE5VTEwsDQorCU5VTEwsIE5VTEwsIE5VTEwsIE5V TEwsIE5VTEwsIE5VTEwsIE5VTEwsIE5VTEwNCit9Ow0KKw0KK3N0YXRpYyBp bmxpbmUgdm9pZCBpODI1OV9tYXNrX2lycSh1bnNpZ25lZCBpbnQgaXJxKQ0K K3sNCisJY2FjaGVkX2lycV9tYXNrIHw9IDEgPDwgaXJxOw0KKwlpZiAoaXJx ICYgOCkgew0KKwkJb3V0YihjYWNoZWRfQTEsIDB4YTEpOw0KKwl9IGVsc2Ug ew0KKwkJb3V0YihjYWNoZWRfMjEsIDB4MjEpOw0KKwl9DQorfQ0KKw0KK3N0 YXRpYyBpbmxpbmUgdm9pZCBpODI1OV91bm1hc2tfaXJxKHVuc2lnbmVkIGlu dCBpcnEpDQorew0KKyAgICAgICAgY2FjaGVkX2lycV9tYXNrICY9IH4oMSA8 PCBpcnEpOw0KKyAgICAgICAgaWYgKGlycSAmIDgpIHsNCisJCW91dGIoY2Fj aGVkX0ExLCAweGExKTsNCisgICAgICAgIH0gZWxzZSB7DQorCQlvdXRiKGNh Y2hlZF8yMSwgMHgyMSk7DQorCX0NCit9DQorDQorDQoraW50IGk4MjU5X3Nl dHVwX2lycShpbnQgaXJxLCBzdHJ1Y3QgaXJxYWN0aW9uICogbmV3KQ0KK3sN CisJaW50IHNoYXJlZCA9IDA7DQorCXN0cnVjdCBpcnFhY3Rpb24gKm9sZCwg KipwOw0KKwl1bnNpZ25lZCBsb25nIGZsYWdzOw0KKw0KKwlwID0gaTgyNTlf aXJxX2FjdGlvbiArIGlycTsNCisJaWYgKChvbGQgPSAqcCkgIT0gTlVMTCkg ew0KKwkJLyogQ2FuJ3Qgc2hhcmUgaW50ZXJydXB0cyB1bmxlc3MgYm90aCBh Z3JlZSB0byAqLw0KKwkJaWYgKCEob2xkLT5mbGFncyAmIG5ldy0+ZmxhZ3Mg JiBTQV9TSElSUSkpDQorCQkJcmV0dXJuIC1FQlVTWTsNCisNCisJCS8qIENh bid0IHNoYXJlIGludGVycnVwdHMgdW5sZXNzIGJvdGggYXJlIHRoZSBzYW1l IHR5cGUgKi8NCisJCWlmICgob2xkLT5mbGFncyBeIG5ldy0+ZmxhZ3MpICYg U0FfSU5URVJSVVBUKQ0KKwkJCXJldHVybiAtRUJVU1k7DQorCQ0KKwkJLyog YWRkIG5ldyBpbnRlcnJ1cHQgYXQgZW5kIG9mIGlycSBxdWV1ZSAqLw0KKwkJ ZG8gew0KKwkJCXAgPSAmIG9sZC0+bmV4dDsNCisJCQlvbGQgPSAqcDsNCisJ CX0gd2hpbGUgKG9sZCk7DQorCQlzaGFyZWQgPSAxOw0KKwl9DQorDQorCWlm IChuZXctPmZsYWdzICYgU0FfU0FNUExFX1JBTkRPTSkNCisJCXJhbmRfaW5p dGlhbGl6ZV9pcnEoaXJxKTsNCisNCisJc2F2ZV9hbmRfY2xpKGZsYWdzKTsN CisJKnAgPSBuZXc7DQorDQorCWlmICghc2hhcmVkKSB7DQorCQlpODI1OV91 bm1hc2tfaXJxKGlycSk7DQorCX0NCisJcmVzdG9yZV9mbGFncyhmbGFncyk7 DQorCXJldHVybiAwOw0KK30NCisNCisNCisvKiBlbmFibGUgYW5kIGRpc2Fi bGUgZm9yIEVJU0EgaXJxcyAqLw0KKw0KK3ZvaWQgaTgyNTlfZGlzYWJsZV9p cnEodW5zaWduZWQgaW50IGlycV9ucikNCit7DQorCXVuc2lnbmVkIGxvbmcg ZmxhZ3M7DQorDQorCXNhdmVfYW5kX2NsaShmbGFncyk7DQorCWk4MjU5X21h c2tfaXJxKGlycV9ucik7DQorCXJlc3RvcmVfZmxhZ3MoZmxhZ3MpOw0KK30N CisNCit2b2lkIGk4MjU5X2VuYWJsZV9pcnEodW5zaWduZWQgaW50IGlycV9u cikNCit7DQorCXVuc2lnbmVkIGxvbmcgZmxhZ3M7DQorDQorCXNhdmVfYW5k X2NsaShmbGFncyk7DQorCWk4MjU5X3VubWFza19pcnEoaXJxX25yKTsNCisJ cmVzdG9yZV9mbGFncyhmbGFncyk7DQorfQ0KKw0KKw0KK2ludCBpODI1OV9y ZXF1ZXN0X2lycSh1bnNpZ25lZCBpbnQgaXJxLCANCisJCSAgICAgIHZvaWQg KCpoYW5kbGVyKShpbnQsIHZvaWQgKiwgc3RydWN0IHB0X3JlZ3MgKiksDQor ICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIHVuc2lnbmVkIGxvbmcgZmxhZ3MsIA0K KwkJICAgICAgY29uc3QgY2hhciAqZGV2aWNlLCANCisJCSAgICAgIHZvaWQg KmRldl9pZCkNCit7DQorCWludCByZXR2YWw7DQorCXN0cnVjdCBpcnFhY3Rp b24gKmFjdGlvbjsNCisJDQorCS8qIFdlIG9ubHkgaGF2ZSAwLTE1IGZvciAo RSlJU0EgaXJxcyAqLw0KKwlpZiAoaXJxID49IDE2KQ0KKwkJcmV0dXJuIC1F SU5WQUw7DQorCWlmICghaGFuZGxlcikNCisJCXJldHVybiAtRUlOVkFMOw0K Kw0KKwlhY3Rpb24gPSAoc3RydWN0IGlycWFjdGlvbiAqKWttYWxsb2Moc2l6 ZW9mKHN0cnVjdCBpcnFhY3Rpb24pLCBHRlBfS0VSTkVMKTsNCisJaWYgKCFh Y3Rpb24pDQorCQlyZXR1cm4gLUVOT01FTTsNCisNCisJYWN0aW9uLT5oYW5k bGVyID0gaGFuZGxlcjsNCisJYWN0aW9uLT5mbGFncyA9IGZsYWdzOw0KKwlh Y3Rpb24tPm1hc2sgPSAwOw0KKwlhY3Rpb24tPm5hbWUgPSBkZXZpY2U7DQor CWFjdGlvbi0+bmV4dCA9IE5VTEw7DQorCWFjdGlvbi0+ZGV2X2lkID0gZGV2 X2lkOw0KKw0KKwlyZXR2YWwgPSBpODI1OV9zZXR1cF9pcnEoaXJxLCBhY3Rp b24pOw0KKw0KKwlpZiAocmV0dmFsKQ0KKwkJa2ZyZWUoYWN0aW9uKTsNCisJ cmV0dXJuIHJldHZhbDsNCit9DQorDQordm9pZCBpODI1OV9mcmVlX2lycSh1 bnNpZ25lZCBpbnQgaXJxLCB2b2lkICpkZXZfaWQpDQorew0KKwlzdHJ1Y3Qg aXJxYWN0aW9uICphY3Rpb24sICoqcDsNCisJdW5zaWduZWQgbG9uZyBmbGFn czsNCisNCisJaWYgKCBpcnEgPiAxNSkgeyANCisJCXByaW50aygiVHJ5aW5n IHRvIGZyZWUgKEUpSVNBIElSUSVkXG4iLCBpcnEpOw0KKwkJcmV0dXJuOw0K Kwl9DQorCWZvciAocCA9IGlycSArIGk4MjU5X2lycV9hY3Rpb247IChhY3Rp b24gPSAqcCkgIT0gTlVMTDsgcCA9ICZhY3Rpb24tPm5leHQpIHsNCisJCWlm IChhY3Rpb24tPmRldl9pZCAhPSBkZXZfaWQpDQorCQkJY29udGludWU7DQor DQorCQkvKiBGb3VuZCBpdCAtIG5vdyBmcmVlIGl0ICovDQorCQlzYXZlX2Fu ZF9jbGkoZmxhZ3MpOw0KKwkJKnAgPSBhY3Rpb24tPm5leHQ7DQorCQlpZiAo IWlycVtpODI1OV9pcnFfYWN0aW9uXSkNCisJCQlpODI1OV9tYXNrX2lycShp cnEpOw0KKwkJcmVzdG9yZV9mbGFncyhmbGFncyk7DQorCQlrZnJlZShhY3Rp b24pOw0KKwkJcmV0dXJuOw0KKwl9DQorCXByaW50aygiVHJ5aW5nIHRvIGZy ZWUgZnJlZSAoRSlJU0EgSVJRJWRcbiIsIGlycSk7DQorfQ0KKw0KK3N0YXRp YyBpbmxpbmUgdm9pZCBpODI1OV9tYXNrX2FuZF9hY2tfaXJxKGludCBpcnEp DQorew0KKwljYWNoZWRfaXJxX21hc2sgfD0gMSA8PCBpcnE7DQorCWlmIChp cnEgJiA4KSB7DQorCQlpbmIoMHhhMSk7DQorCQlvdXRiKGNhY2hlZF9BMSwg MHhhMSk7DQorCQlvdXRiKDB4NjIsIDB4MjApOyAgICAgICAgICAgICAgIC8q IFNwZWNpZmljIEVPSSB0byBjYXNjYWRlICovDQorCQlvdXRiKDB4MjAsIDB4 YTApOw0KKwl9IGVsc2Ugew0KKwkJaW5iKDB4MjEpOw0KKwkJb3V0YihjYWNo ZWRfMjEsIDB4MjEpOw0KKwkJb3V0YigweDIwLCAweDIwKTsNCisJfQ0KK30N CisNCisNCithc21saW5rYWdlIHZvaWQgaTgyNTlfZG9faXJxKGludCBpcnEs IHN0cnVjdCBwdF9yZWdzICpyZWdzKQ0KK3sNCisJc3RydWN0IGlycWFjdGlv biAqYWN0aW9uOw0KKwlpbnQgZG9fcmFuZG9tLCBjcHU7DQorDQorCWNwdSA9 IHNtcF9wcm9jZXNzb3JfaWQoKTsNCisJaGFyZGlycV9lbnRlcihjcHUpOw0K Kw0KKwlpZiAoaXJxID49IDE2KQ0KKwkJZ290byBvdXQ7DQorDQorCWk4MjU5 X21hc2tfYW5kX2Fja19pcnEoaXJxKTsNCisNCisJa3N0YXQuaXJxc1tjcHVd W2lycV0rKzsNCisNCisJYWN0aW9uID0gKihpcnEgKyBpODI1OV9pcnFfYWN0 aW9uKTsNCisJaWYgKCFhY3Rpb24pDQorCQlnb3RvIG91dDsNCisNCisJaWYg KCEoYWN0aW9uLT5mbGFncyAmIFNBX0lOVEVSUlVQVCkpDQorCQlfX3N0aSgp Ow0KKwlhY3Rpb24gPSAqKGlycSArIGk4MjU5X2lycV9hY3Rpb24pOw0KKwlk b19yYW5kb20gPSAwOw0KKwlkbyB7DQorCQlkb19yYW5kb20gfD0gYWN0aW9u LT5mbGFnczsNCisJCWFjdGlvbi0+aGFuZGxlcihpcnEsIGFjdGlvbi0+ZGV2 X2lkLCByZWdzKTsNCisJCWFjdGlvbiA9IGFjdGlvbi0+bmV4dDsNCisJfSB3 aGlsZSAoYWN0aW9uKTsNCisJaWYgKGRvX3JhbmRvbSAmIFNBX1NBTVBMRV9S QU5ET00pDQorCQlhZGRfaW50ZXJydXB0X3JhbmRvbW5lc3MoaXJxKTsNCisJ X19jbGkoKTsNCisJaTgyNTlfdW5tYXNrX2lycSAoaXJxKTsNCisNCitvdXQ6 DQorCWhhcmRpcnFfZXhpdChjcHUpOw0KK30JDQorDQorX19pbml0ZnVuYyh2 b2lkIGk4MjU5X2luaXQodm9pZCkpDQorew0KKwkvKiBJbml0IG1hc3RlciBp bnRlcnJ1cHQgY29udHJvbGxlciAqLw0KKwlvdXRiKDB4MTEsICgweDIwKSk7 IC8qIFN0YXJ0IGluaXQgc2VxdWVuY2UgKi8NCisJb3V0YigweDAwLCAoMHgy MSkpOyAvKiBWZWN0b3IgYmFzZSAqLw0KKwlvdXRiKDB4MDQsICgweDIxKSk7 IC8qIGVkZ2UgdGlnZ2VyZWQsIENhc2NhZGUgKHNsYXZlKSBvbiBJUlEyICov DQorCW91dGIoMHgwMSwgKDB4MjEpKTsgLyogU2VsZWN0IDgwODYgbW9kZSAq Lw0KKwlvdXRiKDB4ZmYsICgweDIxKSk7IC8qIE1hc2sgYWxsICovDQorDQor CS8qIEluaXQgc2xhdmUgaW50ZXJydXB0IGNvbnRyb2xsZXIgKi8NCisJb3V0 YigweDExLCAoMHhhMCkpOyAvKiBTdGFydCBpbml0IHNlcXVlbmNlICovDQor CW91dGIoMHgwOCwgKDB4YTEpKTsgLyogVmVjdG9yIGJhc2UgKi8NCisJb3V0 YigweDAyLCAoMHhhMSkpOyAvKiBlZGdlIHRyaWdnZXJlZCwgQ2FzY2FkZSAo c2xhdmUpIG9uIElSUTIgKi8NCisJb3V0YigweDAxLCAoMHhhMSkpOyAvKiBT ZWxlY3QgODA4NiBtb2RlICovDQorCW91dGIoMHhmZiwgKDB4YTEpKTsgLyog TWFzayBhbGwgKi8NCisNCisJb3V0YihjYWNoZWRfQTEsICgweGExKSk7DQor CW91dGIoY2FjaGVkXzIxLCAoMHgyMSkpOw0KK30NCi0tLSBsaW51eC9hcmNo L21pcHMvc2dpL2tlcm5lbC9laXNhLmMub3JpZwlUaHUgQXVnIDI2IDE1OjM2 OjI0IDE5OTkNCisrKyBsaW51eC9hcmNoL21pcHMvc2dpL2tlcm5lbC9laXNh LmMJVGh1IEF1ZyAyNiAxNjoxMjowNCAxOTk5DQpAQCAtMCwwICsxLDcwIEBA DQorLyoNCisgKg0KKyAqIGVpc2EuYzogIFN1cHBvcnQgZm9yIHRoZSAoRSlJ U0EgYnVzIGZvdW5kIG9uIHRoZSBJbmRpZ28yDQorICoNCisgKiBDb3B5cmln aHQgKEMpIDE5OTkgQW5kcmV3IFIuIEJha2VyIChhbmRyZXdiQHVhYi5lZHUp DQorICoNCisgKi8NCisNCisjaW5jbHVkZSA8bGludXgvZXJybm8uaD4NCisj aW5jbHVkZSA8bGludXgvaW5pdC5oPg0KKyNpbmNsdWRlIDxsaW51eC9rZXJu ZWwuaD4NCisjaW5jbHVkZSA8bGludXgva2VybmVsX3N0YXQuaD4NCisjaW5j bHVkZSA8bGludXgvc2NoZWQuaD4NCisjaW5jbHVkZSA8bGludXgvaW50ZXJy dXB0Lmg+DQorI2luY2x1ZGUgPGxpbnV4L21hbGxvYy5oPg0KKyNpbmNsdWRl IDxsaW51eC9yYW5kb20uaD4NCisNCisjaW5jbHVkZSA8YXNtL2lvLmg+DQor I2luY2x1ZGUgPGFzbS9wdHJhY2UuaD4NCisjaW5jbHVkZSA8YXNtL3NnaW50 MjMuaD4NCisjaW5jbHVkZSA8YXNtL3NnaWVpc2EuaD4NCisjaW5jbHVkZSA8 YXNtL2k4MjU5Lmg+DQorDQorc3RydWN0IHNnaV9laXVfcmVncyAqc2dpX2Vp dTsNCitpbnQgc2dpX2Vpc2FfYnVzID0gMDsNCisNCitzdGF0aWMgdm9pZCBl aXNhX2ludChpbnQgaXJxLCB2b2lkICpkZXZfaWQsIHN0cnVjdCBwdF9yZWdz ICpyZWdzKQ0KK3sNCisJLyogd2hpY2ggKEUpSVNBIGludGVycnVwdCBkaWQg d2UgZ2V0PyAqLw0KKwlpbnQgZWlzYV9pcnEgPSBpbmIoMHgxMDAwNCk7DQor CS8qIGZpbmQgb3V0IHdoaWNoIEVJU0EgaXJxIHdlIGdvdCBhbmQgY2FsbCBp ODI1OV9kb19pcnEgKi8NCisJaTgyNTlfZG9faXJxKGVpc2FfaXJxLCByZWdz KTsNCit9DQorDQordm9pZCBlaXNhX3Jlc2V0KHZvaWQpDQorew0KKwlpbnQg aTsNCisJb3V0YigweDEsIDB4NDYxKTsNCisJLyogd2FpdCAqLw0KKwlmb3Ig KGkgPSAwIDsgaSA8IDEwMDAgOyBpKyspDQorCQk7DQorCW91dGIoMHgwLCAw eDQ2MSk7DQorfQ0KKw0KKw0KK19faW5pdGZ1bmModm9pZCBzZ2lfZWlzYV9p bml0KHZvaWQpKQ0KK3sNCisJaWYoc2dpX2Vpc2FfYnVzKSANCisJew0KKwkJ cHJpbnRrKCJJbml0aWFsaXppbmcgdGhlIChFKUlTQSBzdWJzeXN0ZW0uXG4i KTsNCisNCisJCS8qIHNldHVwIHRoZSBFSVUgKi8NCisJCXNnaV9laXUgPSAo c3RydWN0IHNnaV9laXVfcmVncyAqKSAoS1NFRzEgKyBTR0lfRUlVX0JBU0Up Ow0KKwkJc2dpX2VpdS0+cHJlbXB0ID0gMHhmZmZmOw0KKwkJc2dpX2VpdS0+ cXVpZXQgPSAweDE7DQorCQlzZ2lfZWl1LT5tb2RlID0gMHg0MGYzYzA3ZjsN CisNCisJCS8qIHNldCB0aGUgSS9PIGJhc2UgKi8NCisJCW1pcHNfaW9fcG9y dF9iYXNlID0gS1NFRzEgfCBTR0lfRUlTQV9CQVNFOw0KKw0KKwkJLyogcmVz ZXQgdGhlIGJ1cyAqLw0KKwkJZWlzYV9yZXNldCgpOw0KKwkNCisJCS8qIHNl dHVwIHRoZSBpODI1OSBpbnRlcnJ1cHQgY29udHJvbGxlcnMgKi8NCisJCWk4 MjU5X2luaXQoKTsNCisJCQ0KKwkJLyogcmVnaXN0ZXIgdGhlIEVJU0EgYnVz IGludGVycnVwdCBoYW5kbGVyICovDQorCQlyZXF1ZXN0X2lycShTR0lfRUlT QV9JUlEsIGVpc2FfaW50LCAwLCAiRUlTQSBCdXMiLCBOVUxMKTsNCisJfQ0K K30NCg== --445303055-905674700-935702266=:17792-- From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Fri Aug 27 00:39:58 1999 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id AAA23866 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 00:39:55 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id PAA04890; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 15:34:43 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id PAA87301 for linux-list; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 15:28:25 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id PAA43060 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 15:28:19 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (cory@real-time.com) Received: from paladin.real-time.com (paladin.real-time.com [206.10.252.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id PAA00216 for ; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 15:28:14 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (cory@real-time.com) Received: from real-time.com (mondas.dalekchess.org [206.147.104.202]) by paladin.real-time.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id RAA25535; Thu, 26 Aug 1999 17:27:47 -0500 (CDT) Message-ID: <37C5BE0E.54A71DC6@real-time.com> Date: Thu, 26 Aug 1999 17:22:07 -0500 From: Cory Jon Hollingsworth X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.6 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.2.9 i586) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Jens Oeser CC: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Booting linux does not work fine. References: <37C4F2A9.543E0E98@darmstadt.gmd.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1092 Lines: 31 Jens Oeser wrote: > Hi! > > I tried to install linux to my sgi indy yesterday, kernel starts up > normally and hangs after "Freeing unused kernel memory 44k freed". Then > i only can reboot the machine. I really don't find the thing causing > that, maybe someone can give me an advise to get linux to work fine. > Hardware: > ip22 175mhz > 64/128mb ram (Depends which machine) > 2gb hdd (2nd machine 2x1GB). > hinv says that i have a indy 24bit ... does this card is supported? I > think so, because kernel messages are printed on the screen, so entire > linux should do so. > So how can i get linux working? > > regards. > Jens Oeser I had the same problem when I installed Linux on my Tandem, an Indy like machine. You might want to try one of the kernels from ftp.linux.sgi.com/pub/linux/mips/test. I had good luck with vmlinux-indy-2.2.1-990329 which apparently fixes this problem for some of the R4400 CPU based systems. Just replace vmlinux in the NFS partition or boop directory, depending on how you are doing the install, with this new vmlinux-whatever. Good luck. From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Fri Aug 27 09:54:11 1999 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id JAA28684 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 09:54:05 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id AAA00205; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 00:48:12 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id AAA58947 for linux-list; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 00:38:37 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id AAA95701 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 00:38:26 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (mreckt@wjpserver.CS.Uni-SB.DE) Received: from uni-sb.de (uni-sb.de [134.96.252.33]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id AAA01884 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 00:38:23 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (mreckt@wjpserver.CS.Uni-SB.DE) Received: from cs.uni-sb.de (cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.252.31]) by uni-sb.de (8.9.3/1999070600) with ESMTP id JAA23356 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 09:38:17 +0200 (CEST) Received: from wjpserver.cs.uni-sb.de (wjpserver.cs.uni-sb.de [134.96.247.42]) by cs.uni-sb.de (8.9.3/1999031900) with ESMTP id JAA07955 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 09:38:16 +0200 (CEST) Received: from vodix.cs.uni-sb.de (vodix [134.96.247.43]) by wjpserver.cs.uni-sb.de (8.9.3/8.9.3/wjp-SVR4/1999052600) with ESMTP id JAA23924 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 09:38:15 +0200 (MET DST) Received: by vodix.cs.uni-sb.de; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 09:38:15 +0200 (MET DST) To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: IndyCam? Mime-Version: 1.0 (generated by tm-edit 7.108) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII From: Martin Recktenwald Date: 27 Aug 1999 09:38:15 +0200 Message-ID: X-Mailer: Gnus v5.6.45/XEmacs 21.1 - "20 Minutes to Nikko" Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Length: 102 Lines: 6 Hi, is it possible to get pictures from an IndyCam attached to a SGI Indy running Linux? Martin. From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Fri Aug 27 12:10:28 1999 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA21014 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 12:10:26 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id DAA08185; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 03:03:26 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id CAA64264 for linux-list; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 02:54:38 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id CAA86361 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 02:54:33 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (oeser@darmstadt.gmd.de) Received: from sonne.darmstadt.gmd.de (sonne.darmstadt.gmd.de [141.12.62.20]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id CAA07103 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 02:54:09 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (oeser@darmstadt.gmd.de) Received: from darmstadt.gmd.de (VaX@pc-dime [141.12.60.3]) by sonne.darmstadt.gmd.de (8.8.8/8.8.5) with ESMTP id LAA00970 for ; Fri, 27 Aug 1999 11:54:05 +0200 (MET DST) Message-ID: <37C6618F.8FFA2D80@darmstadt.gmd.de> Date: Fri, 27 Aug 1999 11:59:43 +0200 From: Jens Oeser X-Mailer: Mozilla 4.5 [en] (X11; I; Linux 2.0.36 i686) X-Accept-Language: en MIME-Version: 1.0 To: linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Subject: Re: Booting linux does not work fine. References: <37C4F2A9.543E0E98@darmstadt.gmd.de> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 1384 Lines: 43 Hi! I got it working now, with vmlinux-r4400 ... other kernels are booting but kflushd messes up my screen. The kflush always want to tell me when he flushes something ... i really would have the sound kernel, but i cannot use it because of kflushd trouble, anyone expierences with that? I modified syslog.conf, but it doesn't work. Seems to be direct from the kernel. I try i selfcompiled kernel today, maybe this helps me. Another problem, If i try to add a swap partition, it only get's a size of 20mb with fx, if i resize, the partition is not longer recognized as swap, and the hardhat install program does not let me make it to a swap. Is there i way to get it managed, without using linux tools for that? regards. Jens Oeser. Jens Oeser wrote: > > Hi! > > I tried to install linux to my sgi indy yesterday, kernel starts up > normally and hangs after "Freeing unused kernel memory 44k freed". Then > i only can reboot the machine. I really don't find the thing causing > that, maybe someone can give me an advise to get linux to work fine. > Hardware: > ip22 175mhz > 64/128mb ram (Depends which machine) > 2gb hdd (2nd machine 2x1GB). > hinv says that i have a indy 24bit ... does this card is supported? I > think so, because kernel messages are printed on the screen, so entire > linux should do so. > So how can i get linux working? > > regards. > Jens Oeser From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Mon Aug 30 04:17:32 1999 Received: from sgi.com (sgi.SGI.COM [192.48.153.1]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA31885 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 04:17:30 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (cthulhu.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.2]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id TAA02323; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 19:14:36 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id TAA47429 for linux-list; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 19:05:13 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id TAA65491 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 19:05:10 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (simba@secns.sec.samsung.co.kr) Received: from network.sec.samsung.co.kr (secns.sec.samsung.co.kr [168.219.201.3]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id TAA07616 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 19:05:08 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (simba@secns.sec.samsung.co.kr) Received: from simba.samsung.co.kr ([168.219.244.175]) by network.sec.samsung.co.kr (8.8.8H1/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA21892 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 11:14:16 +0900 (KST) Received: by simba.samsung.co.kr with Microsoft Mail id <01BEF2D8.16818FC0@simba.samsung.co.kr>; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 11:09:11 +0900 Message-ID: <01BEF2D8.16818FC0@simba.samsung.co.kr> From: simba To: "'linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com'" Subject: rpm: precompiled binary install error Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 11:09:10 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 355 Lines: 9 I downloaded precompiled binary for Linux/i386 from ftp.linux.sgi.com the mips-howto refer to. When I install that dependency error occured. #rpm -ivh binutils-mips-linux-2.8.2-1.i386.rpm failed dependencies libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by binutils-mips-linux-2.8.1-1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by binutils-mips-linux-2.8.1-1 how can I install? From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Mon Aug 30 04:36:12 1999 Received: from deliverator.sgi.com (deliverator.sgi.com [204.94.214.10]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id EAA00324 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 04:36:11 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by deliverator.sgi.com (980309.SGI.8.8.8-aspam-6.2/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id TAA22502; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 19:23:51 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id TAA49633 for linux-list; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 19:17:51 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id TAA19209 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 19:17:47 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (simba@secns.sec.samsung.co.kr) Received: from network.sec.samsung.co.kr (secns.sec.samsung.co.kr [168.219.201.3]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id TAA09342 for ; Sun, 29 Aug 1999 19:17:46 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (simba@secns.sec.samsung.co.kr) Received: from simba.samsung.co.kr ([168.219.244.175]) by network.sec.samsung.co.kr (8.8.8H1/8.8.8) with SMTP id LAA22037 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 11:26:55 +0900 (KST) Received: by simba.samsung.co.kr with Microsoft Mail id <01BEF2D9.DA39D200@simba.samsung.co.kr>; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 11:21:49 +0900 Message-ID: <01BEF2D9.DA39D200@simba.samsung.co.kr> From: simba To: "'linux@engr.sgi.com'" Subject: rpm: precompiled binary install error Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 11:21:47 +0900 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Content-Length: 355 Lines: 9 I downloaded precompiled binary for Linux/i386 from ftp.linux.sgi.com the mips-howto refer to. When I install that dependency error occured. #rpm -ivh binutils-mips-linux-2.8.2-1.i386.rpm failed dependencies libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1) is needed by binutils-mips-linux-2.8.1-1 libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) is needed by binutils-mips-linux-2.8.1-1 how can I install? From owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Mon Aug 30 15:56:42 1999 Received: from pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (pneumatic-tube.sgi.com [204.94.214.22]) by lara.stud.fh-heilbronn.de (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id PAA23110 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 15:56:34 +0200 Received: from cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (gate3-relay.engr.sgi.com [130.62.1.234]) by pneumatic-tube.sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980310.SGI-aspam) via ESMTP id GAA07117; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 06:51:59 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com) Received: (from majordomo-owner@localhost) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) id GAA85226 for linux-list; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 06:43:47 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (owner-linux@relay.engr.sgi.com) Received: from sgi.com (sgi.engr.sgi.com [192.26.80.37]) by cthulhu.engr.sgi.com (980427.SGI.8.8.8/970903.SGI.AUTOCF) via ESMTP id GAA18403 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 06:43:43 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (thomas@baltic-ins-services.net) Received: from gatekeeper.baltic-ins-services.net (gatekeeper.baltic-ins-services.net [195.100.160.130]) by sgi.com (980327.SGI.8.8.8-aspam/980304.SGI-aspam: SGI does not authorize the use of its proprietary systems or networks for unsolicited or bulk email from the Internet.) via ESMTP id GAA00610 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 06:43:21 -0700 (PDT) mail_from (thomas@baltic-ins-services.net) Received: from zoo ([192.168.0.200]) by gatekeeper.baltic-ins-services.net (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id QAA16624 for ; Mon, 30 Aug 1999 16:39:52 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <000901bef2ed$cab2d0c0$c800a8c0@balticinsservices.net> From: "Thomas Berg" To: Subject: crosscompiler Date: Mon, 30 Aug 1999 15:44:32 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook Express 5.00.2314.1300 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V5.00.2314.1300 Sender: owner-linux@cthulhu.engr.sgi.com Precedence: bulk Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Length: 944 Lines: 27 Hello everyone! I've been trying to set up a crosscompiler but it seems I've run out of luck.. binutils(2.8.1 + recommended patch) builds and installs fine egcs(1.0.3a + recommended patch) first installation builds and installs glibc(2.0.6 + addon libs) doesnt come close to building ( [root@sushi build]# CC=mips-linux-gcc BUILD_CC=gcc AR=mips-linux-ar RANLIB=mips-linux-ranlib ../configure --prefix=/usr --host=mips -linux --enable-add-ons=crypt,linuxth reads,localedata --enable-profile ) I have tried this setup on a i386 redhat box (6.0) and on sparc running solaris 7, and taken great care to follow the instructions in the howto. The patch that is used on glibc-2.0.6 in the Linux/MIPS HOWTO is no where to be found ? ie glibc-2.0.6-mips.patch Anyone got a clue what im doing wrong ? (also tried to use the precompiled packages of binutils/egcs etc, no luck there either) best regards, Thomas Berg thomas@baltic-ins-services.net